Let's assume, for the moment, that this is true or you belive it to be true.
but I don't take seriously people who throw around "Tyrant"
We have a tyrant today. He is ruling without the consent of the governed rather than faithfully executing the laws. He is making his own laws. He is enforcing law on a whim. Those things are sufficient to identify Obama as a tyrant.
- if he's a tyrant then so was W. Bush and Reagan and Clinton and Nixon,
Make your case. How did Bush rule without the consent of the governed? How did Reagan rule without the consent of the governed? How did Clinton rule without the consent of the governed? How did Nixon rule without the consent of the governed?
and we've been living in "TYRANNY" for decades.
Make your case. I will read it.
And using the term to refer to an American POTUS trivializes the regimes under which people really ARE oppressed in lawless states around the world.
My concern is for this lawless regime. I do not care at all about what other lawless leaders do. They are not my problem. This Lawless One is my problem. And yours. It is no excuse that people are not yet disappearing. Tyranny begins with lawlessness in this case. We must end it by holding the Father of Lies accountable, by impeaching him, convicting him and removing him from office. It is no excuse, in fact it is irresponsible to say we should do nothing because other tyrants are worse than ours.
Unlike those regimes, there are options here, and the House is turning to one of them - a lawsuit and the courts.
The only worse solution is to do nothing at all. The legislature has failed to use its Constitutional tools, to impeach, to withhold funds through budgets, and to withhold appointments and other legislation the executive branch desires. If it loses in the courts then the legislature becomes nothing more than a fig leaf. It will be like the Roman Senate under Augustus. We will have the fiction of representative government with its substance. Only craven, spineless men and women would do as this Congress has done.
They can also withhold funds, pass a new law, or impeach this "Tyrant," which would get them executed, or imprisoned, in actual tyrannical regimes.
That other nations are further down the road to totalitarian authoritarian states is a warning that the time to stop a tyrant is early. Today. Now. It is not helpful to wait because other tyrants are worse than our own.
And in two years, this "Tyrant" will walk out of the WH and be peacefully replaced by someone elected by us, which doesn't happen in actually tyrannical regimes. Etc. etc.....................
So, in your serious post you have said this tyrant is really not all that tyrannical. We can let him advance his tyrannies for two more years because we can elect a whole new tyrant who will use these examples as precedence for his or her own tyrannical acts.
It hsi what your serious post intended to convey?