• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hacker group anonymous claims the shooter of Michael Brown will not be charged

Excon said:
Not when they tell you to get a new one because the one you have is giving you false positives.
Which should translate as; Get a better one.
Click to expand...

Soooo... when your virus software actually detects a virus do you just assume the virus software is broken? :lamo
 
Kobie said:
Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.

Sometimes, it's like some of you WANT riots.
Click to expand...

I think most people are predicting riots in Ferguson because there have already been riots in Ferguson.
 
Kobie said:
Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.
Click to expand...

I do recall an uptick in Black-on-White assaults, with "This is for Trayvon" added in many of them.
 
Roadvirus said:
I do recall an uptick in Black-on-White assaults, with "This is for Trayvon" added in many of them.
Click to expand...

Is there any actual empirical evidence that there WAS an "uptick," or did they just receive more coverage from conservative media?
 
jmotivator said:
Soooo... when your virus software actually detects a virus do you just assume the virus software is broken? :lamo
Click to expand...
Wut?
You must not be paying attention. :doh
He was corrected. There was no virus. It was a false positive, which is why it was suggested he get new software.
 
Kobie said:
Is there any actual empirical evidence that there WAS an "uptick," or did they just receive more coverage from conservative media?
Click to expand...
Uptick?
These claims made by the criminals did not exist prior to.
So it couldn't be because of more coverage.
 
Excon said:
Wut?
You must not be paying attention. :doh
He was corrected. There was no virus. It was a false positive, which is why it was suggested he get new software.
Click to expand...

Your argument that his virus alert was wrong because your virus scanner didn't alert you was not very smart. Even if the end result is that his alert was false it is still a really really dumb way to evaluate virus threats. It could just as easily (more easily) have been that your virus definitions were missing the entry for whatever virus he picked up on his scan. Since you didn't bother to ask him what scanning software he was running and how recent his definitions were you had no clue whatsoever whether his scanner was wrong and yours was right, certainly not enough information to dismiss his warning.
 
jmotivator said:
Your argument that his virus alert was wrong because your virus scanner didn't alert you was not very smart. Even if the end result is that his alert was false it is still a really really dumb way to evaluate virus threats. It could just as easily (more easily) have been that your virus definitions were missing the entry for whatever virus he picked up on his scan. Since you didn't bother to ask him what scanning software he was running and how recent his definitions were you had no clue whatsoever whether his scanner was wrong and yours was right, certainly not enough information to dismiss his warning.
Click to expand...
You are doing a lot of assuming there.
Nor do not know what I did on my end to determine if there was or wasn't a threat. Even the claim that the link from the dailymail had a virus while not impossible, is ridiculous because of likelihood.


The fact remains that it was a false positive, and I informed him of it.
And that, as well as suggesting he get better software is a wise thing to do.
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
You are doing a lot of assuming there.
Nor do not know what I did on my end to determine if there was or wasn't a threat. Even the claim that the link from the dailymail had a virus while not impossible, is ridiculous because of likelihood.

The fact remains that it was a false positive, and I informed him of it.
And that, as well as suggesting he get better software is a wise thing to do.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't actually have enough information to make such a call. Making unsubstantiated claims is not helpful even if they are subject to the broken clock rule.

You are only making yourself look more ignorant by claiming that it wasn't very likely because of the site.

You don't know what you are talking about and so you give terrible advice to people in telling them to ignore their virus alerts.
 
Excon said:
Uptick?
These claims made by the criminals did not exist prior to.
So it couldn't be because of more coverage.
Click to expand...

I'm talking an actual, verifiable increase in black-on-white assaults.
 
Kobie said:
I'm talking an actual, verifiable increase in black-on-white assaults.
Click to expand...
So what you are saying is that these people committing those crimes would have committed them anyways.
Interesting.

Regardless.
What you ask for I think would be actually hared to prove immediately because of the way that data is collected and reported. I think you know that.
Secondly; I think it would also be hard to tell if there was an overall decrease in crime but up-ticked back to the same level because of Zimmerman.
Which you probably also know.
So your query is really disingenuous, not only in what you ask, but for any point you think you are trying to make by asking.
:shrug:

The fact remains that many crimes were committed with the criminal stating that it was for Trayvon.
 
Excon said:
iLOL :lamo
Not with that attitude, especially as you already know it is true.
Click to expand...
We know no such thing ...
... you are talking out your butt hole again and blaming my "attitude" for your inability to back up your unfounded allegations.
images (5).jpg
 
Buck Ewer said:
We know no such thing ...
... you are talking out your butt hole again and blaming my "attitude" for your inability to back up your unfounded allegations.
Click to expand...
What a silly reply, especially as you do know.
And your false claim is absurd, I have no such inability as you claim. I made a choice not to supply you with what you already know. That is a big difference, especially as I could supply News reports as well as video News reports saved to Youtube.
So stop your silly bs, you already know they exist.


And presently I am busy, so if anybody else asks, I will consider their request when I can.
 
Last edited:
Excon said:
What a silly reply, especially as you do know.
And your false claim is absurd, I have no such inability as you claim. I made a choice not to supply you with what you already know. That is a big difference, especially as I could supply News reports as well as video News reports saved to Youtube.
So stop your silly bs, you already know they exist.


And presently I am busy, so if anybody else asks, I will get to their requests when I can.
Click to expand...
Once again excon makes unfounded allegations that he can never back up with evidence...
not at all inconsistent with the type of hollow and empty generalizations and assumptions made by racists.
 
SMTA said:
Yea, well 'those people' do a wonderful job in acting like undisciplined morons in causing destruction and hurting people and businesses.

Funny how they first loot electronic stores, getting high-end equipment for themselves first.

They deserve the full measure of law enforcement for their illegal actions.

There is no excuse for their actions.
Click to expand...

Way to stereotype an entire group of people for the presumed actions of what you feel (and hope?) that a select few will do.
 
 
Buck Ewer said:
Once again excon makes unfounded allegations that he can never back up with evidence...
not at all inconsistent with the type of hollow and empty generalizations and assumptions made by racists.
Click to expand...
Your posting is absurdly ridiculous as well as dishonest.
Which of course is the norm for you.
I haven't made any unfounded allegations, nor can you point to any.

And unlike you, I have always been able to back up what I say.
And this whole exchange is nonsense from you because you do know that they do exist.
Some have even been discussed on this board. Yet here you are making unfounded allegations. :doh
And between the two of us, the application of racist that you make, only applies to you.


contrapositive said:
Witness claims youths yelled 'this is for Trayvon' in beating - Baltimore Sun

Police: Robbers tell man, 'This is for Trayvon Martin' - CNN.com

'This is for Trayvon Martin': 3 black men beat, rob white man in D.C. - Washington Times

Trayvon Martin case: 6 youths 'beat man, 78, in twisted racial revenge attack' | Daily Mail Online

Police: Assault, Robbery Investigated as Hate Crime | NBC4 Washington

Teen Charged With Hate Crime, Says He Was Mad About Trayvon Martin « CBS Chicago

Alabama man
Click to expand...
Damn.
:thumbs:
There are more examples out there, but I really wish you would have allowed him to dig his hole deeper.
 
Phys251 said:
Way to stereotype an entire group of people for the presumed actions of what you feel (and hope?) that a select few will do.
Click to expand...

Based on reality, not my opinion.
 
Kobie said:
I'm certainly not justifying rioting. But I think we know who a few posters here are rooting for to get very, very angry.
Click to expand...

No rooting will be required - they will riot, loot, break numerous laws, and cry foul when the police come - all by themselves.

Surely some looted high end video and audio equipment will help them with their sorrow.

Happens every time.
 
How do you charge an innocent cop of doing his duty and exercising his right to defend himself? If the rioters again take to the streets I hope all cops have cameras on them so this time there won't be any phony charges of murder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom