- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 104,071
- Reaction score
- 84,041
- Location
- Biden's 'Murica
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I'll be interested to see the voting makeup and the justification. I'm also wondering if this will have an impact on a company providing services as well.
This is what Obama gets for trying to compromise. He should have gone with true Socialized Medicine, which would have avoided this situation.
5-4 split.
(2)
The Government has failed to satisfy RFRA’s least restrictive means standard. HHS has not shown that it lacks other means of achieving its desired goal without imposing a substantial burden on the exercise of religion. The Government could, e.g., assume the cost of providing the four contraceptives to women unable to obtain coverage due to their employers’ religious objections. Or it could extend the accommodation that HHS has already established for religious nonprofit organizations to non-profit employers with religious objections to the contraceptive mandate. That accommodation does not impinge on the plaintiffs’ religious beliefs that providing insurance coverage for the contraceptives at issue here violates their religion and it still serves HHS’s stated interests. Pp. 40–45.
That would have been even a sweeter rejection by the courts. And this is what Democrats get for shoving legislation down Americas throats. Obamacare was held up by the SCOTUS only to have it's legs broken. Limp baby limp!
Hopefully, this will be the first major straw to break this bloated, ineffective camel's back.
......This is what Obama gets for trying to compromiseHe should have gone with true Socialized Medicine, which would have avoided this situation.BWAAAHHAHHAHHA
So, other than a couple of candid-caught-on-camera moments, why did he feel he had to lie about what he really wanted?
HERE ... Let me start you off ... because he knew if he told the truth it never would have <you complete it>
This is what Obama gets for trying to compromise. He should have gone with true Socialized Medicine, which would have avoided this situation.
Not really at all. All this ruling states is that contraception is not paid for by a family owned company. It isn't going to get rid of Obamacare.
Not really at all. All this ruling states is that contraception is not paid for by a family owned company. It isn't going to get rid of Obamacare.
I think that is a bit of an exageration that Obamacare's legs are broken. We will be reading about court cases for different aspects of Obamacare for years.
I still like your artwork though.. :mrgreen:
Nothing will get rid of Obamacare. But this decision certainly impedes it.