• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Woman beheaded in broad daylight in a London garden[W:335:480]

Your facts are not more valid than mine and I got mine from all the same major news outlets as you did.

Your " facts " have been completely hit and miss.

First you claimed that the police stood by as Lee Rigby was murdered........... they didn't because he was already dead when they arrived

Then you claimed they stood there filming one of the murderers going on his rant, when that footage was made by a passerby.

You may have read about the event from the same media sources I have but obviously you didn't understand what they were saying

Welp, I am glad you think nothing from here on out will happen. "because of the gun lobby". WTF, that makes no sense.

In a country where it is legal for nearly everyone to carry a gun/guns , it makes sense that all of the police also have them.

In a country where hardly anyone is allowed to have a gun , it makes sense that not all police officers need to be armed with guns

Makes sense to me
 
Your " facts " have been completely hit and miss.

First you claimed that the police stood by as Lee Rigby was murdered........... they didn't because he was already dead when they arrived

Then you claimed they stood there filming one of the murderers going on his rant, when that footage was made by a passerby.

You may have read about the event from the same media sources I have but obviously you didn't understand what they were saying



In a country where it is legal for nearly everyone to carry a gun/guns , it makes sense that all of the police also have them.

In a country where hardly anyone is allowed to have a gun , it makes sense that not all police officers need to be armed with guns

Makes sense to me
So you don't know what happened for sure in England, and you don't know much about US gun laws. Got it.
 
He seems a lot better informed than you do as to what happened in England.
 
So you don't know what happened for sure in England,

The account I gave stands up to scrutiny , yours does not. That's why I told you to get your facts straight before you commented. Nothing has changed

and you don't know much about US gun laws. Got it.

My reference was actually to a gun culture. Far more prevalent in the US than here. Are you saying that that is somehow wrong ? You do like to dig big holes for yourself imo
 
The account I gave stands up to scrutiny , yours does not. That's why I told you to get your facts straight before you commented. Nothing has changed



My reference was actually to a gun culture. Far more prevalent in the US than here. Are you saying that that is somehow wrong ? You do like to dig big holes for yourself imo
You thinking our gun culture is what is keeping them from coming here?
 
You thinking our gun culture is what is keeping them from coming here?

Who is " them " ? Unarmed police officers ? Terrorists ? Polar bears ?
 
In a country where it is legal for nearly everyone to carry a gun/guns , it makes sense that all of the police also have them.

In a country where hardly anyone is allowed to have a gun , it makes sense that not all police officers need to be armed with guns

Makes sense to me
You highlight the difference between citizens and subjects.
 
You highlight the difference between citizens and subjects.

So what , it doesn't alter the gist of what I was talking about does it ?

You have your guns but you have lost your freedom from the dangers of authoritarian rule regardless due to the legislation passed after 9/11
 
So what , it doesn't alter the gist of what I was talking about does it ?

You have your guns but you have lost your freedom from the dangers of authoritarian rule regardless due to the legislation passed after 9/11
Subjects have never been free and thus esteem freedom far less than citizens who, by right are free. You highlight the differences between a free people and subjects of the monarchy.
 
So what , it doesn't alter the gist of what I was talking about does it ?

You have your guns but you have lost your freedom from the dangers of authoritarian rule regardless due to the legislation passed after 9/11
It is true that we are seeing the state devour our liberty and freedom. That process began right after we freed ourselves from the yoke of British monarchy and has continued unabated. We have the Article V process to enable us to rebalance the division of powers.

You, having never been free fail to recognize freedom's importance. About a fifth of Americans, liberals/Progressives, socialists, Marxists, and statists want what you want, state tyranny.
 
it is true that we are seeing the state devour our liberty and freedom. That process began right after we freed ourselves from the yoke of british monarchy and has continued unabated. We have the article v process to enable us to rebalance the division of powers.

You, having never been free fail to recognize freedom's importance. About a fifth of americans, liberals/progressives, socialists, marxists, and statists want what you want, state tyranny.

dnftt
 
I believe you just farted. Enjoy it. It is about the only true freedom you have ever known.

Must have been a strong one if you can smell it in Huntsville , AL.

Maybe a trip to the doctors is in order
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom