• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC [W:110]

Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

Kobie, you know nothing about medicine, and pay no price for being wrong.

Now, why do you think that dems are now saying they want to close entry from outbreak nations?


The doctor does, and a lot more about Ebola in particular. Kobie is on the correct side of the argument here, not the headless chicken littles.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

This guy is a Doctor.....an yet as a Doctor he shows us how even Doctors can be fools. This mope knew he was working with Ebola Patients. For 8 months he was in Guinea. He should have isolated himself Right off the top coming from the Infected Country.

Not only was he out bowling.....but he took the subway, then went out to the park.

Was also out jogging.....which he said he was feeling down then.

Until he spiked a temp he was not infectious. Fact.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

This guy is a Doctor.....an yet as a Doctor he shows us how even Doctors can be fools. This mope knew he was working with Ebola Patients. For 8 months he was in Guinea. He should have isolated himself Right off the top coming from the Infected Country.

Not only was he out bowling.....but he took the subway, then went out to the park.

Was also out jogging.....which he said he was feeling down then.

Personally, if it were me, I would have self-quarantined for the full 21 days after my having returned out of an abundance of caution. I do think that once he began feeling sluggish, he should have restricted his contact with the public. At that point, there was a probability that he could become symptomatic e.g., sudden onset of fever, so there was a chance that it could have happened when he was in contact with the public.

Fortunately, Ebola is not an airborne virus. So far, there are no reports that he was symptomatic while in the public.

Also, NYC has a number of amazing world-class hospitals. I have great confidence that the doctor's case (and any others that might occur in the greater NYC area e.g., from people who returned from Ebola-stricken areas) will be handled with the attention to detail and competence necessary to minimize the risk of its spreading to the health care workers who treat him (and any other future ebola patients). Of course, there's always some small probability of their being infected, but I think it is probably as low as it could be given present knowledge and protection.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

If we keep letting people back into the US from West Africa without testing/quarantining them first - it's gonna happen and will continue to happen. The problem is at some point it will start spreading here - so the standard question of "Have you recently visited Western Africa" won't work. People will come in with 103 degree temps and will be sent home again because it's going to be flu season. Then Ebola really starts to spread here in the US.



Mornin' Ockham. :2wave: Now there is an International Study challenging the 21 day incubation period.....and I would have to agree with them.



21-day isolation for patients with Ebola may not be enough: study.....

An international study has questioned the incubation period of 21 days for the ebola virus disease (EVD), fixed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States. The study, published on Tuesday in Plos Current, a medical journal dedicated to infectious diseases outbreak, suggests that 21 days may not be enough to completely prevent the spread of the virus. Experts say there is a fair chance someone could be infected even after the 21-day quarantine.

Dr Charles Hass, the author of the study, said there could be up to a 12 % chance of a person being infected even after the 21-day quarantine.

“The study raises a very critical concern about the disease and its subsequent management. A lot still remains unknown about Ebola. As far as 21 days of incubation is concerned, it applies to only a certain set of bodily fluids,” said Dr Om Srivastava, infectious disease expert at Jaslok Hospital......snip~

http://www.hindustantimes.com/world...may-not-be-enough-study/article1-1276214.aspx
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Personally, if it were me, I would have self-quarantined for the full 21 days after my having returned out of an abundance of caution. I do think that once he began feeling sluggish, he should have restricted his contact with the public. At that point, there was a probability that he could become symptomatic e.g., sudden onset of fever, so there was a chance that it could have happened when he was in contact with the public.

Fortunately, Ebola is not an airborne virus. So far, there are no reports that he was symptomatic while in the public.

Also, NYC has a number of amazing world-class hospitals. I have great confidence that the doctor's case (and any others that might occur in the greater NYC area e.g., from people who returned from Ebola-stricken areas) will be handled with the attention to detail and competence necessary to minimize the risk of its spreading to the health care workers who treat him (and any other future ebola patients). Of course, there's always some small probability of their being infected, but I think it is probably as low as it could be given present knowledge and protection.


Mornin DS. :2wave: I don't know.....what do you think these doctors are saying?


Dr Brosseau is a Professor and Dr Jones an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

We believe there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.

We strongly urge the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to seek funds for the purchase and transport of PAPRs to all healthcare workers currently fighting the battle against Ebola throughout Africa—and beyond.....snip~

papr_0.jpg

PAPR.

COMMENTARY: Health workers need optimal respiratory protection for Ebola | CIDRAP
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Personally, if it were me, I would have self-quarantined for the full 21 days after my having returned out of an abundance of caution. I do think that once he began feeling sluggish, he should have restricted his contact with the public. At that point, there was a probability that he could become symptomatic e.g., sudden onset of fever, so there was a chance that it could have happened when he was in contact with the public.

Fortunately, Ebola is not an airborne virus. So far, there are no reports that he was symptomatic while in the public.

Also, NYC has a number of amazing world-class hospitals. I have great confidence that the doctor's case (and any others that might occur in the greater NYC area e.g., from people who returned from Ebola-stricken areas) will be handled with the attention to detail and competence necessary to minimize the risk of its spreading to the health care workers who treat him (and any other future ebola patients). Of course, there's always some small probability of their being infected, but I think it is probably as low as it could be given present knowledge and protection.

Doctors and to a greater extent, nurses deal daily with highly infectious and/or deadly illnesses. Then they shower and go home to family and friends. He wasn't irresponsible, and until he was symptomatic there was no need for isolation. He checked himself twice a day, and as soon as he spiked a temp, he did exactly what he should.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Until he spiked a temp he was not infectious. Fact.

Fact.....they don't know all there is to know.

Which still doesn't explain why this Doctor would lose all common sense and go out into a public place. Just coming from an Infected Country.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Mornin DS. :2wave: I don't know.....what do you think these doctors are saying?


Dr Brosseau is a Professor and Dr Jones an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

We believe there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.

We strongly urge the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to seek funds for the purchase and transport of PAPRs to all healthcare workers currently fighting the battle against Ebola throughout Africa—and beyond.....snip~

papr_0.jpg

PAPR.

COMMENTARY: Health workers need optimal respiratory protection for Ebola | CIDRAP

They may be talking about a small and/or theoretical risk. As a matter of principle, I favor giving health care workers the maximum protection possible. If Congress would need to appropriate funds to help make this possible, I would have no objections.
 
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

One can't spread it when one isn't symptomatic.

Wrong DS.....one can even spread it when Cured.

Sperm can contain the virus for a period of three to six months even after a person has been cured of EVD. The 21-day quarantine period remains ambiguous and we need more research to conclusively establish its basis,” added Dr Srivastava......snip~
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Moderator's Warning:
The Conspiracy Theory Forum is down the forum a bit; I suggest those trying to derail this thread with talk of "purges" and a secret plan by the elite to wipe out the population take this conversation there willingly or else they'll find themselves forcefully removed from the thread and staring at some points
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

From many other local News bulletins..
He has 103° Fever, Gastro symptoms, and was in Guinea treating Ebola patients for Doctors without Borders.
Was self-monitoring at home after Flying into JFK Airport via Brussels Airlines on Oct 17.
He's in Bellevue Hospital which is ostensibly equipped for the situation. (originally a TB hospital)

These high-riskers should NOT be flying commercial flights, nor should ANYONE from those nations without at least 3 week quarantines.

Lets hope it's a False alarm and alternative like Malaria/Flu/etc.
Test results late tonight.

Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC - CBS News
CBS NEWS - October 23, 2014, 3:23 PM

Someone gave out the wrong info on his fever. Not 103, but 100.3. For Ebola, that makes a big difference.
 
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

Wrong DS.....one can even spread it when Cured.

Sperm can contain the virus for a period of three to six months even after a person has been cured of EVD. The 21-day quarantine period remains ambiguous and we need more research to conclusively establish its basis,” added Dr Srivastava......snip~

Then don't swallow, and you'll be good!
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

If you are a highly trained medical doctor, and just witnessed first hand the deaths of Ebola in Guinea, and you return to the U.S.

Whether you feel well, or not, any responsible person, regardless of whether the government insists upon isolation, would place themselves voluntarily in a mode of low public contact and make of diary of all contact they do have, just in case.

If this person went to a public gathering, such as a bowling alley, given his level of training, exposure, and change of location from Africa to the relatively Ebola free area of the United States, we have to assume that for Political or Personal motivations, he is TRYING to deliberately spread the disease!

This man is, in my estimation, A TERRORIST!

This is a clear and present danger to the lives of hundreds of millions of Americans, and represents a valid case of deliberate Terrorism!
There is function, and then there is intent.

The challenge here is in understanding the general attitude towards Ebola of the very great majority of doctors.

They truly believe that the only way to catch Ebola is through contact with a very symptomatic patient's blood, vomit, or feces.

With the number of West African people with Ebola increasing, after spending just a month there treating the sick, he returns home, after having most likely had contact with a number of patients' blood, vomit, and feces, wearing less than adequate protection, adequate protection not universally available in West Africa, likely thinking, knowing as he does just how the disease is spread, that he may indeed have been sufficiently exposed to someone's blood, vomit, or feces, and monitoring his likely incubation period, and that if he does have the virus in him .. the best care is here in America.

So he flies to liberal Belgium .. probably not telling airport security that he's just had super high-risk contact with Ebola .. and then he flies from Brussels to New York, a flight that no one is really screening. So that gets him home, to where the best care is.

Believing, as he does, that no one is in danger from him, believing, as he does, that there's insufficient viral load in body fluids prior to showing symptoms, especially in saliva, he goes out about his business on the town. Heck, he even has contact with his fiancee (who is now forced into 21-day isolation that might cost her her job)!

He's likely correct, that no one was in danger from him if he's not symptomatic, or even if he's barely symptomatic .. likely correct.

But, the problem he misses isn't medical, it's sociological -- it's his "bedside manner" toward his fellow American citizens that stinks.

And, he's missing that his behavior will be viewed as just another "arrogant doctor".

And, he's missing the selfishness in his behavior, ironic considering his volunteer work in West Africa was anything but selfish.

What he apparently doesn't grasp is that the great majority of people don't believe the way the very great majority of doctors do on this matter. The great majority of people are still understandably intelligently concerned about Ebola .. about the 24 hours prior to experiencing classic symptoms .. about how much of the virus truly is in saliva during those last 24 hours prior to symptoms .. about what happens if the doctors are wrong or somehow a very poor person gets infected and doesn't go to the hospital but is cared for at home (how the epidemic spread in West Africa) .. about how long the virus can exist on surfaces in the cold and dark as winter approaches .. about how healthcare professionals can contract the disease from ER walk-in patients they care for prior to them testing positive and being placed in protective isolation (how the two nurses got Ebola from Duncan in Dallas) .. about how each new case of Ebola exposes the virus to a new host that may be the right environment for mutating to airborne .. about the effect of each new case of Ebola in America on Wall Street .. about how deadly the virus is, especially without proper treatment from the onset of symptoms, proper treatment so many of America's own poor can't afford .. about how special prevention of the spread of Ebola will thus be a taxpayer burden ...

The great majority of Americans are rightly concerned.

But, the very great majority of doctors aren't concerned about these matters (even if some virologists are).

Terrorism is intent.

Sociological ignorance and selfishness, no, these are not terrorism.

But they are bad.

To return to the heart of our country's most populous city, six days prior to experiencing symptoms he most certainly knew were likely, and walk around freely amongst the populous?

Professional arrogance and sociological ignorance and egocentric selfishness, and even self-preservation over moral imperatives? Yes.

Terrorism? No. His intention wasn't to do harm to others but to take care of himself.

His volunteer organization, Doctors Without Borders, does a wonderful volunteer service, putting themselves at known risk, helping the sick who cannot afford medical care. They are to be praised for that, most assuredly.

But, the problem I have with this organization and its members, is their political philosophy with respect to the ".. Without Borders" part: they have a tendency to have disdain for geopolitical units, treating one place in the world like any other, like, in this case, West Africa and New York City are just part of one big planet, without different laws, or healthcare, or you name it.

So his liberal "Multi-Cultural Internationalist" attitude is on display, which contributes to his pretty lousy "bedside manner" toward his fellow Americans.

But, a terrorist? No.

Nevertheless, he should have a stern talking to about the value of being sensitive to people not possessing the great medical body of knowledge he possess, and about being sensitive to his country's government that's now attempting to promote the sociological general welfare of its people and implement physiological and psychological protections for the American people ..

.. And about how, under the right host and conditions, a virus can mutate to airborne, especially after being passed from person, to person, to person .. in an epidemic like West Africa.
 
Last edited:
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

They may be talking about a small and/or theoretical risk. As a matter of principle, I favor giving health care workers the maximum protection possible. If Congress would need to appropriate funds to help make this possible, I would have no objections.


Nope.....not a small theoretical Risk. Here is a the kicker DS.....The CDC knew people in Africa wearing Hazmats Suits. Were still being infected.



Guidance from the CDC and WHO recommends the use of facemasks for healthcare workers providing routine care to patients with Ebola virus disease and respirators when aerosol-generating procedures are performed. (Interestingly, the 1998 WHO and CDC infection-control guidance for viral hemorrhagic fevers in Africa, still available on the CDC Web site, recommends the use of respirators.).....snip~


To summarize, for the following reasons we believe that Ebola could be an opportunistic aerosol-transmissible disease requiring adequate respiratory protection:

Patients and procedures generate aerosols, and Ebola virus remains viable in aerosols for up to 90 minutes.
All sizes of aerosol particles are easily inhaled both near to and far from the patient.
Crowding, limited air exchange, and close interactions with patients all contribute to the probability that healthcare workers will be exposed to high concentrations of very toxic infectious aerosols.
•Ebola targets immune response cells found in all epithelial tissues, including in the respiratory and gastrointestinal system.
Experimental data support aerosols as a mode of disease transmission in non-human primates......snip~
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Fact.....they don't know all there is to know.

Which still doesn't explain why this Doctor would lose all common sense and go out into a public place. Just coming from an Infected Country.


Not knowing everything doesn't mean we know nothing. He's not infectious, why should he not socialise, he's spent a long time away from family and friends. Do you think a doctor would put them at risk? Capitalising "Infected Country", is that supposed to make us fearful? It's silly, besides which how can a country be infected?
 
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

Then don't swallow, and you'll be good!

I wont have that problem.....since I am not Gay. But then how does that help you out, even if you don't swallow. Fluids on your face will still cause you to be infected.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

This guy is a Doctor.....an yet as a Doctor he shows us how even Doctors can be fools. This mope knew he was working with Ebola Patients. For 8 months he was in Guinea. He should have isolated himself Right off the top coming from the Infected Country.

Not only was he out bowling.....but he took the subway, then went out to the park.

Was also out jogging.....which he said he was feeling down then.
I read he flew to West Africa in mid-September, so he was only treating patients for a month .. still sufficient time to know when he likely got infected this time.

See my above post response to Kurmugeon.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

I read he flew to West Africa in mid-September, so he was only treating patients for a month .. still sufficient time to know when he likely got infected this time.

See my above post response to Kurmugeon.


Mornin OG. :2wave: This morning on CBS radio they stated he was in Guinea for 8 months treating Ebola patients. Also as a Doctor and knowing how people react with infectious diseases You would have thought he would have tried to make sure he didn't alarm people. Especially any of those around him.....that knew where he was or about him.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

He finished his service and came home more than a week ago. He was symptom free (and NOT infectious) until 10am today, when he reported sick and was taken to hospital with due precautions. Fear is a killer, as is ignorance. Screaming fire in a theater only makes a person look stupid.
Behaving as if one is attempting to set that fire, that makes a person look arrogant and insensitive.

The doctor's mistake is mostly sociological, but it's a big one.

The other part of the doctor's mistake is virological -- with all his medical knowledge, he's apparently ignorant that, if he, a White person, has the disease, he's increased the factors contributing to mutation to airborne: http://www.debatepolitics.com/health-care/204375-causes-virus-like-ebola-become-airborne-right-host.html.

Those with even the slightest left lean would do well to spend less time posturing to protect the federal executive branch and more time being sensitive to the great majority of their fellow Americans' legitimate concerns.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Behaving as if one is attempting to set that fire, that makes a person look arrogant and insensitive.

The doctor's mistake is mostly sociological, but it's a big one.

The other part of the doctor's mistake is virological -- with all his medical knowledge, he's apparently ignorant that, if he, a White person, has the disease, he's increased the factors contributing to mutation to airborne: http://www.debatepolitics.com/health-care/204375-causes-virus-like-ebola-become-airborne-right-host.html.

Those with even the slightest left lean would do well to spend less time posturing to protect the federal executive branch and more time being sensitive to the great majority of their fellow Americans' legitimate concerns.

OMFG. You really think NOT freaking out is to "protect" Obama?

The problem is that the vast majority of these concerns AREN'T legitimate. It's sheer panic.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

There is function, and then there is intent.

The challenge here is in understanding the general attitude towards Ebola of the very great majority of doctors.

They truly believe that the only way to catch Ebola is through contact with a very symptomatic patient's blood, vomit, or feces.

With the number of West African people with Ebola increasing, after spending just a month there treating the sick, he returns home, after having most likely had contact with a number of patients' blood, vomit, and feces, wearing less than adequate protection, adequate protection not universally available in West Africa, likely thinking, knowing as he does just how the disease is spread, that he may indeed have been sufficiently exposed to someone's blood, vomit, or feces, and monitoring his likely incubation period, and that if he does have the virus in him .. the best care is here in America.

So he flies to liberal Belgium .. probably not telling airport security that he's just had super high-risk contact with Ebola .. and then he flies from Brussels to New York, a flight that no one is really screening. So that gets him home, to where the best care is.

Believing, as he does, that no one is in danger from him, believing, as he does, that there's insufficient viral load in body fluids prior to showing symptoms, especially in saliva, he goes out about his business on the town. Heck, he even has contact with his fiancee (who is now forced into 21-day isolation that might cost her her job)!

He's likely correct, that no one was in danger from him if he's not symptomatic, or even if he's barely symptomatic .. likely correct.

But, the problem he misses isn't medical, it's sociological -- it's his "bedside manner" toward his fellow American citizens that stinks.

And, he's missing that his behavior will be viewed as just another "arrogant doctor".

And, he's missing the selfishness in his behavior, ironic considering his volunteer work in West Africa was anything but selfish.

What he apparently doesn't grasp is that the great majority of people don't believe the way the very great majority of doctors do on this matter. The great majority of people are still understandably intelligently concerned about Ebola .. about the 24 hours prior to experiencing classic symptoms .. about how much of the virus truly is in saliva during those last 24 hours prior to symptoms .. about what happens if the doctors are wrong or somehow a very poor person gets infected and doesn't go to the hospital but is cared for at home (how the epidemic spread in West Africa) .. about how long the virus can exist on surfaces in the cold and dark as winter approaches .. about how healthcare professionals can contract the disease from ER walk-in patients they care for prior to them testing positive and being placed in protective isolation (how the two nurses got Ebola from Duncan in Dallas) .. about how each new case of Ebola exposes the virus to a new host that may be the right environment for mutating to airborne .. about the effect of each new case of Ebola in America on Wall Street .. about how deadly the virus is, especially without proper treatment from the onset of symptoms, proper treatment so many of America's own poor can't afford .. about how special prevention of the spread of Ebola will thus be a taxpayer burden ...

The great majority of Americans are rightly concerned.

But, the very great majority of doctors aren't concerned about these matters (even if some virologists are).

Terrorism is intent.

Sociological ignorance and selfishness, no, these are not terrorism.

But they are bad.

To return to the heart of our country's most populous city, six days prior to experiencing symptoms he most certainly knew were likely, and walk around freely amongst the populous?

Professional arrogance and sociological ignorance and egocentric selfishness, and even self-preservation over moral imperatives? Yes.

Terrorism? No. His intention wasn't to do harm to others but to take care of himself.

His volunteer organization, Doctors Without Borders, does a wonderful volunteer service, putting themselves at known risk, helping the sick who cannot afford medical care. They are to be praised for that, most assuredly.

But, the problem I have with this organization and its members, is their political philosophy with respect to the ".. Without Borders" part: they have a tendency to have disdain for geopolitical units, treating one place in the world like any other, like, in this case, West Africa and New York City are just part of one big planet, without different laws, or healthcare, or you name it.

So his liberal "Multi-Cultural Internationalist" attitude is on display, which contributes to his pretty lousy "bedside manner" toward his fellow Americans.

But, a terrorist? No.

Nevertheless, he should have a stern talking to about the value of being sensitive to people not possessing the great medical body of knowledge he possess, and about being sensitive to his country's government that's now attempting to promote the sociological general welfare of its people and implement physiological and psychological protections for the American people ..

.. And about how, under the right host and conditions, a virus can mutate to airborne, especially after being passed from person, to person, to person .. in an epidemic like West Africa.


THAT----WAS----A-----GREAT----POST! I think you nailed it.
 
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

Friends do NOT expose Friends to Ebola!

-
Agreed.

What he did to his fiancee!

He most certainly knew he had had sufficient exposure, and he was likely counting down his incubation period.

Yet he had "contact" with his fiancee!

Now she is definitely at risk.

And now she is under 21-day quarantine.

And now she will experience lost time from work, that might harm her economically .. maybe put her job at risk, as WHO has stated the incubation period is now 42 days and what co-worker is going to want her back at the job before then!

Selfish .. very selfish .. .. and arrogant.
 
Re: Doctor being tested for Ebola in NYC

Not knowing everything doesn't mean we know nothing. He's not infectious, why should he not socialise, he's spent a long time away from family and friends. Do you think a doctor would put them at risk? Capitalising "Infected Country", is that supposed to make us fearful? It's silly, besides which how can a country be infected?

Infected Country or Countries is the term the MS Media uses.....did you want to take that PC BS to them, its their terminology?

who_rf_illustrated_map_of_ebola_outbreak.jpg


http://www.bing.com/images/search?q...nfected ebola regions maps&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=#a

What do you think it means by Levels of transmission in a Country? Uhm.....note the 2 areas in Liberia with no Transmission.

Hows the Rest of the Entire Country looking?
 
Last edited:
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

In a city as big as NYC??! Let's just hope and pray that this won't get out of hand!! I know this is being compared to Aids in it's early days, but at least the symptoms don't lie dormant for yrs,giving people time to infect hundreds of people over a period of time. If someone gets Ebola we'll know within 3 wks!

The conspiracy terrorist theories are hilarious!!! Come on people!
 
Re: Doctor rushed to Bellevue Hospital with Ebola symptoms went bowling a day earlier

Simpleχity;1063902957 said:
That a doctor did not self-quarantine after returning from West Africa's Guinea (Ebola infectious zone) is... highly disturbing.
Agreed.
 
Back
Top Bottom