Re: Michael Dunn found guilty of 1st-degree murder in loud-music trial
Yea and my name is gullible, lol.
Okay Gullible.
I would suggest you officially change your name so that others know.
No it's not actually. Excons argument amounts to "Lets just take the guys word for it."
Wrong again. Figures.
Yes you would IF you had no other evidence. In this case, he was shown to be lying.
Wrong again. No evidence was presented showed he was lying.
....and the word THUG don't forget, ya gotta call the victim a THUG, then murder is OK and it's open season on un-armed black teens.
Threatening violence like Davis did makes one a thug.
If he played his music too loud some here would call him a THUG and dismiss him as being expendable.
Stop talking nonsense.
That kid is a hero, but the rest of what you said is unadulterated nonsense.
Clearly it was not, or he would not have been convicted of first degree murder.
This was a case of a guy who was disrespected, got angry, killed a teenager because of it, and tried to claim self defense to keep himself out of prison. Fortunately it didn't work.
Wrong again as already shown.
So again.
It was a case of self defense.
The individual threatened to kill him and pointed something at him which appeared to be a gun.
Anybody should be entitled to fire under those circumstances.
Funny thing here is that the tripod/stand was found under the seat yet nobody suggested that a leg of that is what he could have pointed at him through the window.
Davis threatened him and got out of the vehicle to carry through with that threat.
No evidence showed he wasn't in fear.
And he certainly was as demonstrated by grab his firearm in self-defense.
You're arguing in circles here. You're saying that he was justified in getting his gun to shoot the kid because he feared for his life. And the evidence that he feared for his life was the fact that he grabbed his gun so he could shoot the kid.
No. That is not arguing in circles.
Saying such is more of a reflection on your thoughts about it.
Going for your gun in self defense certainly shows you are in fear. Duh!
Stop with the nonsense.
There was no threat.
Only stupid people would claim otherwise.
Only stupid people would claim there was none, especially as Davis was getting out of the vehicle to carry through with it.
You clearly know not of what you speak.
But I suppose you think he was getting out to give Dunn a kiss, right?
Good. That's what you get for killing someone in a fit of rage.
False narrative.
Did anyone expected Dunn will go out of this trial without a prison for shooting teenagers because they were playing laud music?
He didn't shoot at anybody because of loud music.,
Saying such is a mischaracterization of what happened.
Dunn shot Davis because Davis became a threat.
Davis even got out of the vehicle to carry through with that threat.
That is why he was shot. Not because the music was loud.
and yet the OP thinks he's a hero for gunning an unarmed kid down over some loud music.
Hey PoS, stop talking about stuff you do not know.
^^^^
TRANSLATION: It is a shame that we can't lynch niggers anymore and get away with it.
Your translator is broken and your comment is idiotic.
Every time some butthead posts "Chicago" in one of these threads, somebody should post this.......
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/v/t1.0-9/995249_466749930101016_909403525_n.jpg?oh=e4d36cc9d24001762c3a4f2d4cc67993&oe=5486B3FC&__gda__=1421992477_be0440b0d69dad6fb84314bfd3a6665b[IMG][/QUOTE]
Why deflect with something that rarely happens?
Deal with what is posted. Don't deflect with **** that rarely happens.
[QUOTE="danarhea, post: 1063823679, member: 1377"]This was a man who shot through the back of a car that was attempting to leave, thus murdering a black man. Your hero is a murderer.[/QUOTE]:naughty
This was a man who was firing on a threat who had jumped back into a vehicle who's driver attempted to pull away. A vehicle in which it could not be seen if the threat was preparing to fire back.
That vehicle then stopped feet away from the rear of Dunn's car. The threat was still there. It had only moved, but had not been eliminated.
And until a vehicle in such circumstances is far enough away, the person in it is still a threat until such time as it can be determined that he is not.
[HR][/HR]
[QUOTE="Superfly, post: 1063823524, member: 15241"][url=http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2013-03-20/story/prosecutors-dispute-friends-jordan-davis-fled-after-shooting]Prosecutors dispute that friends of Jordan Davis fled after shooting | members.jacksonville.com[/url]
Besides, according to all the Dunn apologists, aren't they saying that that's how they got rid of the "mystery weapon?" Now either they left or they didn't. Y'all need to make up your minds.[/QUOTE]Showing you do not understand the evidence.
They traveled into another parking lot. Over 400 feet away.
The police didn't immediately search that area. And it wasn't searched until days after they were informed.
So yes they could have disposed of something immediately and it not have been found. Especially as it was, IIRC, the drivers aunt and cousin who were in the area at the time. The driver called them instead of 911. And he even lied about that.
