http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nst-obama-over-alleged-abuse-executive-power/
Where did the crybaby get his gonads at? Did he buy them or grow them? :lol:
How can an overly sensitive wimp come up with something like this? did he drink some tea or something?
Maybe Boener actually reads newspapers and listens to those who are smarter than himself ? Personally Obama's surge of illegal aliens at the border is when Obama crossed the red line in the sand.
Maybe Boener stopped and read the Constitution ?
But I noticed nobody on the DP mentioned George Wills column in the past few days while it was covered on most of the other political websites. Why was that ?
Obama Violates Separation of Powers
Monday, 23 Jun 2014 09:41 AM
By George Will
>" What philosopher Harvey Mansfield calls "taming the prince" — making executive power compatible with democracy's abhorrence of arbitrary power — has been a perennial problem of modern politics. It is now more urgent in America than at any time since the Founders, having rebelled against George III's unfettered exercise of "royal prerogative," stipulated that presidents "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
Serious as are the policy disagreements roiling Washington, none is as important as the structural distortion threatening constitutional equilibrium. Institutional derangement driven by unchecked presidential aggrandizement did not begin with Barack Obama, but his offenses against the separation of powers have been egregious in quantity, and qualitatively different.
Regarding immigration, healthcare, welfare, education, drug policy, and more, Obama has suspended, waived, and rewritten laws, including the Affordable Care Act. It required the employer mandate to begin this year. But Obama wrote a new law, giving to certain-sized companies a delay until 2016, and stipulating that other employers must certify they will not drop employees to avoid the mandate. Doing so would trigger criminal perjury charges; so, he created a new crime, that of adopting a business practice he opposes.
Presidents must exercise some discretion in interpreting laws, must have some latitude in allocating finite resources to the enforcement of laws, and must have some freedom to act in the absence of law. Obama, however, has perpetrated more than 40 suspensions of laws. Were presidents the sole judges of the limits of their latitude, they would effectively have plenary power to vitiate the separation of powers, the Founders' bulwark against despotism.
Congress cannot reverse egregious executive aggressions such as Obama's without robust judicial assistance. It is, however, difficult to satisfy the criteria that the Constitution and case law require for Congress to establish "standing" to seek judicial redress for executive usurpations injurious to the legislative institution..."<
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com
Separation of Powers Violated by Obama