who questioned what was presented, such as asking if this was the face of someone who being truthful when he said he was fearful the next blow to it might be fatal:
View attachment 67176427
who questioned why there was no material from wilson under brown's fingernails despite wilson's insistence that brown scratched him
in short, there was no party asking whether the proffered 'evidence' was the evidence it was presented to be. there was no rebuttal, no questioning of the 'evidence'
there were witnesses saying brown charged the officer. there were others saying he put his hands in a position of surrender. that alone should have been enough to cause there to be a basis for a trial to ferret out which testimony was truthful. there was enough doubt about that circumstance alone to provoke a finding of probable cause. the testimony of the officer does not reconcile with the facts relative to the distance of the officer from brown at the time of the shooting. was he mistaken or lying. again, a basis for probable cause
to fail to try the officer to determine the truth of this case is a failure of our justice system