• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,114
Reaction score
33,461
Location
SE Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0


The soldiers at the blast crater sensed something was wrong.
FROM 2004 TO 2011, AMERICAN AND IRAQI TROOPS REPEATEDLY ENCOUNTERED, AND AT TIMES WERE WOUNDED BY, CHEMICAL WEAPONS THAT WERE HIDDEN OR ABANDONED YEARS EARLIER.
It was August 2008 near Taji, Iraq. They had just exploded a stack of old Iraqi artillery shells buried beside a murky lake. The blast, part of an effort to destroy munitions that could be used in makeshift bombs, uncovered more shells.
Two technicians assigned to dispose of munitions stepped into the hole. Lake water seeped in. One of them, Specialist Andrew T. Goldman, noticed a pungent odor, something, he said, he had never smelled before.
He lifted a shell. Oily paste oozed from a crack. “That doesn’t look like pond water,” said his team leader, Staff Sgt. Eric J. Duling.
The specialist swabbed the shell with chemical detection paper. It turned red — indicating sulfur mustard, the chemical warfare agent designed to burn a victim’s airway, skin and eyes.
All three men recall an awkward pause. Then Sergeant Duling gave an order: “Get the hell out.”
What is a chemical weapon? Anybody want to guess?
 
I read this earlier today, most concerning were the "disincentives" to report these wmd's.

Its ironic that the same weapons that were dismissed by the left in the Iraq war were the deciding factor for Obama to go into Syria.
 
I read this earlier today, most concerning were the "disincentives" to report these wmd's.

Its ironic that the same weapons that were dismissed by the left in the Iraq war were the deciding factor for Obama to go into Syria.

What WMDs? What are you talking about? Bush lied and people died! What WMDs?
 
This will get suppressed. Then left will ignore it and keep telling the same old lie about bush. The media will cheer the way
 
The lack of conversation on this thread is completely expected.
 
Do we really need about 5 threads on this subject, so right wing neocons can try to feel good about themselves?
 
Back
Top Bottom