• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kennesaw City Council rejects mosque proposal

Worst confusion in this sites history.

No one is curtailing the rights of Muslims. The city agreed to the mosque and it will likely go ahead. Ignorance is not your friend. Read, learn, and then comment.

But you two would if you had your way.

I've been accused of standing with terrorists because I support the right of freedom of worship for law abiding citizens.

Perhaps you'd like to comment on that instead of squirming your way out of how much of an absolute bigoted xenophobe you look like in these threads.
 
Ahh, so you think a mosque is analogous to a porn shop. Explain why, j-mac, and while you're at it keep trying to convince people that you don't hate all Muslims.
Leftists are a remarkable group.
 
But you two would if you had your way.
In fact I said the opposite earlier in the thread.
I've been accused of standing with terrorists because I support the right of freedom of worship for law abiding citizens.
No one minds 'law abiding citizens'. Who is against that??? What concerns many is the beliefs of some of these 'law abiding citizens'.

Perhaps you'd like to comment on that instead of squirming your way out of how much of an absolute bigoted xenophobe you look like in these threads.
What I see is a great deal of sub-literate ignorance. This has no effect on me at all.
 
No one minds 'law abiding citizens'. Who is against that??? What concerns many is the beliefs of some of these 'law abiding citizens'.

"I'm not a bigot, I'm just a bigot".

You're as transparent as a glass wall Grant and you always will be.

You're not fooling anyone.

But again I take solace in the fact that your hateful views will never take hold.
 
It must be very weird living in a universe where there's a leftist, muslim plot behind every corner.

Some people just gotta cling to fear, for some odd reason. It used to be a "commie under your bed", now we got those "rag head camel jockeys" who are gonna kill us all!!!
 
Worst confusion in this sites history.

No one is curtailing the rights of Muslims. The city agreed to the mosque and it will likely go ahead. Ignorance is not your friend. Read, learn, and then comment.

Right. They reversed their earlier decision because it turns out "we don't like Muslims" isn't a good reason to deny a permit.
 
In fact I said the opposite earlier in the thread.
No one minds 'law abiding citizens'. Who is against that??? What concerns many is the beliefs of some of these 'law abiding citizens'.

What I see is a great deal of sub-literate ignorance. This has no effect on me at all.


Uhh, how about the people arguing that it's ok to deny a permit to a mosque because THEY MIGHT BE HOUSING TERRISTS
 
"I'm not a bigot, I'm just a bigot". You're as transparent as a glass wall Grant and you always will be. You're not fooling anyone. But again I take solace in the fact that your hateful views will never take hold.

Leftists throw the "hate" word around because, for the most part, words will mean whatever they want them to mean and, secondly, they just aren't very bright. But people who understand, people who are Muslim, or suffered under it, know quite well what it means. All you need do is google anything about Muslims views on Jews, for example..


You may have been asleep for the last few decades but here's what's happening.

Salman Rushdie condemns 'hate-filled rhetoric' of Islamic fanaticism - Telegraph

http://www.amazon.ca/Because-They-Hate-Survivor-Islamic/dp/0312358385

I'll write this slowly so try to absorb it. When any belief system behaves badly then we can question that belief system, and be critical of it. Are you with me so far?

An example. When Priests in the Catholic Church were accused if molesting children, and the leadership tried to cover it up, people protested. And they were right to do that. Many left the Catholic Church because of the scandal and the Church has only recently been recovering. No one ever said, to my knowledge, that all Catholics molest children as it would be foolish to do so. Still with me?

Now, when Muslims are murdering children, not allowing little girls an education, killing innocent people everywhere, in fact you may have heard some of the atrocities carried out in Islam's name, the only right thing to do is criticize this craziness. Do you understand? And we should continue to be critical until Muslims stop it. All of it. Or they, like the Catholics, should leave or find a superior religion. And there are plenty to choose from.

I hope you have learned something today. Merry Christmas.
 
Uhh, how about the people arguing that it's ok to deny a permit to a mosque because THEY MIGHT BE HOUSING TERRISTS
No one denied a building permit to a mosque and we don't always know who the terrorists might be. Of course there are exceptions and many Muslims have openly stated their hatred for the west and then gone about their killing. Fort Hood is an excellent example of this PC attitude run amok. But if we did know who the terrorists are in advance, and acted on it, it would be easy to just put them in a safe place somewhere. Understand?
 
Some people just gotta cling to fear, for some odd reason. It used to be a "commie under your bed", now we got those "rag head camel jockeys" who are gonna kill us all!!!
Actually the Commies were in every room in the house, killed over 100 million people and destroyed the lives of hundreds of millions more. Leftists should try to distance themselves from the Cold War propaganda now that the truth is finally available to them. "Rag head camel jockeys" is a term only a leftist would use.
 
Actually the Commies were in every room in the house, killed over 100 million people and destroyed the lives of hundreds of millions more. Leftists should try to distance themselves from the Cold War propaganda now that the truth is finally available to them. "Rag head camel jockeys" is a term only a leftist would use.

Seriously - you had commies in your house? That is amazing, you should write a book about your travails.

So now you think Ann Coulter is a leftist? Ann Coulter 'Raghead' Comments Spark Blogger Backlash Then there was the South Carolina Republican who didn't care for his party's choice as governor
South Carolina Republican state Sen. Jake Knotts gave us an unusually frank rendition. Of his party’s front-running gubernatorial candidate, state Rep. Nikki Haley, Knotts said, “We already got one raghead in the White House. We don’t need a raghead in the governor’s mansion.” Haley immigrated to the United States as a child from India. She is a convert to Methodism, from Sikhism.

Denial ain't a river in Egypt, you know.
 
Seriously - you had commies in your house?
Reading compression lies at the heart of Gruber's lefties.

Don't follow Ann Coulter. It was a leftist (you) on this thread who said it.

Denial ain't a river in Egypt, you know.
Grammar and reading problems! Time for a complete overhaul in the US educational system.
 
Reading compression lies at the heart of Gruber's lefties.

Don't follow Ann Coulter. It was a leftist (you) on this thread who said it.

Grammar and reading problems! Time for a complete overhaul in the US educational system.


Run away !! Run away !!

Wow, a new obsession on the right - Professor Gruber's words as interpreted by the usual ideologues. Words which by the way I haven't bothered to check up on but I have seen the usual flailing by the usual suspects in the matter

Yeah, I wrote "rag head camel jockeys" as an example of the type of bigoted language found on the right and then when questioned provided examples of some righties using such language but now it's my fault that I pointed out the racism of some folks on the right - darn, I hate it when I make my enemies say stupid things.

The use of the phrase which is rather common on this forum might be seen as a literary emphasis of a problem some folks have with accepting reality - and most of my education was in other countries - English-speaking but not the US
 
It was a 'socialist' who uswd the term. Read and learn.

Ergo, no conservative would ever use the term.

You can pretty much rest assured that when you say "only a leftist would say/do X," you're wrong.
 
Yeah, I wrote "rag head camel jockeys"

Your parents and your teachers should have taught you better. It's an ignorant thing to say and adds nothing to the conversation. Gruber's words were straightforward and aimed at people like yourself.

Care to get back on topic?
 
Ergo, no conservative would ever use the term.

You can pretty much rest assured that when you say "only a leftist would say/do X," you're wrong.
I've never seen it myself. Only a socialist has used the term here. Do you use it?
 
I've never seen it myself. Only a socialist has used the term here. Do you use it?

You were presented with two examples of decidedly non-socialist people using the term "raghead." You ignored it. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
 
You were presented with two examples of decidedly non-socialist people using the term "raghead." You ignored it. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
I have seen no other contributor to this thread use it apart from the Socialist. If you see anyone else use it then be critical of that person.

Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this topic?
 
I have seen no other contributor to this thread use it apart from the Socialist. If you see anyone else use it then be critical of that person.

Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute to this topic?

1. "The Socialist" (I know you're utterly obsessed with labels, but the poster does have a name) was not using the term as a pejorative, but as a demonstrative phrase.

2. You said "ONLY A LEFTIST." Your words. You didn't specify "ONLY A LEFTIST ON THIS THREAD." Goalposts moved.
 
1. "The Socialist" (I know you're utterly obsessed with labels, but the poster does have a name) was not using the term as a pejorative, but as a demonstrative phrase.

2. You said "ONLY A LEFTIST." Your words. You didn't specify "ONLY A LEFTIST ON THIS THREAD." Goalposts moved.

Yes, I saw his demonstration.

So nothing on the topic?
 
Back
Top Bottom