What if there is evidence this character is linked to Al Qaeda Leader Awlaki, the Boston Bomber's Mosque? That he was fired over an argument about stoning women.......... that on a facebook page he spewed radical Islam all over it praising those who have harmed us and continue to threaten to harm our citizens?
Oklahoma Beheader Linked to Al Qaeda Leader Awlaki, Boston Bomber's Mosque
Oklahoma Beheader Alton Nolen Celebrated Terrorists On Facebook | The Daily Caller
https://www.facebook.com/alton.threadgill
Yeah, nah...he was just your average non violent guy....
I'm sticking to what is known for now.
Oh for Pete sake, Awlaki a radical Imam and the Boston Marathon Bombers attended a mosque associated with him. The same Awlaki has ties to Oklahoma City.When a catholic priest molests children, we don't describe people who attended his church as "linked to child molestation."
Obama likes to get involved in small town America. Obama mentions Ferguson shooting in UN speech
Alton Nolen could have been his son.
Literally nobody has called this guy "non violent," for fairly obvious reasons. Explain this ridiculous straw man.
And honestly, people on this very message board use the same sort of language describing God's impending punishment for our acceptance of the gay agenda. This guy's rants seem focused on similar "sins," like drinking and smoking and screwing. I wonder if there was some sexual frustration involved in his selection of a victim, or a perception that the woman in question was a drinker/smoker/promiscuous.
Okay. But heads up (no pun intended) the local police department have called in the FBI to investigate Nolan. If they thought this crime was the result of some disgruntled employee, the FBI would not have been called into the case. According to the police interview what they have discovered about the beheader warranted calling in the FBI.
The "national uproar" as you put it was brought about by race hustlers, and news outlets bent on promoting the Obama/Holder agenda of racial dividing for political gain. But your question was in why should Obama comment on this situation, and I would say that we have a situation where Obama is now using the Bush doctrine to go after the terror army ISIS, a known morph of AQ, whom he said they had decimated, and all but killed (which was a lie ofcourse). You can find the hypocritical truth of that by simply asking yourself why he doesn't say a thing about the hundreds of black on black shootings of a similar nature in Chicago every year...Not a peep from him on that Nooooo. Why? Because it wouldn't have furthered the false narrative that America is still a racist nation...Which ofcourse is just a cover for him to dodge any criticism for the terrible job he does as President by being able to evoke racism at any criticism.
Man, when you progressives are wrong you are really wrong....
"Washington (CNN) – As terrorism increasingly becomes a tactic of warfare, the number of attacks and fatalities soared to a record high in 2012, according to a new report obtained exclusively by CNN.
More than 8,500 terrorist attacks killed nearly 15,500 people last year as violence tore through Africa, Asia and the Middle East, according to the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism."
Terrorist attacks and deaths hit record high, report shows – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs
Now this is the total of murders in the US in a given year...
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total 15,087 14,916 14,224 13,752 12,996
EconomicPolicyJournal.com: How People Are Murdered in the United States
Now by looking at this even though the numbers are 2012 for terrorism, and 2010 for murders, they represent the latest numbers out by these organizations, and even comparable in amount. But, the number of terrorist killings in the world at this point in time outweighs the number of homicides in the US. So we can conclude about your statement here that either you pulled the number out of your arse, or are just plain out lying about it in order to diminish the state of war Obama has us in today, against the enemy that has called for exactly this scenario to occur. Either way, it is a bogus argument.
What a silly comparison you made...You are comparing worldwide terrorism with murders in the United States. Make the comparison as I did between international terrorism on U.S. soil, and murders in the United States.
Hmm...That's not what you said though.
I stated the following:
"There are an average of 44 murders per day in the United States (by far the highest in the developed world). Everyone of them is a tragedy. Do you want the president to address the nation for each and every one of them? We kill each other in this country at quite a rate. Hell more people die from murder in any given year in this country then terrorists would killed in at least a couple of centuries."
I guess I could have been more clear, but its pretty obvious that when I pointed out the number of Americans in this country murdered every year and compared that to how many terrorism kills, I meant in this country as well.
It certainly made international news after Obama took the time to discuss it at the UN. He omitted the ongoing chaos in Chicago though.You do realize Ferguson made international news, and countries had many responses to it right?
It certainly made international news after Obama took the time to discuss it at the UN.
Obama is a trivial man, speaking of trivial events but, unfortunately, this trivial man is head of a world superpower. If you believe that the world is interested in the goings on of Ferguson Missouri then you fit right in with his constituency.Awwhhhh yes. Obama should of not of talked about it at all! Only once he did, did it become a story! How dare he!
Obama is a trivial man, speaking of trivial events but, unfortunately, this trivial man is head of a world superpower. If you believe that the world is interested in the goings on of Ferguson Missouri then you fit right in with his constituency.