• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alaska ban on same-sex marriage ruled unconstitutional

In the absence of a gay gene, there is no scientific evidence that being gay happens at birth. That is why liberals never talk about that issue

We do talk about that issue, and you don't understand genetics at all. I'd answer this, but you're still not admitting your shift in argument.
 
Loving decision was a black woman wanting to marry a white man which met the requirements of marriage in the state of Va. meaning the union of a man and a woman. You seem to not be able to understand that concept.
That wasn't the state of Va's requirement. The state of Va's requirement was a man and a woman of the same race.

I would have thought someone who is married to a man would understand the difference between two different sex couples getting married vs. same sex. Would you want your kids to be raised in a family with a same sex couple vs a couple with a man and a woman? Fair question, answer it
I would want my kids to be raised by me. I'm not sure what this question is supposed to mean.

Further one more time, I AM FOR STATES' RIGHTS AND MARRIAGE IS A STATE ISSUE. IF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE VOTE FOR IT I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM WITH THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. GET IT YET??????

Further one more time EQUAL PROTECTION STILL APPLIES TO STATE LAWS. GET IT YET? THIS WAS LAID OUT IN LOVING, WHICH YOU PREVIOUSLY TOLD ME TO REFERENCE. YOUR OWN ARGUMENT IS THAT LOVING WAS A CORRECT DECISION, THEREFORE EQUAL PROTECTION APPLIES TO STATE LAWS.
 
Sounds like the N.C. education escaped you as you don't understand if it is in the Constitution it is a requirement for the state to adhere to those issues and race is in the Constitution, marriage isn't

Noticed that you didn't answer my question, why is that?

Gender is a federally protected right under the Const, as you have admitted. So scream all you want, it is not a state's rights issue.

marriage:
man and woman
man and man
woman and woman

See the red? GENDER
..........
 
Same sex marriage is now legal in Arizona!

Glad to see my home state doing something good for a change!
 
Angry-Palin1-300x225.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom