- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,150
- Reaction score
- 10,634
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Thanks for the softball. First, there is no pro-discrimination side in this. Second, all men can marry women, all women can marry men. No one has to, many don't. That covers everyone. And third, I really don't like when people decide to use the government, unconstitutionally, to force their desires on everyone else. That has to be stopped, it undermines our society. If SSM happens, it needs to happen within the rules that we have set up. You can't have an entire State vote on an issue, and then when you lose, get one person to flip it. What the Hell was the vote for???
You'd have to ask Alabama, they voted to ban interracial marriage and it was "flipped" by the federal courts when measured against the United States Constitution.
And ya, there is a "pro-discrimination side", it those that want to exclude same-sex couple from Civil Marriage.
BTW - It's not "one person", there is the District Judge, the Cirucuit Judges, and the Supreme Court.
But I notice you failed to provide an answer to the direct question. Have a nice day.
>>>>