I see...now you feel the need to resort to a personal attack.
Alrighty then.
With regard to your question as to whether or not I'm retarded. Possibly, but not ignorant. How about you?
You think we might need to start minimizing the chance of extraterrestrial invasion despite the lack of evidence there might be one?
Have you ever heard the old saying, "if it's not broke, don't fix it"? So far there's no credible evidence that something is broke as a result of voter sabotage. If there was, then there are technologies and authorizes that exist that can detect methods used and ultimately disclose these phantom voters.
I suggest that somebody better come up with verifiable proof that our voting systems are clearly are unsecured or ineffective in such ways that it allows for certain groups, parties, or individuals to be capable, at will, of controlling the outcome of political contest.
Where is the irrefutable evidence that is clear to all persons, regardless of political lean?
Now, if evidence prevails. And a genuine need for substantially more secure voting methods is clear - then it needs to be done in a way that doesn't discriminate against any group or minority. That means insuring that those who might fall under such categories will be assisted in obtaining whatever is necessary to meet whatever standard is set to make voting more secure.
That will cost taxpayers. Taxpayers must be willing to go to any length to protect all citizens right to vote, regardless of sex, age, race, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, or ethic heritage.
Do you, without reservations, believe everything our government tells us? Do you believe everything that your party is telling all of it's supporters - regardless of the party name? For those who do believe everything governments and parties say...then that might fall under the category of being retarded, in some people's opinion. I prefer to believe such persons fall under the ignorant category.
