There you go speaking delusional biased nonsense again.
You are not going by the evidence at all. It is why you continually avoid discussing it after it is shown that it isn't in your opinion's favor.
Nor do you know if they disbelieved him or not.
They very well could have believed him but thought that it wasn't reasonable to use deadly force in such a situation.
Or, as you were also previously told:
We saw from the first trial one Juror who wanted to convict simply because she believed he had other options, like rolling up a window, moving to another space, etc...
That clearly is not applying the law as it is written.
If any juror who convicted him this time did so for that reason, his conviction should not stand.
The fact remains that at this time (which I keep pointing out, and you fail to grasp) we do not know why the jury decided what it did.
But what remains clear is that there is no credible evidence that contradicts his account of acting in self defense.
Nothing provided by you or anyone else, or the false claims of racism, show otherwise.
Nothing.
But nooooo, :doh you keep going in circles because you have no valid argument.
No it doesn't. If it did you could point to it, yet can't.
But for a gun, even Davis's friends testimony supported what Dunn said.
And yet, even though pointed out multiple times, you fail to grasp that. :doh
:2rofll:
No, you clearly don't.
He has no lame excuse. He reacted out of fear, which is exactly what the evidence supports, which again, no evidence disputes. So you are again telling lies.
More untrue nonsense from you.
As previously pointed out, a local Florida poll indicated roughly a 61/38 split, and as I stated: "While I may be in the minority I am not the only one."
So you are again speaking more nonsense, as others do agree, and the fact is as stated, you can not argue the evidence.
The lunacy is all yours, as you are showing your bias and a failure to look objectively at the evidence in toto of this specific instance.
Smith was a credible witness. The problem is that what he testified to was not.
He stated that he was able to hear Dunn, who was behind closed windows and facing away from him, at a specific point in time, say: "You're not going to talk to me that way".
The fact that Dunn was behind closed windows and facing away from him makes what he says questionable at it's best.
But then, Davis's friends and Dunn both say during that specific period in time, that what was said was a similar: "Are you talking to me."
Obviously Smith is mistaken.
But because of your preconceived racial bias you want to believe what Smith said is the truth. Too bad, the other and more supported evidence contradicts it.
