• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White students to no longer be majority at school[W:62]

'Racial bias' is based in reality and everyday real world experiences........there is not a predominately black school in the world where a White girl would not be sexually harassed.......with the administration looking the other way

The world, huh? The world's a pretty big place. I guess that means Black male students in London, England and throughout South Africa and Australia are all out to get themselves a White girl. :doh

Do yourself a favor, my friend. Move into the 21st century where today White women pursue Black men! Inner-racial relationships are commonplace and sexual harassment in the classroom or on-campus in most cases is promptly and severely handled. Come out of the Ward Cleaver '50s and into the year 2014.
 
Those decisions are simply based in reality........why would you send little Suzie off to a predominately black school where she will be sexually harassed, groped and maybe raped when you can move to another area where the schools are mainly White.......and there's actually learning going on in a nonviolent environment........that decision is not 'racist'.......it's just good parenting

It is racist to assume that sending "little Suzie off to a predominately black school" means that "she will be sexually harassed, groped and maybe raped."
 
LOL !!

Deliberately devaluing your currency when your'e dependant on Energy imports doesn't lead to prosperity.

It leads to continued economic malaise and thats exactly what Abenomics has produced.

Well that and more debt for a Country thats already borrowed itself into oblivion with one failed Keynesian " solution " after another.

Japans debt is 230 percent of their GDP and most of that debt is owned by the Japanese people and the Japanese banks.

Abenomics was a Keynesian " solution " to fix the damage from the last 10 Keynesian " solutions."

I wonder if youve read anything current regarding Abenomics

The topic is not about the details of Japan's long-term economic situation, the my point I am making, and proved, is that contrary to the claim, Japan is a relatively prosperous nation compared to most of the world despite being free of a significant Christian influence.
 
It is racist to assume that sending "little Suzie off to a predominately black school" means that "she will be sexually harassed, groped and maybe raped."

Maybe, but it would be a accurate assumption to say " little Suzy " would be recieving a sub-standard education.

Quality of education would be a relevent and far more likely concern when sending little ones off to School.
 
So a nation of immigrants must fear immigration?

OK. I guess. Not really.
Poll the LEGAL immigrants of this country and I'd wager you'll find more opposition to the illegals than in the general society.
 
Poll the LEGAL immigrants of this country and I'd wager you'll find more opposition to the illegals than in the general society.

Do you have a poll? And how would that make my the comment invalid?
 
Back
Top Bottom