• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department dispatches poll monitors for Election Day

ChezC3 said:
I think you have it confused. You have to actually have a position to offer to have a debate. You don't. There's no debate.
Click to expand...

No. I'm not confused. This is debating and you don't know wtf you are doing. I've given you several chances to back up anything you say and providing a google search result isn't doing that. One day you may get the picture but today you don't.
 
poweRob said:
No. I'm not confused. This is debating and you don't know wtf you are doing. I've given you several chances to back up anything you say and providing a google search result isn't doing that. One day you may get the picture but today you don't.
Click to expand...

:yawn:

Refer to post #50
 
poweRob said:
*protip

Here's how debate works... you say something it is YOUR responsibility to back it up. So do stop bitching about people not wanting to go out and do your homework for you and look up your claims for you.
Click to expand...


What, prove that Demos have committed voter fraud all in the past and several times in Chicago? You weren't trying to deny that BS were you? As that would be some really funny **** if you were.

Then to break out links, all to show it would help you and the Left out.....how again?
 
ChezC3 said:
No, of course you aren't that would be silly talk...You're just denying that proof was given. You seem confused in thinking that because you refuse to accept it, that I've refused to give it.

We both know that's not the case...:wink2:


You're just being playful...:tongue4:
Click to expand...



Mornin Chez :2wave: .....yeah, you might want to keep it real simple. Shorter sentences might work.....although that's not a guarantee. :lol:
 
ChezC3 said:
:yawn:

Refer to post #50
Click to expand...

linking to a google search results page isn't providing anything. You've embarrassed yourself immensely in front of many people and I doubt even those on your side would care to stand by your side a this point because you are being obstinate on top of your ignorance. Learn how to debate.
 
MMC said:
What, prove that Demos have committed voter fraud all in the past and several times in Chicago? You weren't trying to deny that BS were you? As that would be some really funny **** if you were.

Then to break out links, all to show it would help you and the Left out.....how again?
Click to expand...

If I make a claim, I'll back it up with a link. If I don't and someone says "prove it" I go get one. Are you really gonna back up a putz who makes claims and doesn't back them up simply because you want to show your partisan colors?
 
poweRob said:
If I make a claim, I'll back it up with a link. If I don't and someone says "prove it" I go get one. Are you really gonna back up a putz who makes claims and doesn't back them up simply because you want to show your partisan colors?
Click to expand...


Well, like him and coming from here in Chicago I already know about the 67 convictions for Voter fraud that took place in 82. That was over 200k votes. Which that was the Largest for Illinois and Chicago in its history. But there are quite a few.
 
Is anyone else getting a sense, lately, that the name “Justice Department” has been sounding an awful lot like any of the three Ministries from Orwell's 1984?
 
Bob Blaylock said:
Is anyone else getting a sense, lately, that the name “Justice Department” has been sounding an awful lot like any of the three Ministries from Orwell's 1984?
Click to expand...

Someone in the Obama administration could adopt a puppy and you'd still perceive it as an evil plot.
 
Deuce said:
Someone in the Obama administration could adopt a puppy and you'd still perceive it as an evil plot.
Click to expand...

If it's Asian democrats adopting puppies, I'm generally suspicious. Especially if they show up for the adoption with a tape measure.
 
MMC said:
Well, like him and coming from here in Chicago I already know about the 67 convictions for Voter fraud that took place in 82. That was over 200k votes. Which that was the Largest for Illinois and Chicago in its history. But there are quite a few.
Click to expand...

You may act like it's just common knowledge but it needs to be backed up. Most people don't live in Chicago and I'd like to see the story and the source of such claims. In my experience, people that don't want to back up their claims with a link know they are spewing bull or know that their source is crap.
 
poweRob said:
You may act like it's just common knowledge but it needs to be backed up. Most people don't live in Chicago and I'd like to see the story and the source of such claims. In my experience, people that don't want to back up their claims with a link know they are spewing bull or know that their source is crap.
Click to expand...

Not when its History and carried a Nation Headline.




Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: 100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago

The "Truth About Voter Fraud," according to activ*ist groups like the Brennan Center, is that "many of the claims of voter fraud amount to a great deal of smoke without much fire…. The allegations simply do not pan out.

Chicago, however, is known for its fires, and there was a roaring one there in 1982 that resulted in one of the largest voter fraud prosecutions ever conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. The telltale smoke arose out of one of the closest governor's races in Illi*nois history; and as for the fire, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago at the time, Daniel Webb, estimated that at least 100,000 fraudulent votes (10 percent of all votes in the city) had been cast.[2] Sixty-five individuals were indicted for federal election crimes, and all but two (one found incompetent to stand trial and another who died) were convicted. [3]

Conclusion - Voter fraud in Chicago, in just one election, led to 100,000 phony votes,[64] bringing the defendants in this case within 5,000 votes of stealing the gov*ernorship of Illinois. This case of widespread fraud was broken wide open only because of the failed promise of a city job to one of the participants and the dogged determination of a United States Attor*ney who was willing to commit the time, resources, and manpower required for a massive investigation and multiple prosecutions. The Justice Department has never engaged in such an intense investigation since then, to the detriment of the electoral system.....snip~

Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: 100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago
 
MMC said:
Not when its History and carried a Nation Headline.




Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: 100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago

The "Truth About Voter Fraud," according to activ*ist groups like the Brennan Center, is that "many of the claims of voter fraud amount to a great deal of smoke without much fire…. The allegations simply do not pan out.

Chicago, however, is known for its fires, and there was a roaring one there in 1982 that resulted in one of the largest voter fraud prosecutions ever conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice. The telltale smoke arose out of one of the closest governor's races in Illi*nois history; and as for the fire, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago at the time, Daniel Webb, estimated that at least 100,000 fraudulent votes (10 percent of all votes in the city) had been cast.[2] Sixty-five individuals were indicted for federal election crimes, and all but two (one found incompetent to stand trial and another who died) were convicted. [3]

Conclusion - Voter fraud in Chicago, in just one election, led to 100,000 phony votes,[64] bringing the defendants in this case within 5,000 votes of stealing the gov*ernorship of Illinois. This case of widespread fraud was broken wide open only because of the failed promise of a city job to one of the participants and the dogged determination of a United States Attor*ney who was willing to commit the time, resources, and manpower required for a massive investigation and multiple prosecutions. The Justice Department has never engaged in such an intense investigation since then, to the detriment of the electoral system.....snip~

Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: 100,000 Stolen Votes in Chicago
Click to expand...


Heritage... figures. Anyhow... after just glazing over the article how many people were indicted and jailed for this?
 
Why shouldn't illegal voters be discriminated against in the first place. The Holder administration is a very scumbaggy and racist organization.
 
poweRob said:
linking to a google search results page isn't providing anything. You've embarrassed yourself immensely in front of many people and I doubt even those on your side would care to stand by your side a this point because you are being obstinate on top of your ignorance. Learn how to debate.
Click to expand...

Uh huh...:coffeepap
 
poweRob said:
Heritage... figures. Anyhow... after just glazing over the article how many people were indicted and jailed for this?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I knew you take it that way coming from Heritage. Its not so much Heritage its who wrote about it. But here from the real News Source.


Webb Makes Pitch For Election Reforms.....September 18, 1985.

Former U.S. Atty. Dan Webb urged the Illinois legislature Tuesday to approve a package of election reforms--including appointing full-time election judges and fingerprinting voters--to reduce incidents of election fraud in Chicago. Webb made his comments during a hearing by the state Senate Republican Task Force on Vote Fraud, held in the State of Illinois Center. Among his recommendations:

Webb was U.S. attorney when a federal grand jury was convened to investigate allegations of widespread vote fraud in the 1982 election. At that time, the grand jury determined that ``there was a substantial vote fraud in the City of Chicago during the election and that similar fraudulent activities have occurred prior to 1982.``

As a result of the investigation, 58 people, ``between 20 and 30 of them precinct captains and the rest election judges,`` were convicted of federal election crimes, according to Webb.....snip~

Webb Makes Pitch For Election Reforms - Chicago Tribune
 
poweRob said:
If I make a claim, I'll back it up with a link. If I don't and someone says "prove it" I go get one. Are you really gonna back up a putz who makes claims and doesn't back them up simply because you want to show your partisan colors?
Click to expand...

Yo schwanz, what part aren't you getting? You were given a multitude of examples and told to pick one that you like. You decide the source so you can't cry about it, like you did in the post to MMC, "Ewe, Heritage, would have figured..." If you just grabbed your loin and chose the link you preferred instead of *****footing around crying about how you didn't get your way, this would have been over and you would have realized that there was never going to be a debate because you never had a leg to stand on in the first place. From Tammany Hall to the Daley Machine, Dems are renowned for their voter fraud. So the only one ignorant in all this is you, if you didn't know.
 
ChezC3 said:
Yo schwanz, what part aren't you getting? You were given a multitude of examples and told to pick one that you like. You decide the source so you can't cry about it, like you did in the post to MMC, "Ewe, Heritage, would have figured..." If you just grabbed your loin and chose the link you preferred instead of *****footing around crying about how you didn't get your way, this would have been over and you would have realized that there was never going to be a debate because you never had a leg to stand on in the first place. From Tammany Hall to the Daley Machine, Dems are renowned for their voter fraud. So the only one ignorant in all this is you, if you didn't know.
Click to expand...


Heya Chez. :2wave: Hell, I didn't know Webb wanted to fingerprint.....Everyone. :lol:


 
MMC said:
Heya Chez. :2wave: Hell, I didn't know Webb wanted to fingerprint.....Everyone. :lol:
Click to expand...

Actually I'm more like....

 
ChezC3 said:
Yo schwanz, what part aren't you getting? You were given a multitude of examples and told to pick one that you like. You decide the source so you can't cry about it, like you did in the post to MMC, "Ewe, Heritage, would have figured..." If you just grabbed your loin and chose the link you preferred instead of *****footing around crying about how you didn't get your way, this would have been over and you would have realized that there was never going to be a debate because you never had a leg to stand on in the first place. From Tammany Hall to the Daley Machine, Dems are renowned for their voter fraud. So the only one ignorant in all this is you, if you didn't know.
Click to expand...

Still can't back up what you say. Don't blame others.
 
poweRob said:
Still can't back up what you say. Don't blame others.
Click to expand...

What are you saying here? No one is blaming anyone, I'm merely pointing out that you lost before you began and all subsequent post, including your initial one to me was an act of futility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom