• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay marriage wins in Indiana and Utah

Never said they said it should be "illegal". I said they don't support it. I don't agree with gay marriage. And they come out of the wood work and justify their attempts at ridicule.
So clearly they have a problem with what I say and what I believe.

That isn't being against the 1st Amendment though as you claim. You are free to say what you want, but people are also free to criticize what you say as well. It's a two-way street there.

Freedom to say what you want doesn't mean you are free from criticism of what you say.
 
That isn't being against the 1st Amendment though as you claim. You are free to say what you want, but people are also free to criticize what you say as well. It's a two-way street there.

Freedom to say what you want doesn't mean you are free from criticism of what you say.
You are missing the point. Point is, shouting down someone that disagrees with you is part of the agenda I spoke of earlier.
Never defend the position only attack others. That is the liberal progressive way.
 
You are missing the point. Point is, shouting down someone that disagrees with you is part of the agenda I spoke of earlier.
Never defend the position only attack others. That is the liberal progressive way.

You claimed they were against the 1A and then used them attacking your comments as proof. Sorry, that doesn't cut it. You may not like the tactics of pro-SSM and how they ACT against anti-SSM people, but that isn't a 1A issue.

Just admit that and move on, because it isn't a 1A issue. If you want to talk about SPECIFIC tactics I'm more than happy too, but calling it a 1A issue against you is just simply false.
 
You claimed they were against the 1A and then used them attacking your comments as proof. Sorry, that doesn't cut it. You may not like the tactics of pro-SSM and how they ACT against anti-SSM people, but that isn't a 1A issue.

Just admit that and move on, because it isn't a 1A issue. If you want to talk about SPECIFIC tactics I'm more than happy too, but calling it a 1A issue against you is just simply false.
Its not legally a 1A issue, its just a failure of the pro SSM people to articulate their opinion without trying to be insulting, then doubling down and justifying their insults.
 
Its not legally a 1A issue, its just a failure of the pro SSM people to articulate their opinion without trying to be insulting, then doubling down and justifying their insults.

Well that action is not just limited to liberals. Whenever welfare, abortion or anything else is brought up many conservatives just throw up terms like socialist, Marxist, Baby-killers, and other insults as well. Polticial discourse has been gettign worse and worse and with the internet and anonyminity it makes it far easier for people to hurl insults without any reprocussions. This happens on BOTH sides on various issues. Its also something I am sad to say I have done as well without thinking about it at times.
 
Support what? The sissification of America, gay days at Disney, forcing gay marriage, forcing gay adoption, forcing the military to accept gays, screaming intolerance to anyone that don't agree with you. You mean THAT agenda?

So you only like butch gays, or 'bears', who have masculine traits.

Gotcha.

Not that there is anything wrong with that, of course. Whatever 'pitches your tent'.
 
Funny, Deuce keeps asking too. Apparently we missed it.

Can you provide some post numbers?

No, he hasn't been and look at the 30 to 50 range there was an entire discussion. You'd know this if you had been reading the thread.
 
You haven't contributed anything new in any of these threads so I wouldn't talk about rehashing.

Nor have you. Every time it's the same bogus arguments.
 
I do support the 1A, but just look at this thread and you will clearly see that the liberals on the board do not.

Why? How are we restricting your 1A rights in anyway? You have failed to demonstrate any harm that SSM will do to you and yours.

You can rant against it all you want...we all know you are free to do so. And free to reap the results of that.

But it sounds even sillier when you cant put any reasoning out there to support the ranting....nothing besides 'I dont like it'.

No one says you have to like it. The 1A doesnt protect you from being offended. You certainly dont mind making offensive remarks about gays.
 
Not everywhere. And I am sure you will say "yet". So you don't have to, I am sure the continued circling of the drain for America is for us to be come the next Sodom and Gomorrah.

You have yet to describe why that would happen with legal SSM. Care to now?
 
Its not legally a 1A issue, its just a failure of the pro SSM people to articulate their opinion without trying to be insulting, then doubling down and justifying their insults.

You mean things like 'sissification'?
 
Never said they said it should be "illegal". I said they don't support it. I don't agree with gay marriage. And they come out of the wood work and justify their attempts at ridicule.
So clearly they have a problem with what I say and what I believe.

Yes, just like you have a problem with what homosexuals do. The only difference is all the awful things you call homosexuals are apparently justified.
 
I said clearly "liberals on this board do not". I didn't say anything about the government or against the law. Quit with the strawman argument.


So wait a minute. If you weren't talking about government and yet you don't want to be called out for intolerant positions by other posters acting in a private capacity - are you saying they should or should not enjoy the same liberty to respond to intolerant positions with intolerance?



>>>>
 
Yes, just like you have a problem with what homosexuals do. The only difference is all the awful things you call homosexuals are apparently justified.
Quote me disparaging homosexuals.
 
Not everywhere. And I am sure you will say "yet". So you don't have to, I am sure the continued circling of the drain for America is for us to be come the next Sodom and Gomorrah.

Support what? The sissification of America, gay days at Disney, forcing gay marriage, forcing gay adoption, forcing the military to accept gays, screaming intolerance to anyone that don't agree with you. You mean THAT agenda?

How so? To show how "tolerant" we are of sick mindsets and lifestyles?

Dignity of our nation.

The gays win, America loses.

Its not about rights, its about gutting what America is.

Quote me disparaging homosexuals.

That's just half of this thread.
 
That's just half of this thread.

Calling it a sick lifestyle is just a matter of opinion. Don't like it? Oh well. That is not disparaging, its called an opinion. The rest you would have to have some real thin skin to get to the level of even alittle insulted about.
 
Calling it a sick lifestyle is just a matter of opinion. Don't like it? Oh well. That is not disparaging, its called an opinion. The rest you would have to have some real thin skin to get to the level of even alittle insulted about.

Well, I think if some people 'just stated an opinion' about your posts, they would get infracted!
 
Calling it a sick lifestyle is just a matter of opinion. Don't like it? Oh well. That is not disparaging, its called an opinion. The rest you would have to have some real thin skin to get to the level of even alittle insulted about.


So in other words...


................ Someone makes intolerant disparaging remarks about homosexuals = doesn't count.

................ Others call them on it or respond in kind = QUITE BEING INTOLERANT!!!!




That's what I'm hearing. That's just an opinion though, hopefully they have thick enough skin.



>>>>
 
Calling it a sick lifestyle is just a matter of opinion. Don't like it? Oh well. That is not disparaging, its called an opinion. The rest you would have to have some real thin skin to get to the level of even alittle insulted about.
The very definition of disparaging includes the word opinion:

disparaging: expressing the opinion that something is of little worth;

Your opinion is simply disparaging towards gay men and women, simple as that.
 
The very definition of disparaging includes the word opinion:



Your opinion is simply disparaging towards gay men and women, simple as that.
And I find the gay life style of little value. But I am not disparaging any particular individual. Like I said, if you are looking to get offended. Good job, you did it.
 
And I find the gay life style of little value. But I am not disparaging any particular individual. Like I said, if you are looking to get offended. Good job, you did it.
There you go, you just said it. To disparage is to express the opinion that something is of little value. You find gay men and women of little value, by your own admittance. Thus you are disparaging gay men and women.
 
Yes, just like you have a problem with what homosexuals do. The only difference is all the awful things you call homosexuals are apparently justified.

I have not seen any justification....can you please point out the post numbers?

j/k.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom