one witness confirmed wilson's story
watch that witness' testimony be impeached in this video:
O'Donnell, as well as his take on it, is idiotic.
He attaches to much importance to the mentioning of one of the witnesses in a press conference. :doh
He assumes what retell means as it could mean he had already told it to the press or it could simply be the fact that the idiot O'Donnell got this from the FBI interview so of course he already told it to the other investigative agency which there is a record of. :doh
And then he wrongly assumes what this means. "I seen the two guys walkin' down the street on the same sidewalk that I was on ..."
The witness clearly says they were walking down the Street. And as he said
street, his following use of sidewalk would indicate he that it was the same street
of the sidewalk he was on.
The guy is clearly saying they were in the street.
O'Donnell just doesn't like the verdict, probably because of his anti-gun nuttery and is grasping.
So no, he didn't impeach anything and he made no compelling argument.
If he had been able to present that foolishness to the GJ, they would have laughed him out of the room.
your loss. he made a very compelling argument against the manner in which the grand jury was manipulated by the prosecutor
No he didn't.
He made some absurd statements that he can't back up.
He neglected to tell you (lied) that there were other witnesses that said Brown was moving toward the Officer. Witness 48 specifically indicated that Brown was running at the Officer.
He doesn't get it and never will.
He says there is no real reason to believe Officer Wilson's account of Brown charging him.
That is bs.
There is reason to believe such and such an assertion is credible.
He charges the Officer shooting at him. D'oh!
Of course Brown charging Wilson is credible.