OldWorldOrder
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,820
- Reaction score
- 1,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Errr...No, that's not how it works.
Don't disagree there. It's just the old saying "It's only illegal if you get caught".
Many US officials have been all over the news declaring that the expulsion of the CIA chief in Germany is UNPRECIDENTED! There is more to this story than we all know about, and pretending that this was generic espionage and Merkel popped off a little to save face is just cover.
Angie got caught with her hand in the cookie jar and of course Ibama's weak ass is going to sit back and let her get away with it.
As an American, I think this is great news.
Germany is its own country. The US needs to stop fighting an intelligence war with Russia already in other peoples countries. It's rude and a waste of money anyways.
Ok tough guy. How many divisions would YOU be sending into Germany right now?
Why is it thst you Liberals only believe going to war and doing nothing?
If she believes that, she is as dangerous as I thought.
PS: Thank you for explaining the Stasi to me and reminding me of he CV.
Well I'm not a liberal, and I believe war is almost always un preventable. So what again do you think needs to be done to Merkel/Germany.
I would hunt down every German mole I could find and go public with the information.
Good points, thanksNo doubt, but I was approaching your question from an international perspective, and a socio-economic one.
Fair point - but as above, I was extending it to encompass more than Americans.
Of course, and as I have indicated elsewhere, I consider her right wing extremism to be a reaction to the extreme socialist environment of the then Soviet Union. I was in no way suggesting that her views were typically American, but they are embraced today by more Americans than Europeans, which is why I made mention of Atlas Shrugged.
What's wrong, Leo? You don't enjoy such things?
I asked you if you felt Europe was superior to the US. You wrote three paragraphs that didn't answer the question, aside from flirting with saying that in your subjective opinion it was. But that was only implied, not said. Hence I asked if that was a yes.
Now apparently you understand that it was rather rude to ask if multi-syllabic confused me? Or you just enjoyed saying it without foundation, but didn't enjoy it being thrown back at you, equally unfounded? Either way, Leo, the lesson here for you is if you can't answer the question, don't ****ing try.
Lets tell the whole story.
Two security researchers have found new evidence that legitimate spyware sold by British firm Gamma International appears to be being used by some of the most repressive regimes in the world.
Google engineer finds British spyware on PCs and smartphones
Well I'm not a liberal, and I believe war is almost always un preventable. So what again do you think needs to be done to Merkel/Germany.
Ok tough guy. How many divisions would YOU be sending into Germany right now?
Obviously they do see the need for spies, because the guy in question was a double spy. That means he was spying for the Germans, before he was spying for us.
I guess that's why we kicked their ass...twice!
Thanks for the link. I am not sure, what you want to point out, though. Other countries than the US spy pretty well too?
Well no, that wasn't my point. Another poster drew attention to Germany supplying dictators with spyware. They aren't the only ones that do that.
Of course they aren't. They are also not the only ones that supplied Syria with the means to manufacture the chemical weapons that the US are now trying to destroy nor the only suppliers to Iran's atomic weapons program. And even in the case of Auschwitz in the Sand they had cosuppliers, I am sure. Also the were not alone in siding with Saddam. But nobody had said that.
Ok, so are you a supporter of "democracies" supply spyware to dictators, or not?
In general no. There are situations imaginable, where spyware could be the better way to go.
Well apparently that's the way Germany feels about it. Though if humanitarianism was more than facade, no dictator would ever receive such aid.
You think siding with Stalin in ww2 was like selling nuclear technology to Iran in the 90s? I don't.
Where in the world did you get that from.