- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,509
- Reaction score
- 11,236
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If you do, you're up against centuries of philosophical and theological thought.
Do you know that when I was your age homosexuality was in the DSM III as a personality disorder? This whole "gay rights" thing, perpetrated by a tiny minorty by design, is a new concept. It is more of a political movement than it is a moral or philosophical movement. Some of us see it for what it is. Some of us don't.
You want to present yourself as a critical thinker on these forums but going along with pop culture is not critical thinking, it's just front running.
And the question then is why was it put into the DMS III (and earlier versions) to begin with. Was it because it was a mental disorder that inhibited the individuals ability to function in society, or was it philosophical, social, and theological thought against homosexuals that justified and resutled in it's placement there.
Many are willing to question the removal of sexual orientation from the DSM, I've rarely seen anyone question it's placement there to begin with.
>>>>