- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 103,959
- Reaction score
- 66,747
- Location
- Uhland, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
1.) nothing there thats unconstitutional
2.) if there are facts and evidence that make it so yes and this has happened
3.) i agree its weird not to have gender listed but im not sure its actually not taken into account, ive seen a good amount of different verbiage
if it is actually not taken into account it should be and with it on there all domestic violence and rape would not fall under that you would still need evidence of gender motivation
1) It is overly broad because if the crime was 99% for financial gain yet 1% racially motivated it could still be elevated to a hate crime (or not). Example "Yeah, I robbed that rich cracker".
3) If gender is taken into account then on what legal basis?