- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 5,729
- Reaction score
- 2,853
- Location
- Colorado mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Re: Attorney: New audio reveals pause in gunfire when Michael Brown was shot
Nonsense.
What you won't admit is that the three wounds; the thumb palm graze, the forearm graze and the upper arm graze are all consistent with the victim running or walking away from the shot direction.
OR that they are also consistent with being shot from the front with the hands raised in a surrender position.
I understand that you will never admit those observations to be true... and that you will cling desperately to a single phrase from Badens press conference ... But anyone here looking at the picture and the chart ( that Della Street is holding up) can easily see the logic in what I am talking about.
...Well Excon can you man up and admit that these observations CAN BE CONSISTENT with these postures and observations?
Or will you continue to stonewall this information surrendering any credibility for an impartial opinion that you may have left?
Hmmmmmm?
"... but they're from the front." Not in the front.
And is why it was explained that they could have been received moving forwards or backwards, but not in facing away from.
Which is also why the movement of the arm was explained. Such a shot could appear to have come from the back when it actually came from the front.
Nonsense.
What you won't admit is that the three wounds; the thumb palm graze, the forearm graze and the upper arm graze are all consistent with the victim running or walking away from the shot direction.
OR that they are also consistent with being shot from the front with the hands raised in a surrender position.
I understand that you will never admit those observations to be true... and that you will cling desperately to a single phrase from Badens press conference ... But anyone here looking at the picture and the chart ( that Della Street is holding up) can easily see the logic in what I am talking about.
...Well Excon can you man up and admit that these observations CAN BE CONSISTENT with these postures and observations?
Or will you continue to stonewall this information surrendering any credibility for an impartial opinion that you may have left?
Hmmmmmm?
Last edited: