- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 42,424
- Reaction score
- 12,596
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Don't divert from the issue - the issue is whether or not it's okay to publish people's residential info.
No kidding.
Don't divert from the issue - the issue is whether or not it's okay to publish people's residential info.
Absolutely despicable. What is there to gain in publishing this man's address? What purpose does it serve?
http://www.nytimes.com/news/ferguso...n-wilson-police-officer-in-ferguson-shooting/
The paper of record my ass... More like the paper to line bird cages with.
Quit true. It has fallen a great distance when it had established that reputation. But as many things, reputations can be lost and can be earned. Frankly, the NYT has pretty much done everything to lose that reputation, yet many don't believe or acknowledge that it has fallen from the paper of record, to little more than the same journalistic level as the National Esquire.
Don't divert from the issue - the issue is whether or not it's okay to publish people's residential info.
Don't be so smug - anti-choicers have been known to publish the home addresses and phone numbers of doctors. It's despicable no matter who does it.
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
Someone at the NYT should go to jail, if anything happens to Wilson, or his home.
.On the bright side, none of the idiots that are rioting read the NYT, IMO
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
Actually we know its not. The real issue is your weak attempt at equivocation.
at least the new york times is actually capable of reporting the news, unlike something from the blaze or brietbart.
And they are in the process of loosing what little of that they have left to the ideologues that are running that enterprise and making the editorial decisions.
The continued fall in readership would seem to indicate that quite clearly.
If anything happens to Wilson, or his home, he should own the NYT....
There is no right to privacy in your home address whether you shoot someone or not.
Bull**** there is not.
Bring a valid warrant, and we'll talk.
If not, then they can piss off.
There is no right to privacy in your home address whether you shoot someone or not.