• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Brown's stepfather at rally: 'Burn this bitch down!'

I read on here somewhere the other day - I can't remember who said it, so unfortunately I can't give credit where credit is due. But someone said that what people in Ferguson want is not justice for Michael Brown - they want revenge for Michael Brown. Every time I see a "Justice for Mike Brown" poster, I think of that.
 
Ahem. Louis Head IS Michael Brown's stepfather.

Right and your rant addresses Mr. Brown, about "burn this bitch down. Michael Brown's father didn't say that.
 
Grieving parents get a pass from me when it comes to saying stupid things. Looters who are capitalizing on this event to get some freebies? Not so much.

Grieving parents who shout "Burn it down" do not get a pass from me. Inciting riots is not a proper form of grieving.
 
Right and your rant addresses Mr. Brown, about "burn this bitch down. Michael Brown's father didn't say that.

Yea, so I called him Mister Brown. You didn't notice, however, that I preceded that with "A message to Michael Brown's stepfather? OK, so I made a typo. Big deal. Still doesn't detract one iota from my message, does it? Or are you only trying to stir the pot a little here? 'Ya know, those who stir the pot should have to lick the spoon. :mrgreen:
 
Right and your rant addresses Mr. Brown, about "burn this bitch down. Michael Brown's father didn't say that.

He did in fact, say that, the other day, and when asked about it, he got sheepish and said that the moment got away with him.
 
He did in fact, say that, the other day, and when asked about it, he got sheepish and said that the moment got away with him.

Don't think that excuse would hold up in court if he were ever charged with inciting a riot....
 
Don't think that excuse would hold up in court if he were ever charged with inciting a riot....

Just like the NBP bounties, this will likely be excused.
 
Yea, so I called him Mister Brown. You didn't notice, however, that I preceded that with "A message to Michael Brown's stepfather? OK, so I made a typo. Big deal. Still doesn't detract one iota from my message, does it? Or are you only trying to stir the pot a little here? 'Ya know, those who stir the pot should have to lick the spoon. :mrgreen:

Just admit you ****ed it up. ;)

I'm giving you the spoon to lick, because we all know you stir that all the time.
 
He did in fact, say that, the other day, and when asked about it, he got sheepish and said that the moment got away with him.

Stop trying to cover for Dan. He ****ed up; time to take it like a man.
 
Stop trying to cover for Dan. He ****ed up; time to take it like a man.

I'm not covering for Dan. I saw it on the Today show or one of those news shows the other day.

I'm sure you won't believe that either, though. :lol:
 
I'm not covering for Dan. I saw it on the Today show or one of those news shows the other day.

I'm sure you won't believe that either, though. :lol:

Post a link, or quit lieing.
 
MB wasn't shot because he strong arm robbed the store dude...He was shot because he assaulted an officer, tried to take his gun, then when directed to stop and give up, he turned and charged the officer he just assaulted...By saying that he was shot for anything less than that is a lie.

In many other places in the world, an officer would have the training to take such a person down, or would've had backup to not deal with the situation alone.

I'm not anti-gun but our police forces are pathetic in how they always resort to gun use, which is precisely why gun violence by police in the USA is so high. They don't know how to do much else.
 
Can't find one, but that doesn't mean that I'm "lieing."

You can't find one, because Brown didn't say it. You were making **** up to cover for Dan and it blew up in your face.
 
You can't find one, because Brown didn't say it. You were making **** up to cover for Dan and it blew up in your face.

Yeah, you got me. I made it up to cover for Dan because I have this mad crush on him, I guess. :shrug:

I always did a thing for musicians. *sigh* I guess it makes me lie for them on political message boards.
 
Countries like Britain deal with offenders regularly without shooting them to death.

If we're talking about legalities then maybe shooting a thief could be justified in the legal system, but ethically? Something is wrong in the U.S. when petty crime is dealt with by homicide.

But... the sanctity of life in our country no longer applies, especially in poorer areas.

How does Britain deal with suspects who assault police?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/video-kent-police-assault-canterbury-2816552
 
Last edited:
Countries like Britain deal with offenders regularly without shooting them to death.

If we're talking about legalities then maybe shooting a thief could be justified in the legal system, but ethically? Something is wrong in the U.S. when petty crime is dealt with by homicide.

But... the sanctity of life in our country no longer applies, especially in poorer areas.

He wasn't shot for petty crime, he was shot for attacking a police officer. Why do people continue to lie about this?
 
Yeah, you got me. I made it up to cover for Dan because I have this mad crush on him, I guess. :shrug:

I always did a thing for musicians. *sigh* I guess it makes me lie for them on political message boards.

Well, if that's the excuse you want to go with.
 
Countries like Britain deal with offenders regularly without shooting them to death.

If we're talking about legalities then maybe shooting a thief could be justified in the legal system, but ethically? Something is wrong in the U.S. when petty crime is dealt with by homicide.

But... the sanctity of life in our country no longer applies, especially in poorer areas.
He wasn't shot for theft. He was confronted due to the theft. He was shot due to punching a police officer, attempting to disarm him, then failing to follow simple instructions whilst advancing towards a police officer.
 
Today's Rant - A Message to Michael Brown's Stepfather

Look, Mr. Brown, I do feel that police shoot innocent people, but your son was not innocent. He stole cigars, and then punched a cop. Did Officer Wilson use excessive force? We will never know, because witnesses at the grand jury proceeding either lied, and were caught and had to change their stories, or didn't know what they were talking about, and when confronted with that, changed their story. It is very possible that Officer Wilson committed manslaughter or even murder, but witnesses against Wilson wanted him convicted so badly, that they muddied the waters by giving false information. Now, before you start calling me a racist (Even though I live in an almost 100% black neighborhood), look at the evidence. It speaks for itself. Is the evidence accurate? We will never know because of all the false information that was given by liars, and also by well meaning people who bought into a spin that was shown to be false. Just look at the evidence supplied by the witnesses. It is so polluted that there is no way that the grand jury could have arrived at the truth. And that, my friends, is why Officer Wilson was no-billed.

To the protesters who are burning down Ferguson..... Physician, heal thyself. Yes, racism exists, but it's existence is on both sides of the color divide. Before you can make America a better nation, you must put aside your own hatred. It takes two to tango, and if you can't recognize that simple fact, then I am sure that the KKK has some white robes you can wear, because you are no different than they are. Yes, it hurt me say that, but I have never promised that I would gloss over the truth for anybody, whether friend or foe. If you don't like what I am saying, you can always choose to ignore me, but this festering scab will always remain, until people, white and black alike, face this demon which will eventually destroy us all, if not immediately dealt with.

See 'ya in Fallujah, folks.

Thanx for listening.

/RANT

http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/25/us/michael-brown-stepfather-video/index.html

I'm so glad to know that stealing $5 of cigars and tickling a cop in the face (if that actually did happen) deserves the death penalty.

I'll be sure to cite it next time I'm in court for killing someone at the club who looked at me wrong....I felt mortal fear for my life so shot him in the back of the head Judge...it was me or him, so I took him out first.

You .... conservatives, or whatever you Police Statists call yourselves these days:

1) Ignore the real issue (cops killing people without punishment or oversight)
2) Ignore the obvious inconsistencies in Wilson's story especially his non-injured face just to justify your Police State.
 
He wasn't shot for theft. He was confronted due to the theft. He was shot due to punching a police officer, attempting to disarm him, then failing to follow simple instructions whilst advancing towards a police officer.

Maybe there should new equipment developed for cops to use, like a flash bang launcher the size of a handgun.
 
Why not just take lethal arms away from cops?
 
Back
Top Bottom