- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 65,217
- Reaction score
- 49,294
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Yes, there was an ice age scare during that period. 1970s Global Cooling Scare | Real Science
Could it be, like all the other scares we were warned about, that it is a scam? Why not follow the money, or look at increased government regulations and powers they received since concocting these scare stories for a gullible public? The Overpopulation Hoax – LewRockwell.com
Yeah, pretty much.
Myths busted at climate change conference | Human EventsBusting Myths
During the opening dinner, meteorologist Joe Bastardi explained extreme weather events are not becoming any more frequent or severe as the planet warms. To the contrary, Bastardi documented how hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, and other extreme weather events are declining in frequency and severity. To the extent there are short-term increases in extreme weather events at some places within the overall global decline, Bastardi showed those follow weather and climate patterns that existed long before recent global warming.
During the breakfast session on Day 2, Greenpeace cofounder Patrick Moore chronicled the radicalization of once-noble environmentalist groups. Standing before photographs of himself leading environmental protests and provocative actions against whalers and other corporate entitites, Moore explained how Greenpeace and other environmental activist groups are now harming human health and welfare by demanding so many resources be dedicated to the fictitious global warming crisis. True environmental progress would be made fighting for land conservation and other real environmental concerns rather than trumped-up global warming claims, Moore explained.
Patrick Michaels, a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists and former program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society, explained during the Day 2 luncheon how government research grants are promoting the false notion of an alarmist consensus. Large government research grants are handed out almost uniformly to scientists who will promote the idea of global warming crisis, which ensures more budgetary dollars for government agencies addressing the topic and subsequently more research grants for the participating scientists, he noted.
Not sure if I'd call these folks 'knuckle dragging' through. That would appear to be awfully bold and needlessly and unfairly dismissive for a valid position.