• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq[W:1007]

Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

This Current Occupant of the WH is an economic and foreign policy disaster. What a shame that leadership is so lacking with this President. I cannot believe he continues to have any support at all but then again that just goes to show that low information voters have no understanding of leadership, no understanding of personal responsibility, and no understanding of what it takes to manage foreign and domestic policy. I feel sorry for supporters because I tried to tell you in 2008 who you were voting for and you didn't listen. 4 million more got the message in 2012 but not enough to get rid of this incompetent. The American people and our country suffer today because of that decision

President Barack Obama vows to punish ISIS for beheading James Foley | Mail Online

And then he immediately headed for the golf course.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

I'm the one that realizes it much more than you. Which is why I've consistently said that the US should STOP advancing policies that embolden jihadist groups. How have you missed this very important premise of my chief criticisms of US foreign policy in the ME.

Which policies would those be? Be specific.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

It is states that sponsor this terrorism. You fail to realize that. Answering the question honestly however would incriminate your position.

As expected....you have failed.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

So if we occupied Iraq where are the U.S. owned oil wells? ISIS is thanks to Obama, Bush won the war and Obama lost the peace. That is reality.

And if bush hadn't lied us into the Iraq invasion, we wouldn't be facing the disease of ISIS today. They wouldn't exist. ISSIS would be a wet dream for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi/ al Qaeda in Iraq. More than likely he would be teaching Islamic studies as a preacher in Diyala province, to the north east of Baghdad, where he was during the bush invasion of 2003.:2wave:
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

And if bush hadn't lied us into the Iraq invasion, we wouldn't be facing the disease of ISIS today. They wouldn't exist. ISSIS would be a wet dream for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi/ al Qaeda in Iraq. More than likely he would be teaching Islamic studies as a preacher in Diyala province, to the north east of Baghdad, where he was during the bush invasion of 2003.:2wave:

Problem is Bush had nothing to do with the Iraq Liberation Act, nor British and German Intelligence, or the actual quotes of Democrats. Seems you have a very selective memory. The Reason for the invasion was in that Act as well as UN Resolution 1441
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

This is why you don't announce ahead of time when you're going to withdraw most of your forces. The only real answer to this is to send them back in.

There would've been no ISIS in Iraq had konservatives not ejaculated themselves in 2001 and put Dumbya into power, who decided to take out one of the few secular (Baathist) regimes that kept militant Islam under wraps.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

There would've been no ISIS in Iraq had konservatives not ejaculated themselves in 2001 and put Dumbya into power, who decided to take out one of the few secular (Baathist) regimes that kept militant Islam under wraps.

Bush won fair and square both times he ran, and Clinton decided to take out the Bathists-thats what regime change means.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

No. His comments still stand and we knew OBL ws responsible within hours.


I said Osama denied it at first. He said Osama admitted it immediately. You are making a non sequitur because i said nothing about what WE knew and when we knew it. Me and the facts say I'm right. Your friend is wrong... And by you backing him makes you wrong as well.

Interview with Osama bin Laden. Denies his Involvement in 9/11 | Global Research
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Bush won fair and square both times he ran, and Clinton decided to take out the Bathists-thats what regime change means.

Please cite when/where Clinton decided to "take out the Baathists."

Do you even know the difference between the Baath Party and ISIS, or the difference between the Baath and Shiite Islam? Can you explain it in your own words ?
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Please cite when/where Clinton decided to "take out the Baathists."

Do you even know the difference between the Baath Party and ISIS, or the difference between the Baath and Shiite Islam? Can you explain it in your own words ?

I know the difference well, but feel no need to jump through your hoops. What you appear to not know, is your history. Take heart-I have done your homework for you. You are welcome.
Iraq Liberation Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

I know the difference well, but feel no need to jump through your hoops.

In other words, you don't know the difference, because if you actually understood something in the Wikipedia article instead of just being able to search for it,

you wouldn't have posted something this incredibly stupid. . .

US Conservative said:
Bush won fair and square both times he ran, and Clinton decided to take out the Bathists-thats what regime change means.

Care to explain to us what "Bathists" Bill Clinton decided to "take out"? You know, none of us will take you seriously if you can't even explain your own posts :rolleyes:

Even palin couldn't have topped that one.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Problem is Bush had nothing to do with the Iraq Liberation Act, nor British and German Intelligence, or the actual quotes of Democrats. Seems you have a very selective memory. The Reason for the invasion was in that Act as well as UN Resolution 1441

You mean the act which has this section in it?

SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided n section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act.

One wonders at the amount of brainwashing it took to the minions to get this kinda brain-dead loyalty.SAD really.:(
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

You mean the act which has this section in it?

SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided n section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act.

One wonders at the amount of brainwashing it took to the minions to get this kinda brain-dead loyalty.SAD really.:(

The term "brainwashing" implies the use of propoganda to almost entirely obscure one's knowledge of the facts. That doesn't apply here, since US Conservative apparently believes that it was Clinton who "took out the Bathists."

In other words, he doesn't know the facts and really has no clue what he's saying.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

In other words, you don't know the difference, because if you actually understood something in the Wikipedia article instead of just being able to search for it,

you wouldn't have posted something this incredibly stupid. . .



Care to explain to us what "Bathists" Bill Clinton decided to "take out"? You know, none of us will take you seriously if you can't even explain your own posts :rolleyes:

Even palin couldn't have topped that one.

Regime does not mean leader. Party membership was expected, not just by Husseins military leaders, but his civil leaders as well.

Lemme guess, you dont understand who the nazi's were either.

So not in other words and yes, unlike you I again know the difference. You are welcome.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Regime does not mean leader. Party membership was expected, not just by Husseins military leaders, but his civil leaders as well.

That wasn't the question. You were asked what you meant when you said "Clinton decided to take out the Bathists."

Please, explain it to us. We're all waiting. . .
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

That wasn't the question. You were asked what you meant when you said "Clinton decided to take out the Bathists."

Please, explain it to us. We're all waiting. . .

I dont know what was in his head. I know he passed legislation that clearly stated Hussein had to go, followed by military strikes.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

You mean the act which has this section in it?

SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided n section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act.

One wonders at the amount of brainwashing it took to the minions to get this kinda brain-dead loyalty.SAD really.:(

Which of course was superseded by the Congressional Resolution passed by a Democrat Controlled Senate in October 2002 but again what does with the fact that the Iraq Liberation Act talked about WMD as well? The Iraq Liberation act was in 1998 and the war resolution was in 2002. Same wording in both
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

I dont know what was in his head. I know he passed legislation that clearly stated Hussein had to go, followed by military strikes.

Please cite when he actually "took out the Bathists."
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Please cite when he actually "took out the Bathists."

How are you missing this? I never said he did, I said he made regime change the policy of the US towards Iraq. Read post 758 again, but concentrate this time.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Which of course was superseded by the Congressional Resolution passed by a Democrat Controlled Senate in October 2002 but again what does with the fact that the Iraq Liberation Act talked about WMD as well? The Iraq Liberation act was in 1998 and the war resolution was in 2002. Same wording in both


I guess people believed the multitude of lies such as this one given on 1/28/03, in george the seconds State of the Union address.

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Bush adds Saddam has "tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production" and has "mobile biological weapons labs."

Add that lie to all the other lies made by the other war mongers in the administration and you gotta heaping foul smelling pile of ****. That’s the germ that bore us ISSA. Not a doubt in my mind.:(
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

How are you missing this? I never said he did,

Post 758 says "Clinton decided to take out the Bathists."

I said he made regime change the policy of the US towards Iraq.

If that was his policy, then why did Clinton not order an invasion to "take out the Bathists", whereas Dumbya did? Please explain.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Post 758 says "Clinton decided to take out the Bathists."



If that was his policy, then why did Clinton not order an invasion to "take out the Bathists", whereas Dumbya did? Please explain.

Again I never said I could read what was in Clintons mind (probably involves strippers and cigars) but theres no need-I commented on his actions.

If you read again, you will also see that at no point did I say Clinton DID order an invasion (I'd ask you to back that claim but we both know you cant), so again, you are welcome.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

Again I never said I could read what was in Clintons mind (probably involves strippers and cigars) but theres no need-I commented on his actions.

You still never gave us an example of when Clinton "decided to take out the Bathists."


If you read again, you will also see that at no point did I say Clinton DID order an invasion (I'd ask you to back that claim but we both know you cant), so again, you are welcome.

If he ordered no military action, then how can you say that he "decided to take out the Bathists" ?

Explain this contradiction.
 
Re: American Forces Said to Bomb ISIS Targets in Iraq

I guess people believed the multitude of lies such as this one given on 1/28/03, in george the seconds State of the Union address.

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Bush adds Saddam has "tried to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production" and has "mobile biological weapons labs."

Add that lie to all the other lies made by the other war mongers in the administration and you gotta heaping foul smelling pile of ****. That’s the germ that bore us ISSA. Not a doubt in my mind.:(

Better tell that to the Butler Commission who confirmed that happened
 
Back
Top Bottom