• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hacker group anonymous claims the shooter of Michael Brown will not be charged

buck

DP Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
13,061
Reaction score
5,128
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
I'm not certain how much to trust anonymous on the subject...

But the businesses surrounding the area being told to prepare for larger riots and the police and jails in the area stocking up on riot control supplies and even the schools asking them not to announce the GJ decision until after school is out... It seems likely to be true and based on good information.

Darren Wilson source claims he will NOT be indicted for Michael Brown shooting | Daily Mail Online

It is probably true. The facts seem to bear out that he shot from self defense. He might have overdone it but was probably still within his rights.
 
The link at the OP has a virus.
 
I'm not certain how much to trust anonymous on the subject...

But the businesses surrounding the area being told to prepare for larger riots and the police and jails in the area stocking up on riot control supplies and even the schools asking them not to announce the GJ decision until after school is out... It seems likely to be true and based on good information.

Darren Wilson source claims he will NOT be indicted for Michael Brown shooting | Daily Mail Online
You mean there will be rioting and violence by black mobs who didn't get their lynching? Impossible.
 
Taking advice about virus detection from people on the internet is a good way to get your computer loaded up with viruses.
Not when they tell you to get a new one because the one you have is giving you false positives.
Which should translate as; Get a better one.
 
Not when they tell you to get a new one because the one you have is giving you false positives.
Which should translate as; Get a better one
.



You do what you want to do and I'll continue to do what I want to do.

IOW: take your ideas and shove 'em where the sun doesn't shine.
 
You do what you want to do and I'll continue to do what I want to do.

IOW: take your ideas and shove 'em where the sun doesn't shine.
:doh
Get a grip.

You got a false positive. Getting new anti-virus software which doesn't give you such false positives is good advice.
You don't have to accept the advice, but it was still good advice.
 
It would neither surprise me if the hacker group anonymous obtained access to said data or if it showed that Darren Wilson will not face charges. Come to think of it, it will also not surprise me when this is released we see more stores looted in protest.

Cause nothing says you care more about a social matter than destroying businesses, stealing things, and other lawlessness.
 
I'm not certain how much to trust anonymous on the subject...

There really doesn't appear to be anything new in the Anonymous tweets. First, if the account in The Washington Post is accurate regarding the forensic evidence, there would likely be legitimate grounds for the police office to have acted in self-defense (actual and/or perceived threat of imminent risk to the officer's life or of serious harm). Given the selective nature of the leaks and earlier conflicts in witness statements, some degree of uncertainty exists, but it probably is more likely than not that the police officer will not be indicted. Second, the newspaper story cited also mentioned that the Grand Jury's verdict was to be expected sometime "next month" (November), so again the expected timing isn't really new. What about after November 4? November 1 and 2 fall on the weekend, so no Grand Jury decision is likely then. That leaves 28 days for November and 26 (93%) fall after November 4. Therefore, there is a very high probability that the decision would be released after November 4. In sum, there doesn't appear to be anything really new or significant in the tweets that had not been expected prior to the tweets. If anything, the tweets seem to reflect prevailing expectations given the recently leaked evidence and the probability regarding the timing of the Grand Jury's decision.
 
Taking advice about virus detection from people on the internet is a good way to get your computer loaded up with viruses.

And anonymous people on the internet who incorrectly scream 'virus' when there is none is a problem.
 
You mean there will be rioting and violence by black mobs who didn't get their lynching? Impossible.

Yea, that is the really irritating part.

Surely they will 'riot for justice', which just drips self-centered hypocrisy.

At that point, I doubt that they will garner any sympathy - certainly not from me.

If Wilson acted lawfully in defending himself, then he has done nothing wrong.

Sadly, he will probably have to sell his house and move elsewhere.
 
Yea, that is the really irritating part.

Surely they will 'riot for justice', which just drips self-centered hypocrisy.

At that point, I doubt that they will garner any sympathy - certainly not from me.

If Wilson acted lawfully in defending himself, then he has done nothing wrong.

Sadly, he will probably have to sell his house and move elsewhere.



Right, if. That's the key word in that sentence.
 
I'm not certain how much to trust anonymous on the subject...

But the businesses surrounding the area being told to prepare for larger riots and the police and jails in the area stocking up on riot control supplies and even the schools asking them not to announce the GJ decision until after school is out... It seems likely to be true and based on good information.

Darren Wilson source claims he will NOT be indicted for Michael Brown shooting | Daily Mail Online

I hate cops, yet Wilsons claims are legit.

Brown was shot in the hand at close range as Wilson clearly stated Brown punched him in the face and grabbed his gun..

Sorry but I have absolutely ZERO sympathy for a kid punching a cop in the face for no reason then running away after he's shot in the hand trying to grab an officers gun.

What was Wilson supposed to do just let him run away after he already ripped off a store, assaulted an officer and ended up getting shot in the hand.
 
You mean there will be rioting and violence by black mobs who didn't get their lynching? Impossible.

Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.

Sometimes, it's like some of you WANT riots.
 
Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.

Sometimes, it's like some of you WANT riots.

Yeah right.... You also don't remember the Rodney King riots either?
 
Get the Army National Guard ready, march in with armored vehicles and heavily armed soldiers. Make an announcement that any criminal activity will be dealt with decisively. There has to be an overwhelming show of force.
 
Get the Army National Guard ready, march in with armored vehicles and heavily armed soldiers. Make an announcement that any criminal activity will be dealt with decisively. There has to be an overwhelming show of force.

No, let them destroy their own community while crying how oppressed they are.

They obviously don't value any of it if they're willing to destroy it..... Who can value anything anyways if you live for free?
 
Yeah right.... You also don't remember the Rodney King riots either?

22 years ago. In the biggest miscarriage of justice in my memory.

You want riots. You want unrest. So you can self-backpat and claim you were right about "those people."
 
Get the Army National Guard ready, march in with armored vehicles and heavily armed soldiers. Make an announcement that any criminal activity will be dealt with decisively. There has to be an overwhelming show of force.

Pre-emptive martial law. Congratulations.

And you guys claim liberals are the authoritarian ones.
 
22 years ago. In the biggest miscarriage of justice in my memory.

You want riots. You want unrest. So you can self-backpat and claim you were right about "those people."

I was right.... They killed innocent people, nearly beat an innocent truck driver to death with a brick on national TV and pretty much destroyed everything in their wake.

Now, would an intelligent populace or person endorse such anarchy?

Considering you're a progressive you probably found all that **** amusing...
 
Pre-emptive martial law. Congratulations.

And you guys claim liberals are the authoritarian ones.

Forget martial law - none of that **** would ever happen where I live.....
 
I was right.... They killed innocent people, nearly beat an innocent truck driver to death with a brick on national TV and pretty much destroyed everything in their wake.

Now, would an intelligent populace or person endorse such anarchy?

Considering you're a progressive you probably found all that **** amusing...

I'm not a "progressive."
 
Back
Top Bottom