• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl[W:641]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

It'll be coming, in another thread where it belongs--and you know it .

You said Conservatives have treated Obama's family in the same disgusting manner that Leftists have done for Palin's family...let's see a link.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

You said Conservatives have treated Obama's family in the same disgusting manner that Leftists have done for Palin's family...let's see a link.

He/She is asking his/her employer if that is allowed.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

My new thread just hit the forum .
You said Conservatives have treated Obama's family in the same disgusting manner that Leftists have done for Palin's family...let's see a link.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

See my new thread if you can stand to.
More links will be coming .
He/She is asking his/her employer if that is allowed.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

See my new thread if you can stand to.
More links will be coming .

What forum is it in?
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

US Partisan Politics and Political Platforms--where it belongs--
I'm done here for now as per the warning--
What forum is it in?
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

86 to 92. Go peddle your road apples somewhere else. I know better.

86 to 92 you say, that would be during the one of the best trained and equipped military America ever had.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

She was until she let Bush make an ass out of her regarding WMD in Iraq posing a threat of "mushroom clouds" appearing in the US. Bush ruined Powell's political career too.

And Dumbass Republicans wonder why 90-plus percent of Blacks vote Democrat.

No they don't, they already know why.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

You're wrong again. Most people that pronounce words incorrectly lack education and are ignorant. But hey if it makes you feel superior keep making stuff up.

Sure a lot of east coast Harvard grads who pronounce Oregon as Or-a gone. :lamo

edit:
Just remembered something, how did JFK pronounce Harvard ? :lamo
 
Last edited:
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Nearly 600 posts and you still don't have a legitimate criticism of Sarah Palin. The best you all can come up with, is she's a dingbat? :lamo

It's obvious that Sarah isn't a dingbat, at least an educated person would know that.

>"A dingbat is an ornament, character or spacer used in typesetting, sometimes more formally known as a printer's ornament or printer's character. The term continues to be used in the computer industry to describe fonts that have symbols and shapes in the positions designated for alphabetical or numeric characters."<
Dingbat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Utter bullsheet. Military service is akways a plus when applying for a job. You just keep making up more and more stuff.


You would think military service would be a plus when applying for a job, but it wasn't always so.

You seem not be to be to familiar with the 70's.

If your knowledge of the 70's comes from a Hollywood left sitcom, you might be considered misinformed or uninformed and would be very likely have voted for Obama.

The 1970's was the era of liberal led anti U.S. militarism. It would take Ronald Reagan to bring a stop of it.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Those were test scores and not transcripts. There would be no good reason to post student transcripts. Good grief you fail again.

>"In United States education, a transcript (Cumulative Record File, CRF, permanent record, or simply record) is a copy of a student's permanent academic record, which usually means all courses taken, all grades received, all honors received and degrees conferred to a student. Basically receiving all of your records from the first day of school till the school year now..."<

Transcript (education) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Some of us personally know people that have applied and been accepted. And I was told by those people (dated one) that the hard part was getting in. She was first in her class in high school and aced an undergrad chem degree and still was not a shoe in to Harvard Law. Anyone with a brain knows competition to get into Harvard undergrad and law school is very intense. People from all over rhe world apply.

From the Harvard Review mouth:

>" Twenty editors are selected based solely on their competition scores. Fourteen editors (two from each 1L section) are selected based on a combination of their first-year grades and their competition scores. The remaining editors are selected on a discretionary basis. Some of these discretionary slots may be used to implement the Review's affirmative action policy."<
http://harvardlawreview.org/about/
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Keep family out of it. It's not cool to talk about other people's families unless they are here to defend themselves.

What user names are the Palin's using on the DP ?
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

You would think military service would be a plus when applying for a job, but it wasn't always so.

You seem not be to be to familiar with the 70's.

If your knowledge of the 70's comes from a Hollywood left sitcom, you might be considered misinformed or uninformed and would be very likely have voted for Obama.

The 1970's was the era of liberal led anti U.S. militarism. It would take Ronald Reagan to bring a stop of it.

This isn't the 70's. How about the 50's when anyone deemed a commie by that scumbag McCarthy was blackballed from their job or worse.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

This isn't the 70's. How about the 50's when anyone deemed a commie by that scumbag McCarthy was blackballed from their job or worse.

Back in the 50's they did things the right way.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Back in the 50's they did things the right way.

I'm sure you believe that. Sad really. My marriage would be null and void because of the colors of our skin. Truly a wonderful era.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

I'm sure you believe that. Sad really. My marriage would be null and void because of the colors of our skin. Truly a wonderful era.

Really sad when I see how many misinformed people there are who have been indoctrinated in liberal revisionism. It's really sad. It helped put a community organizer in the White House.

Although anti-miscegenation amendments were proposed in United States Congress in 1871, 1912–1913 and 1928, a nationwide law against racially mixed marriages was never enacted.

But we are talking about state anti-miscegenation (interracial) laws, aren't you ?
You identify living in New York.

Well it all depends where you lived and if those laws were actually enforced.

Anti-Miscegenation Laws, State by State (includes date of statehood):
1. Nine states never had any laws of this type:
Alaska (1959) (Palin Country)
Connecticut (1788)
Hawaii (1959)
Minnesota (1858)
New Hampshire (1788)
New Jersey (1787)
New York (1788)
Vermont (1791)
Wisconsin (1848)

2. Eleven states repealed anti-miscegenation laws before 1887:
Illinois (1818)
Iowa (1846)
Kansas (1861)
Maine (1820)
Massachusetts (1788)
Michigan (1837)
New Mexico (1912)
Ohio (1803)
Pennsylvania (1787)
Rhode Island (1790)
Washington (state)

3. Fourteen states repealed anti-miscegenation laws between 1948 and 1967:
Arizona (1912)
California (1850)(Ca. repealed their law in 1948)
Colorado (1876)
Idaho (1890)
Indiana (1816)
Maryland (1788)
Montana (1889)
Nebraska (1867)
Nevada (1864)
North Dakota (1889)
Oregon (1859)
South Dakota (1889)
Utah (1896)
Wyoming (1890)

4. Sixteen states saw their anti-miscegenation laws overturned by Loving v. Virginia in 1967:
Alabama (1819)
Arkansas (1836)
Delaware (1787)
Florida (1845)
Georgia (1788)
Kentucky (1792)
Louisiana (1812)
Mississippi (1817)
Missouri (1821)
North Carolina (1789)
Oklahoma (1907)
South Carolina (1788)
Texas (1845)
Tennessee (1796)
Virginia (1788)
West Virginia (1863)
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Yep. Kept them negroes, women and Mexicans in their place. Hoo rah.

No no no, President Eisenhower's "Operation Wet Back" didn't keep the Mexicans in their place, one million were rounded up and deported back to Mexico and another one million saw that Esienhower was serious upholding his oath of office and they self deported themselves back where they belong.
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

Really sad when I see how many misinformed people there are who have been indoctrinated in liberal revisionism. It's really sad. It helped put a community organizer in the White House.

Although anti-miscegenation amendments were proposed in United States Congress in 1871, 1912–1913 and 1928, a nationwide law against racially mixed marriages was never enacted.

But we are talking about state anti-miscegenation (interracial) laws, aren't you ?
You identify living in New York.

Well it all depends where you lived and if those laws were actually enforced.

Anti-Miscegenation Laws, State by State (includes date of statehood):
1. Nine states never had any laws of this type:
Alaska (1959) (Palin Country)
Connecticut (1788)
Hawaii (1959)
Minnesota (1858)
New Hampshire (1788)
New Jersey (1787)
New York (1788)
Vermont (1791)
Wisconsin (1848)

2. Eleven states repealed anti-miscegenation laws before 1887:
Illinois (1818)
Iowa (1846)
Kansas (1861)
Maine (1820)
Massachusetts (1788)
Michigan (1837)
New Mexico (1912)
Ohio (1803)
Pennsylvania (1787)
Rhode Island (1790)
Washington (state)

3. Fourteen states repealed anti-miscegenation laws between 1948 and 1967:
Arizona (1912)
California (1850)(Ca. repealed their law in 1948)
Colorado (1876)
Idaho (1890)
Indiana (1816)
Maryland (1788)
Montana (1889)
Nebraska (1867)
Nevada (1864)
North Dakota (1889)
Oregon (1859)
South Dakota (1889)
Utah (1896)
Wyoming (1890)

4. Sixteen states saw their anti-miscegenation laws overturned by Loving v. Virginia in 1967:
Alabama (1819)
Arkansas (1836)
Delaware (1787)
Florida (1845)
Georgia (1788)
Kentucky (1792)
Louisiana (1812)
Mississippi (1817)
Missouri (1821)
North Carolina (1789)
Oklahoma (1907)
South Carolina (1788)
Texas (1845)
Tennessee (1796)
Virginia (1788)
West Virginia (1863)

We were talking about the 1950's which you seem to love and think everything was done just right. True I live in NY but what if I decided to move for a new job or God forbid retire to a warmer climate. I guess I would have to get a divorce first before moving to Virginia. You think a married couple consisting of a black, catholic, naturalized citizen and a white, agnostic, Jew would be welcomed in South Carolina in the 1950's which is where my neighbors are planning to retire?
 
Re: Sarah Palin's Family Allegedly in Alaska House Party Brawl

We were talking about the 1950's which you seem to love and think everything was done just right. True I live in NY but what if I decided to move for a new job or God forbid retire to a warmer climate. I guess I would have to get a divorce first before moving to Virginia. You think a married couple consisting of a black, catholic, naturalized citizen and a white, agnostic, Jew would be welcomed in South Carolina in the 1950's which is where my neighbors are planning to retire?

The question is, were you married during the 1950's ? If not, then don't get your pantties all wadded up over something that didn't affect you.

But you didn't move from N.Y. did you ?

And you know you wouldn't retire in a warmer climate because you couldn't handle being surrounded by Americans who cling to their guns and bibles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom