- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 24,412
- Reaction score
- 10,441
- Location
- Upstate SC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq
Do you consider the "contributors" (not the guests, but people who are paid to be on Fox on a regular bases) as commentators? Almost always, when mis-facts are on Fox, it's one of these "contributors", and not the host of the show or a guest. What get's to me is that Fox allows the people to state mis-facts, and doesn't bother to correct them, so viewers typically just assume them to be true. Then Fox has these same people, who frequently present inaccurate data, on their show over and over again.
That old fart who used to be on Mash, he's the worst. Almost no statistic that he states is currently accurate, he cherry picks his data from particular months, sometimes from years in the past, and then presents these numbers as if they were true today or typical of our current situation. But he is far from the only one who does this.
I have no problem determining the difference between truth and fiction as well as hard news vs. opinion pieces. You don't seem to be able to distinguish that difference. Fox always has members of both sides in the debate and allows the viewers to decide. You claim Fox lies when the reality is you have provided no evidence to that point and attribute any false statement made by a guest as the opinion of the Fox Commentator.
There is right or wrong and you are on the wrong side of history as well as the wrong side of the economic spectrum that makes any sense at all. Personal responsibility, individual wealth creation, states handling social issues are what made this country great. Neighbor helping neighbor has always been our guiding principles but not any more as you and your ilk promote the Federal Govt. being that neighbor. Liberalism is a total and complete failure and the only economic principles that make any sense are conservative ones.
Do you consider the "contributors" (not the guests, but people who are paid to be on Fox on a regular bases) as commentators? Almost always, when mis-facts are on Fox, it's one of these "contributors", and not the host of the show or a guest. What get's to me is that Fox allows the people to state mis-facts, and doesn't bother to correct them, so viewers typically just assume them to be true. Then Fox has these same people, who frequently present inaccurate data, on their show over and over again.
That old fart who used to be on Mash, he's the worst. Almost no statistic that he states is currently accurate, he cherry picks his data from particular months, sometimes from years in the past, and then presents these numbers as if they were true today or typical of our current situation. But he is far from the only one who does this.