• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150:507]

Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

That's what the forensic expert said. It's in the article. Take it or leave it.
She said that the gunshots that struck Mr Brown were from the front. Eyewitness accounts are that Wilson shot while Brown was walking away. That could be a shot that missed.
At least one bullet was recovered from a house across the street.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

You mean the execution / shooting.
That's all they saw.

Wow. At one point you claim you were not part of a lynch mob....go figure. You are walking the bigot walk and talking the bigot talk. You need to look deep inside and ask your inner child what the hell he is thinking because your rational adult has skipped.

You are not an investigator....you are not FBI.....you are not part of the investigation nor are you privy to everything the professionals have found so far. The toxic garbage you are spewing is part of the problem yet you seem to get off on it. All at the expense of a possibly innocent man. Get over yourself.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

Wow. At one point you claim you were not part of a lynch mob....go figure. You are walking the bigot walk and talking the bigot talk. You need to look deep inside and ask your inner child what the hell he is thinking because your rational adult has skipped.

You are not an investigator....you are not FBI.....you are not part of the investigation nor are you privy to everything the professionals have found so far. The toxic garbage you are spewing is part of the problem yet you seem to get off on it. All at the expense of a possibly innocent man. Get over yourself.
The evidence I have observed has brought me to an educated opinion and I am not shy about expressing it.
Just like you.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

The evidence I have observed has brought me to an educated opinion and I am not shy about expressing it.
Just like you.

No, not just like me. I know that I do not have enough information to make an informed, truly educated opinion and I realize how dangerous it is to make the kind of goofy, ate up assumptions you are.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

The police report SHOULD have been a matter of public record on the day it was filed. That is Missouri state law.
I believe the report is being held" so that it can be re-written to fit the evidence and get a murderer free.
BTW I am not alone in this suspicion.



They said tonight that no police incident report had been written or filed. How can that be?
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

He bumped his head on the car door when Brown pushed it back at him. No one was "beaten".
That was enough to piss Wilson off to the point where he wanted to kill an unarmed surrendering kid.
So that is exactly what he did.

I think, even eyewitnesses say there was a struggle in which Brown struck the officer?
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

I think, even eyewitnesses say there was a struggle in which Brown struck the officer?
No one has said outright that they saw Brown strike Wilson ...no one.
There were no marks or abrasions on Brown's hands, at the autopsy, that would indicate that he struck anybody.
It has been surmised so much that people are beginning to think it was observed and reported.
It is an invention.
Wilson got a bump on his head from the door of his car when Brown pushed the door back.
 
Last edited:
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

The police report SHOULD have been a matter of public record on the day it was filed. That is Missouri state law.
I believe the report is being held" so that it can be re-written to fit the evidence and get a murderer free.
BTW I am not alone in this suspicion.



They said tonight that no police incident report had been written or filed. How can that be?
There is now an excuse for a report written on Wednesday the 20th. No details. Just a statement that there was a homicide.
There is only one reason that the police would not write a report ... They know that this was not a justifiable homicide.
They know Wilson is a murderer.
The lack of documentation is a tacit admission of Wilson's guilt.
He is a murderer.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

No one has said outright that they saw Brown strike Wilson ...no one.
There were no marks or abrasions on Brown's hands, at the autopsy, that would indicate that he struck anybody.
It has been surmised so much that people are beginning to think it was observed and reported.
It is an invention.
Wilson got a bump on his head from the door of his car when Brown pushed the door back.


You're right, I couldn't find one witness that says they saw Brown actually strike Wilson, only that a struggle occurred.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

There is now an excuse for a report written on Wednesday the 20th. No details. Just a statement that there was a homicide.
There is only one reason that the police would not write a report ... They know that this was not a justifiable homicide.
They know Wilson is a murderer.
The lack of documentation is a tacit admission of Wilson's guilt.
He is a murderer.

Michael Brown Shooting: Why Ferguson Police Never Filed 'Incident Report' - NBC News

Stop your nonsensical rambling, and wait for the trial, before you jump to any more asinine conclusions.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

That's what the forensic expert said. It's in the article. Take it or leave it.
Odd. I said it was in the article. :shrug:
It is not a direct quote. And it does not say what you think it means, especially as they have told us that all the shots came from the front.

All the shots came from the front.
That is what you have to deal with.


How are you shot in the back of the head twice, those being the two final shots,
and fall toward the police officer?​
Here is the relevant part of the autopsy.


Maybe someone can point out where in the back of the head he was shot?
:shrug:


michael-brown-autopsy.jpg
There are no shots in the back of the head.


You need to try and understand what was meant within the context of the above, because it does not say what you held it out to say.
To understand, you need to tilt the mans head forward as if he is attempting to tackle/bum rush.

Watch the video at this link to get a better understanding of what he is pointing out and keep in mind that they already told you that all the shots came from the front.

Watch: How bullets struck Michael Brown
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

But the evidence does warrant a murder charge.
Only in some make believe fantasy world.


She said that the gunshots that struck Mr Brown were from the front. Eyewitness accounts are that Wilson shot while Brown was walking away. That could be a shot that missed.
:doh
Wrong.
That would have required a shot in the back of the head, of which there was none.


The evidence I have observed has brought me to an educated opinion and I am not shy about expressing it.
Wrong.
Illogic and irrational thoughts have brought you to such conclusions. As they are impossible by the evidence.


See.
:laughat:
I believe the report is being held" so that it can be re-written to fit the evidence and get a murderer free.
BTW I am not alone in this suspicion.
Nothing more than conspiratorial nonsense. All illogical and irrational.


This is exactly what Holder and the Feds are looking at.
Wrong. They are specifically looking for a civil rights violation which is the only authority on the matter they have. And with the Feds involved from the get, it is absurdly ridiculous to think that anything is being done as you illogical suggest.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

The police report SHOULD have been a matter of public record on the day it was filed. That is Missouri state law.
I believe the report is being held" so that it can be re-written to fit the evidence and get a murderer free.
BTW I am not alone in this suspicion.



They said tonight that no police incident report had been written or filed. How can that be?

The chief must be naive or something. Withholding the report makes the department appear suspicious of wanton cover up, if it is, the chief and the cronies must know the federal government indicts for obstruction and covering up or hiding evidence. Being forthcoming can remove doubt in people's minds. I wonder how many years in prison he and his cronies might get for that, and will the chief still be eligible for any retirement pay he might have coming to him from Ferguson taxpayers?
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

I wasn't debating. Get a grip.

If you're not debating, why are you at DEBATE POLITICS and posting on the website?
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

No, I actually think the pig was angry that he got his overbearing ass whomped by a 18 year old and has anger management problems. Put it this way, if you had a gun, and someone younger than you kicked your ****ing ass and you couldn't pull it out in time to prevent your ass kicking, and the ass kicker ran off, would you not pull your piece and kill the man who just kicked your ass because you wanted to exact some retribution? That's what I believe and think, but you can go down the leftist and liburul bull**** path if you wish, I just ain't going there with you.
In other words, you acknowledge and then defend an assault upon a police officer. Brilliant. But the stupidity doesn't stop there. You then go on to make up phony charges against the cop for which you have absolutely no evidence. More brilliance. And to take this down the liberal path, all the bad actors here are liberals--from the thug whom you acknowledge attacked a police officer, to the democrat voters who looted stores, engage in mindless chants and pointless protests, and then turn around and defend lawless behavior. But the ultimate truth is, this punk got just what he deserved. And the community, though too stupid to realize it, is a better and safer place without him around.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

They are specifically looking for a civil rights violation which is the only authority on the matter they have. And with the Feds involved from the get, it is absurdly ridiculous to think that anything is being done as you illogical suggest.

Wrong.
The Feds are looking for civil rights violations, and they may well find them, but they are also investigating a cover up and suppression of any and all evidence, and they will certainly find that.
Thomas Jackson, the Ferguson police chief, has botched every aspect of this case, from the failure to submit an incident report, to his press conference lies and his absurd declaration of a military war on the people of his city. Having his troops aiming military weapons directly at civilians in a peaceful demonstration alone is federal offense.
The lies and blatant impropriety are rife on the Ferguson police department.
Hound dog Holder and the FBI will not leave town without the Ferguson police's ass in a sling.
 
Last edited:
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

Michael Brown Shooting Key Witness Charged With Filing False Police Report: Dorian Johnson

Another hit on the credibility of the star witness, Mr. Dorian Johnson (in addition to the inconsistencies with the QuikTrip robbery footage and autopsy).
Dorian Johnson was charged with filing a false police report back in 2011, but he has never been convicted of anything relating to that incident. The charge is likely as bogus as everything else the Ferguson police do.
Nobody seems to take the filing of police reports very seriously in Ferguson...especially their police department.
They don't even see a need to file a report when an unarmed kid is gunned down in the street.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

In other words, you acknowledge and then defend an assault upon a police officer. Brilliant. But the stupidity doesn't stop there. You then go on to make up phony charges against the cop for which you have absolutely no evidence. More brilliance. And to take this down the liberal path, all the bad actors here are liberals--from the thug whom you acknowledge attacked a police officer, to the democrat voters who looted stores, engage in mindless chants and pointless protests, and then turn around and defend lawless behavior. But the ultimate truth is, this punk got just what he deserved. And the community, though too stupid to realize it, is a better and safer place without him around.
Not exactly, like putting words in peoples mouths or type? NOW, LET'S TALK ABOUT YOU FOR A CHANGE!
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

Your posts are hilarious and continue to show you know not of what you speak.

Isn't that funny ... Those are the exact same words you used talking about me when we discussed the Wafer McBride murder trial where a white guy murdered an unarmed black teen on his porch.
I obviously knew what I was speaking of then when the murderer was convicted of second degree murder and I know what I am speaking of right now.
You used the exact same wording when I said that in the loud music murder trial in Florida... Dunn would be convicted of murdering Davis, another unarmed teen killed by a white guy. The jury hung on the first degree murder conviction but Dunn is facing 75 years for the three counts of attempted murder of his friends in the same car as Davis.
I knew what I was talking about in those cases and I am correct this time as well.
Wilson is a murderer and he will go to trial for it and he will be convicted of, at the very least, manslaughter... probably second degree murder.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

Isn't that funny ... Those are the exact same words you used talking about me when we discussed the Wafer McBride murder trial where a white guy murdered an unarmed black teen on his porch.
I obviously knew what I was speaking of then when the murderer was convicted of second degree murder and I know what I am speaking of right now.
You used the exact same wording when I said that in the loud music murder trial in Florida... Dunn would be convicted of murdering Davis, another unarmed teen killed by a white guy. The jury hung on the first degree murder conviction but Dunn is facing 75 years for the three counts of attempted murder of his friends in the same car as Davis.
I knew what I was talking about in those cases and I am correct this time as well.
Wilson is a murderer and he will go to trial for it and he will be convicted of, at the very least, manslaughter... probably second degree murder.

His daddy, the chief might be going down the tubes too, the leaders of the city council should prohibit him from entertaining any further press conferences, one because he can't answer questions, two, withholding the police report, three, he keeps tripping over his own feet and stepping in it.
 
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]

Isn't that funny ... Those are the exact same words you used talking about me when we discussed the Wafer McBride murder trial where a white guy murdered an unarmed black teen on his porch.
:lamo You had no clue then just as you have no clue now. As it was he was guilty of manslaughter as I said.
He changed his story, that changed the way the evinced was viewed.

Which had absolutely nothing to do with anything you argued.



I obviously knew what I was speaking of then when the murderer was convicted of second degree murder and I know what I am speaking of right now.
:doh
Obviously you didn't.
What you argued had nothing to do with way the verdict came about.


You used the exact same wording when I said that in the loud music murder trial in Florida... Dunn would be convicted of murdering Davis, another unarmed teen killed by a white guy.
That is funny.
Pay attention. By Law he should not have been found guilty and he wasn't.
For you it always about race, which is why you keep bringing it up.
For me it is about the law and the evidnce, which is why I keep bringing it up.

The jury hung on the first degree murder conviction but Dunn is facing 75 years for the three counts of attempted murder of his friends in the same car as Davis.
And? I clearly stated that the jury had no choice is that issue. They were not allowed to consider that he was continuing to fire at the threat that he perceived.
If he walks this time around, that conviction has a great possibility of being overturned.


I knew what I was talking about in those cases and I am correct this time as well.
No you clearly didn't.
You have no track record of being right.


Wilson is a murderer and he will go to trial for it and he will be convicted of, at the very least, manslaughter... probably second degree murder.
:lamo That was funny.
The evidence has clearly been overwhelmingly in his favor. So thanks for the laugh.
You have no clue what the GJ will do. And with the recent news that Dorian has been charged with filing a false report, you are dreaming.
 
Back
Top Bottom