• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Study Finds Elementary Students Like New Healthier Lunches

clownboy said:
Do you think what we're talking about here is a locally funded and conceived program, really?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure there is a program at all. That's why I asked that you show me a federal program.
 
Tucker Case said:
So you don't dodge them. Got it.
Click to expand...
More retardation from you, figures.


Tucker Case said:
Just because you can pretend to understand a definition does not mean you actually know what the word means.
Click to expand...
:doh
Say the guy who had to be given the definition of it. iLOL


Tucker Case said:
Hint: If the kids are indoctrinated, they actually believe they like it (The administrators beliefs have nothing to do with the kids' indoctrination).
Click to expand...
Says the guy who tried to confuse "like" with thinking something was healthy.

And yeah, you have no clue if the administrations opinion has anything to do with indoctrination, as what they perceive could very well be a result of it.


Tucker Case said:
You clearly don't know what the word means.
Click to expand...
:naughty
No, that was you as I had to provide you the definition.


Tucker Case said:
Saying "Wrong again" repeatedly without actually demonstrating the statement to be wrong does not change reality,
Click to expand...
:doh Of course stating the fact that you are wrong does not change the fact that you are wrong. That is just silly.


Tucker Case said:
The reality is that you don't know how to use the word in an intelligent, correct manner.
Click to expand...
Showing of course that you are only speaking of yourself.

Excon said:
indoctrinate
in·doc·tri·nate
[in-dok-truh-neyt]
verb (used with object), in·doc·tri·nat·ed, in·doc·tri·nat·ing.
1. to instruct in a doctrine, principle, ideology, etc., especially to imbue with a specific partisan or biased belief or point of view.
2. to teach or inculcate.
3. to imbue with learning.
​
Indoctrinate | Define Indoctrinate at Dictionary.com​


No matter how you want to view this, it is indoctrination.
Click to expand...

Excon said:
Pushing/teaching/indoctrinating anything the Gov does as right/good/healthy, etc... Is wrong.
Click to expand...
The Gov doing such is indoctrination, no matter how much you want to retardedly claim it isn't.



Tucker Case said:
Personally, I would blame it on the teachers who failed to "indoctrinate" you on how to use the English language at an adult level.
Click to expand...
Says the guy who has demonstrated a lack of knowledge concerning it's usage.
 
Cardinal said:
I don't think anyone's actually defended schools banning packed lunches. That's just a crappy policy through and through.

Sriracha sauce on cat **** would work too.
Click to expand...
And I don't think any schools have actually banned kids bringing lunches, not to my knowledge anyway. At our school, the principal did put her foot down about kids bring a huge bag of hot Cheetos and nothing else for their lunch. Talk about parent's responsibility, or lack thereof, that was a prime example.
 
Excon said:
More retardation from you, figures.


:doh
Say the guy who had to be given the definition of it. iLOL


Says the guy who tried to confuse "like" with thinking something was healthy.

And yeah, you have no clue if the administrations opinion has anything to do with indoctrination, as what they perceive could very well be a result of it.


:naughty
No, that was you as I had to provide you the definition.


:doh Of course stating the fact that you are wrong does not change the fact that you are wrong. That is just silly.


Showing of course that you are only speaking of yourself.



​
The Gov doing such is indoctrination, no matter how much you want to retardedly claim it isn't.



Says the guy who has demonstrated a lack of knowledge concerning it's usage.
Click to expand...

Again, just because you think that you comprehend something does not mean you do. You are a classic case of the dunning-kruger effect. You are clearly incompetent at comprehending that which you read, but you are so incapable of recognizing your own incompetence that you feel you are more competent than those who are.
 
Tucker Case said:
Again, just because you think that you comprehend something does not mean you do.
Click to expand...
This applies to you.

The definition was provided.
You obvious just can't comprehend it.



Tucker Case said:
You are a classic case of the dunning-kruger effect.
Click to expand...
iLOL :lamo
And again, describing yourself.
Your ignorance on what the actual definition says/means, leads you to have an undeserved confidence.


Tucker Case said:
You are clearly incompetent at comprehending that which you read, but you are so incapable of recognizing your own incompetence that you feel you are more competent than those who are.
Click to expand...
:doh
Said the person who can not comprehend the provided definition. That is so hilarious. iLOL :2rofll:
 
Dittohead not! said:
And I don't think any schools have actually banned kids bringing lunches, not to my knowledge anyway. At our school, the principal did put her foot down about kids bring a huge bag of hot Cheetos and nothing else for their lunch. Talk about parent's responsibility, or lack thereof, that was a prime example.
Click to expand...

There has been one school, somewhere in Chicago, but they were banned before the new guidelines on nutrition ever came out. The principle even says it was done over 6 years ago because of junk food being brought on field trips. Most people do not agree with this. It is one thing to limit what sorts of food a kid might bring to school, another to ban all lunches from home.

Another place where lunches from home have been banned is in preschools/head start programs. However, there have been no actual federal guideline that says they have to be banned provided, despite some schools, districts, or even states thinking otherwise. And some of them are being banned for other reasons besides base nutrition, among those being sanitation, potential allergies, no place to store them, and school liability issues. I imagine there are a lot of reasons that schools for preschool age children would not want lunches brought in. In fact, the school my son went to last year for speech had preschool classes that only lasted 3-4 hours, with two different sessions each day (one morning, one afternoon). The students only got snacks provided by the school in their classrooms.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Getting caught in a photo-op eating unhealthy food does not help her lame cause,
Click to expand...


You are wrong.Eating short ribs once in a while does not make her a hypocrite.Nor does it make her wrong that kids should eat healthy food. So what if someone took a picture of her eating short ribs. If she was eating unhealthy food every day then she would be a hypocrite. Going around nitpicking over her eating short ribs and going Moochelle like a immature elementary school kid only makes you look like a partisan hack.
 
jamesrage said:
You are wrong.Eating short ribs once in a while does not make her a hypocrite.Nor does it make her wrong that kids should eat healthy food. So what if someone took a picture of her eating short ribs. If she was eating unhealthy food every day then she would be a hypocrite.
Click to expand...

However, she is seen eating unhealthy food fairly often.


Going around nitpicking over her eating short ribs and going Moochelle like a immature elementary school kid only makes you look like a partisan hack.
Click to expand...

Partisan hack for which party? I am an independent. I just do not like nanny state government. I don't think the feds should have any influence on school lunches.
 
ObamacareFail said:
However, she is seen eating unhealthy food fairly often.
Click to expand...

A handful of incidences doesn't mean squat.

Partisan hack for which party? I am an independent.
Click to expand...

Of course you are, that is why you use the term Moochelle multiple times in this thread.

I just do not like nanny state government. I don't think the feds should have any influence on school lunches.
Click to expand...

You do realize the government is the one ordering the school lunches?
 
Excon said:
This applies to you.

The definition was provided.
You obvious just can't comprehend it.


iLOL :lamo
And again, describing yourself.
Your ignorance on what the actual definition says/means, leads you to have an undeserved confidence.


:doh
Said the person who can not comprehend the provided definition. That is so hilarious. iLOL :2rofll:
Click to expand...

Clearcut case of Dunning-Kruger.
 
Tucker Case said:
Clearcut case of Dunning-Kruger.
Click to expand...
Yes you are as you have repeatedly shown.
Your ignorance on what the actual definition says/means, leads you to have an undeserved confidence.

So again for your edification.

Excon said:
indoctrinate
in·doc·tri·nate
[in-dok-truh-neyt]
verb (used with object), in·doc·tri·nat·ed, in·doc·tri·nat·ing.
1. to instruct in a doctrine, principle, ideology, etc., especially to imbue with a specific partisan or biased belief or point of view.
2. to teach or inculcate.
3. to imbue with learning.
​
Indoctrinate | Define Indoctrinate at Dictionary.com​


No matter how you want to view this, it is indoctrination.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
jamesrage said:
Apparently not all kids are spoiled brats whose parents let them eat what ever they want and many other kids do like healthier food.

Study Finds Elementary Students Like New Healthier Lunches - WSJ
When the federal government implemented new school-meal regulations in 2012, a majority of elementary-school students complained about the healthier lunches, but by the end of the school year most found the food agreeable, according to survey results released Monday.
The peer-reviewed study comes amid concerns that the regulations led schools to throw away more uneaten food and prompted some students to drop out of meal programs.
Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago surveyed administrators at more than 500 primary schools about student reaction to the new meals in the 2012-2013 school year. They found that 70% agreed or strongly agreed that students, by the end of the school year, generally liked the new lunches, which feature more whole grains, vegetables and fruits, and lower fat levels.
Click to expand...

Those kids are being put in an environment were they feel its better. its not better, it sucked, and it used to be better in the past. We actually got fed.
 
Excon said:
Yes you are as you have repeatedly shown.
Your ignorance on what the actual definition says/means, leads you to have an undeserved confidence.

So again for your edification.

​
Click to expand...

I'm sure you can cut and paste sections of Einstein's theory of general relativity, too, but like that definition, but I'm equally sure you can't comprehend it.
 
Tucker Case said:
I'm sure you can cut and paste sections of Einstein's theory of general relativity, too, but like that definition, but I'm equally sure you can't comprehend it.
Click to expand...
Said the guy who can't comprehend the definition.
 
Excon said:
Said the guy who can't comprehend the definition.
Click to expand...

And with that, the dunning-kruger effect is officially renamed the "Excon's 'I know you are but what I am I, nanananaboo,stick your head in doo doo. I like chocolate pudding, especially when it comes from my pants' defense".
 
Tucker Case said:
And with that, the dunning-kruger effect is officially renamed the "Excon's 'I know you are but what I am I, nanananaboo,stick your head in doo doo. I like chocolate pudding, especially when it comes from my pants' defense".
Click to expand...
:dohAnd you are still wrong.
Nothing is going to change that.

And it really is funny as you are the one acting like they know it all yet can not comprehend the definition.
The Dunning-Kruger effect fits you to a tee.
Especially with all your juvenile nanananaboo doo-doo bs! :lamo
 
Excon said:
:dohAnd you are still wrong.
Nothing is going to change that.

And it really is funny as you are the one acting like they know it all yet can not comprehend the definition.
The Dunning-Kruger effect fits you to a tee.
Especially with all your nanananaboo doo-doo bs! :lamo
Click to expand...

Actually, the dunning-kruger effect DOES fit me to a tee. I often discover that I have overestimated the competence of others.
 
Tucker Case said:
Actually, the dunning-kruger effect DOES fit me to a tee. I often discover that I have overestimated the competence of others.
Click to expand...
Figures you apply to yourself the portion that doesn't apply to you. :doh
 
Excon said:
Figures you apply to yourself the portion that doesn't apply to you. :doh
Click to expand...

:shrug: I'm not the one telling a whole lot of people that my skills are superior to theirs. I'm just telling one individual who also happens to be telling everyone else that his reading comprehension is superior to everyone else's.


I don't expect you to understand what this fact implies, because I'm fairly certain at this point that you fail to comprehend the Dunning-Kruger effect adequately either, but the fact of the matter her is that one of us is assuming himself to be average competence while the other is assuming above average competence.

Now what do you think the dunning-kruger effect tells us about this particular phenomenon?
 
What a thread. We have to put food in our schools, its been **** food for decades, someone suggests we start providing healthier lunches and that becomes a political fight too!
 
ObamacareFail said:
However, she is seen eating unhealthy food fairly often.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question, but perhaps you didn't see it. I'll repost it:

I'm at my ideal bmi (give or take a pound) and like to have pizza and ice cream on occasion. My regular M.O. is to watch my calories and exercise regularly. Am I a hypocrite?
 
Tucker Case said:
:shrug: I'm not the one telling a whole lot of people that my skills are superior to theirs. I'm just telling one individual who also happens to be telling everyone else that his reading comprehension is superior to everyone else's.


I don't expect you to understand what this fact implies, because I'm fairly certain at this point that you fail to comprehend the Dunning-Kruger effect adequately either, but the fact of the matter her is that one of us is assuming himself to be average competence while the other is assuming above average competence.

Now what do you think the dunning-kruger effect tells us about this particular phenomenon?
Click to expand...
Still trying and failing I see.
You don't even comprehend the provided definition and yet you go on and on. :doh

And btw, pointing out that you are wrong is not claiming superiority. That is what you have been trying to do with your ignorant attacks.
 
Cardinal said:
You didn't answer my question, but perhaps you didn't see it. I'll repost it:

I'm at my ideal bmi (give or take a pound) and like to have pizza and ice cream on occasion. My regular M.O. is to watch my calories and exercise regularly. Am I a hypocrite?
Click to expand...

No. Easy enough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom