And you know they're false claims because you are clairvoyant. I understand.
It is the evidence that makes the claims false, so all you show you understand, is your dishonesty in discussing this.
I asked a series of questions. If you know the answers are all no, just say that.
Stop playing games.
Again.
I see you chose not to understand what it means. Figures.
But I must say I am surprised that you seem to think that patrol Officers would be doing the work of another's agencies Detectives.
How odd.
No, they didn't talk to any witnesses, none of the Ferguson police saw anything, heard anything, none will testify if there is a trial, etc.
:doh
More irrelevancy to that being discussed.
Their wearing of bracelets does not influence any investigation, as they are not investigating it. It is like you do not understand that.
Nor does wearing a bracelet have any influence on the irrelevancies you mention above. You are doing nothing but speaking nonsense.
If you've been paying any attention, at best we have conflicting accounts. You know which of the conflicting accounts are true and which are false because you're clairvoyant, but others don't have this gift and so are relying on investigations and a grand jury to work out the conflicts, at least to some extent.
This is nothing more than a failure on your part to pay attention and discern.
People copying what others initially said, does not make for conflicting reports, especially when those initial reports have since been shown to be false.
Shot in the back, shown to be false.
The initial witnesses have changed their account from his hands were up surrendering, to they were just going up a little.
Not moving towards the Officer, to evidence saying he was.
What is it you do not understand about the above?
Your failure to discern is not my problem, but it is yours.
Learn the evidence and learn how to look at it in toto.
Riiigggggghhhhttttt! And you're unbiased and only interested in the facts!
:lamo
Your absurd comment does not refute what I said.
They are protesting on a false narrative. And that is because they are irrational and likely don't care about the truth, only their biases.
Of course no one should oppose such. Why in the world would people who the officers serve want to know the names of the police officers involved in police actions?
You seem to be skipping over the fact that badge numbers suffice.
So again.
And the Officers not wearing or covering their name tags to protect their self and their families should be acceptable as well.
There is absolutely no rational reason why anybody should oppose such.
I have to say it's pretty funny that you just completely reverse the roles here. The police serve the people of Ferguson. You act like they have the right to tell the people they serve to go to hell if they don't like they way they're doing things. Let's just say that's a 180 from the normal conservative view of government employees.
You are speaking nonsense again.
I just don't have the gift of clairvoyance. Wish I did! In the normal world of ordinary humans, the evidence is conflicting.
One does not need to be clairvoyant to know that when the initial statement turned out to be fabrications that those that followed with the same info were fabrications as well.
Why you are not able to discern only speaks to your own bias.
The protestors are protesting based on a false narrative.