• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

America's Fed Up: Obama Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low, Poll Shows [W:256]

Have you seen another peanut farmer with a shot at a nomination? Community organizer is going to be a death sentence going forward.

Haven't seen any presidential candidates with the last name of Bush, either

Oh well, Jeb
 
No, but you were saying about Reagan was an actor AND had executive experience. It's not a distinction between Reagan and Carter. There are plenty, but that's not one of them.

I wasn't posting about Carter. I didn't mention him in that post as a comparison to Reagan. I mentioned Reagan in comparison to Obama. Not Carter.
 
When did I say anything about Obama's numbers and how they pertain in any way to Bush?

You may want to read my post in this thread that pertains to Obama's poll numbers before you say something that I never said.

Yes, like I said, you've joined in bashing Obama in a thread that says Americans are fed up with him at 40%, and managed to through his wife under the bus too. If 40% is fed up, what's 22%?
 
Yes, like I said, you've joined in bashing Obama in a thread that says Americans are fed up with him at 40%, and managed to through his wife under the bus too. If 40% is fed up, what's 22%?

What does his wife have to do with your claims about a post I didn't make comparing Obama's poll numbers to Bush's? Nothing.

I can post in any thread I want. As can you. I don't need to explain my reasons for posting in this thread to anyone. The topic was Obama's poll numbers. His poll numbers have nothing to do with Bush.
 
If you don't want to live in this country, you don't have to.

Neither do you. But the war of Northern Aggression was just that. Nothing more nothing less. Lincoln wanted to "unite" the nation by killing almost 800,000 Americans.
 
What does his wife have to do with your claims about a post I didn't make comparing Obama's poll numbers to Bush's? Nothing.

I can post in any thread I want. As can you. I don't need to explain my reasons for posting in this thread to anyone. The topic was Obama's poll numbers. His poll numbers have nothing to do with Bush.

What place does bashing Michelle have in a thread about Obama's poll numbers. But if the thread is going to diminish Obama on a 40% approval, then Bush was sunk @ 22%.
 
Neither do you. But the war of Northern Aggression was just that. Nothing more nothing less. Lincoln wanted to "unite" the nation by killing almost 800,000 Americans.

remind me agian which side fired the first shots at the battle of fort sumter?
 
What place does bashing Michelle have in a thread about Obama's poll numbers. But if the thread is going to diminish Obama on a 40% approval, then Bush was sunk @ 22%.

If you don't like my response to a question asked to me by another poster, you should report the post.

Bush's poll numbers have nothing to do with Obama's poll numbers. Someone else may want to engage you in a discussion about Bush's poll numbers.
 
If you don't like my response to a question asked to me by another poster, you should report the post.

Bush's poll numbers have nothing to do with Obama's poll numbers. Someone else may want to engage you in a discussion about Bush's poll numbers.

so basicly the only thing worthy of discussion of this thread is president obama's poll numbers, and by "discussion" i mean "repeatedly rant about how awful he is?"
 
Good deflection from the fact that Americans elected a B movie actor twice. The American electorate are quite surprising at times.

One could say that Reagan put in his time as a bit player until he found his starring roles, first as a Governor and then as President, whereas Obama was like the child actor who played Urkel and everything's been downhill since.
 
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/14643 AUGUST NBC-WSJ POLL.pdf



We constantly hear in here how Obama is doing such a great job from the progressive members. How when we say that the polls are against him, we are just not taking our information from the right sources, or we don't know how to read the polls....Well, here is a poll from NBC for God's sake....In all areas it seems that American's of ALL stripes are just fed up with this liar in office....

Domestically - 40% approve, 60% disapprove
Foreign policy - 30% approve 70% disapprove
Right track/Wrong track - 22% approve, 71% disapprove.....

etc...

This is clearly a contender, if not the winner of the absolute worst President this country has ever had.

We've had some bad ones, and as your post calls for a comparison, Bush was still much, much worse. Sorry.
 
Back
Top Bottom