- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Re: Bill Clinton: "I could have killed" Osama bin Laden.
Mornin' CPW. :2wave: That's Right.....like 10 times that he could have pulled the trigger on OBL. Plus don't forget this was after finding out AQ was responsible for the Attack on the USS Cole.
According to Michael Scheuer, Clinton’s administration had “about 10 chances” to kill Bin Laden in 1998 and 1999 and passed on all of them because the intelligence supposedly wasn’t good enough. I’d also like to know more specifics of what Clinton says here about his best shot at OBL.
Is he thinking, perhaps, of … Tarnak Farms? Tarnak Farms was located near Kandahar but it wasn’t a “little town.” It was Bin Laden’s training camp for terrorists. There may have been women and children there, but you could have cut a swath through AQ by bombing it at the time. In fact, the CIA might have had Osama himself onscreen from drone surveillance in 2000; drones weren’t equipped with missiles at the time, but an airstrike could have been called in.
Clinton says at one point that, had he bombed Bin Laden with civilians around him, “I would have been no better than him.” Does he still feel that way? Does he think Obama is no better than Al Qaeda for trying to neutralize threats from terrorists who take civilians as their main targets? Does Hillary think that? It’s 3 a.m. and the phone is ringing.....snip~
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/07/...-called-it-off-because-of-civilian-casualties
Noah Rothman writes over at Hot Air.
I am not certain what incidence Clinton is specifically describing in that speech. But I know he was offered more chances than that to end UBL, and passed on all of them.
As for 300 innocent people...... I am..... doubtful.
Mornin' CPW. :2wave: That's Right.....like 10 times that he could have pulled the trigger on OBL. Plus don't forget this was after finding out AQ was responsible for the Attack on the USS Cole.
According to Michael Scheuer, Clinton’s administration had “about 10 chances” to kill Bin Laden in 1998 and 1999 and passed on all of them because the intelligence supposedly wasn’t good enough. I’d also like to know more specifics of what Clinton says here about his best shot at OBL.
Is he thinking, perhaps, of … Tarnak Farms? Tarnak Farms was located near Kandahar but it wasn’t a “little town.” It was Bin Laden’s training camp for terrorists. There may have been women and children there, but you could have cut a swath through AQ by bombing it at the time. In fact, the CIA might have had Osama himself onscreen from drone surveillance in 2000; drones weren’t equipped with missiles at the time, but an airstrike could have been called in.
Clinton says at one point that, had he bombed Bin Laden with civilians around him, “I would have been no better than him.” Does he still feel that way? Does he think Obama is no better than Al Qaeda for trying to neutralize threats from terrorists who take civilians as their main targets? Does Hillary think that? It’s 3 a.m. and the phone is ringing.....snip~
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/07/...-called-it-off-because-of-civilian-casualties
Noah Rothman writes over at Hot Air.
Last edited: