Yesterday, I was confronted after calling Elizabeth Warren a liar by Cardinal who not only lashed into a pretty insulting tirade aimed at myself, but anyone else that couldn't, or wouldn't play his game of "produce what I demand NOW!"
Warren represents the worst of progressive thought, and action. She is possibly worse than Obama on that front as to the threat she poses to our system of Government, and Economy. Consider in light of this thread where she, in the party of power in the Senate until the end of the month, and a person who said this last year during what was labeled "the Republican shutdown" by libs, and media libs, (start watching at 3:55):
So today would she say that SHE is the one that can't accept the reality of losing an election? Would she consider herself a hostage taker who can't win their fights any other way, and should "get out of the way"? It's rich I tell ya....
When Warren was speaking at the Democratic National Convention, she said at one point while attacking Ted Cruz, and I quote...."...Maybe if they weren't busy saying No, No, No, then we could build a bridge"... Really? Who's saying "No" to this now Liz? She is...Using the very same tactic she denounced when Republican's like Cruz used it...So, what's she for? What she said then? Or now?
Clearly she is a liar...About the Native American claim...
The Washington Post, (clearly NOT a conservative outlet) reports:
"When she [Elizabeth Warren] applied to Penn and Harvard, she checked the box claiming she was Native American..."
The Facts
Warren’s Lineage
Warren has claimed Cherokee and Delaware Indian heritage, but the only proof so far seems to be stories she says she heard from family members as a child. Cherokee groups have demanded documentation of the candidate’s Native American ancestry,
but she hasn’t delivered.
The New England Historic Genealogical Society found a family newsletter that alluded to a marriage-license application supposedly listing Warren’s great-great-great grandmother as part Cherokee.
The Boston Globe misreported this information, saying that the genealogical society had found the marriage license itself and debunked the notion that Warren lied about her lineage. The paper later acknowledged its mistake in a correction notice.
The author of the family newsletter said she didn’t have documentation of the marriage-license application and she doesn’t know who sent her the reference.
(Indian Country Today Media Network has posted the family newsletter on its Web site).
The New England genealogical society clarified in a statement that
it has found no proof of Warren’s self-proclaimed Native American lineage. The group also told The Globe that the candidate’s family is not listed in an early-20th century census of major tribes, known as the Dawes Rolls.
An article in Atlantic magazine pointed out that Warren
“would not be eligible to become a member of any of the three federally recognized Cherokee tribes based on the evidence so far surfaced by independent genealogists about her ancestry.” That’s because her Cherokee ancestors, if she has any, would either be too distant or they never documented their ties in ways that meet the tribes’ requirements.
Did Elizabeth Warren check the Native American box when she ‘applied’ to Harvard and Penn? - The Washington Post
So when she claimed that she was at least in part Native American, that was a pure lie.
Of course the list goes on like most hypocrites in DC there is a long list....But Warren, being an unabashed progressive, anti capitalist, and in many ways Socialist that is further to the left than even Obama, is a further danger to this country...She should be scoffed, and castigated whenever possible.
No? Seems par for the course. Now, move along, sweetheart.
