• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cochran wins

Hicup said:
So much rage, how do you contain yourself? When I debate people like yourself in real life and personal, I always make sure that I keep a warm smile on my face as I destroy your progressive world ideology. We used to call it killing you with kindness, and folks such as yourself hate it. It drives you nuts that we have all the facts of history on our side, and ultimately progressives arguments boil down to "It is just because".. ;)



Tim-
Click to expand...
:roll:Whatever i contain myself just fine, you can't destroy anything, your side is a dying breed that's why you have been smoked by the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections, and the changing demographics in this country are killing your base, and helping mine, and you guy's can't win outside of the poor pathetic bible belt and south, that's what drives your party nuts, and why we see you clowns trying to shove your pathetic guns in everybody's faces..
Facts and history on your side?? LOL, keep looking back, the progressive's want to go FOWARD! GET IT, of course you don't..
 
Remember when the Tea Party tried to tell everyone how inclusive they were of republicans, democrats, whites, minorities?

Guess not.

Watching all the whining is hilarious...because people went out to vote, legally, and they were fired up, but the Tea Party is all butthurt becausethey want people fired up and voting...just not "those" people. :)
 
ARTHUR 1976 said:
:roll:Whatever i contain myself just fine, you can't destroy anything, your side is a dying breed that's why you have been smoked by the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections, and the changing demographics in this country are killing your base, and helping mine, and you guy's can't win outside of the poor pathetic bible belt and south, that's what drives your party nuts, and why we see you clowns trying to shove your pathetic guns in everybody's faces..
Facts and history on your side?? LOL, keep looking back, the progressive's want to go FOWARD! GET IT, of course you don't..
Click to expand...


LOL, oh please... Democrats, more specifically "Progressive" democrats, have been actively buying votes with the dollars of hard working American's since FDR. As more of the democrats move off the plantation, progressive politicians need to add more to make up the disparity. Rinse repeat. Granted they're becoming even more brazen of late adding illegal immigrants to the foray of future progressive voters, but the democratic party (For all that it is) is merely a collection of special interests groups that have to be kept in check, not by empowering them, but by enslaving them. It is a good philosophy in principle, because most young adults are liberal by nature, and it isn't until they start to contribute that they see what your ilk is really about. Some stay on the planation for life, some who are really die hard, such as yourself, perhaps, will probably never understand you're a pawn, a number to be used and re-used at the whim of the very political machine your engender. Most libs get it eventually and un**** themselves, the starry eyed among you stick it out regardless of the results of your ideology, and regardless of the incompetence of your progressive administrations. Progressive dems would never even think to dislodge an long time incumbent simply because we the people recognize that some times these people need to go. Congress has the worst approval ratings even lower than lawyers, yet we the people keep re-electing them. Why? Tea party people, such as my knuckle-dragging self, say you know what.. We need to change the status of political tenure and untouchable, and invincible notions of self importance and replace it with nobility, honor, integrity and pragmatism. We need to send a message to even our own beloved party that the status quo is no longer safe.

In short, we'll break from tradition if only to serve as a wake up call to our elected officials that we're watching, and we are demanding that you listen to us, or else!

Progressives would never think to dislodge one of their own, EVER!


Tim-
 
ARTHUR 1976 said:
:rofl, GOOD!!!!, ANOTHER LOSS FOR THE TEA MAGGOTS!!,

Notice how that other clown was endorsed by Palin, Santorum and the rest of that toxic cesspool, of inbred radical neo-cons...
Click to expand...

When you got progressives cheering the loss of a republican candidate and the win of another in a republican primary it only looks like republicans made the wrong choice. Because why would anyone want to vote for a candidate the opposition likes?
 
vesper said:
Oh please, stop the race baiting.
McDaniel is neither a racisit or a "kook" as some Republican elites and Democrats love to claim. He simply stands for less federal government growth, fiscal responsibility, and secured borders and constitutional first principles. It's Republicans like former Mayor Bloomberg who believe in things like food police, crony capitalism (corporatism), amnesty and carbon footprints, and a huge welfare system that dropped a quarter million into Cochran's coffers that wanted Cochran to win.

Cochran won but not within his own party. It took the others to drag that old man across the finish line. Does that stick in some folks crawl? You bet. Now McDaniel doesn't need to run as an Independent. His supporters just won't show up to vote on election day and the Democrat will win. To them they might as well let a Democrat take the office than hold their nose to vote for a guy who pretends to be a Republican. One way or another, Cochran is finished.
Click to expand...
craw
... Idioms
3.
stick in one's craw, to cause considerable or abiding resentment; rankle: She said I was pompous, and that really stuck in my craw.
Origin:
1350–1400; Middle English crawe, probably akin to crag2

Can be confused: craw, crawl, crow.
Click to expand...
Craw | Define Craw at Dictionary.com
 
ARTHUR 1976 said:
I hate them because they are a pro white, hypocritical group of radical anti Government scum, you like them so much go join them, and play with the losing side, i personally hope one of them runs against Hillary in 2016, so we can see the biggest landslide in the history of Government, can you see the irony of that???
Click to expand...

I have joined them and am part of a local Tea Party chapter for the past 3 years. They are not pro white, they are not hypocritical, and they are for limited government. By virtue of not lying about what we are or having to feel like lying about others we have already won. Instead of hate, you should aspire to understanding. Because someone told you to hate someone else doesn't mean you have to do it.
 
ARTHUR 1976 said:
:roll:Whatever i contain myself just fine, you can't destroy anything, your side is a dying breed that's why you have been smoked by the popular vote in 5 of the last 6 presidential elections, and the changing demographics in this country are killing your base, and helping mine, and you guy's can't win outside of the poor pathetic bible belt and south, that's what drives your party nuts, and why we see you clowns trying to shove your pathetic guns in everybody's faces..
Facts and history on your side?? LOL, keep looking back, the progressive's want to go FOWARD! GET IT, of course you don't..
Click to expand...

:shock:
 
beefheart said:
And, if that happens, the Tea Party will never win any election, they are topped out at a certain percentage, more importantly is the percentage of people who do not like the Tea Party, if they try to run as 3rd party, it will be an enormous failure.
Click to expand...

So be it. Maybe they win one seat though. Or take enough votes away from Dems and Reps to cause them pain.
 
ARTHUR 1976 said:
:rofl, GOOD!!!!, ANOTHER LOSS FOR THE TEA MAGGOTS!!,

Notice how that other clown was endorsed by Palin, Santorum and the rest of that toxic cesspool, of inbred radical neo-cons...
Click to expand...

You forgot racist :roll:
 
Ockham said:
I have joined them and am part of a local Tea Party chapter for the past 3 years. They are not pro white, they are not hypocritical, and they are for limited government. By virtue of not lying about what we are or having to feel like lying about others we have already won. Instead of hate, you should aspire to understanding. Because someone told you to hate someone else doesn't mean you have to do it.
Click to expand...

It's always satisfying to see someone spewing venomous hate at another person who doesn't give a crap. Bravo.
 
Ockham said:
I have joined them and am part of a local Tea Party chapter for the past 3 years. They are not pro white, they are not hypocritical, and they are for limited government. By virtue of not lying about what we are or having to feel like lying about others we have already won. Instead of hate, you should aspire to understanding. Because someone told you to hate someone else doesn't mean you have to do it.
Click to expand...
Yes, they are for limited government as long as their programs aren't touched. Try to cut Medicare or Social Security and you'll see how they fight for government. They also are a disjointed bunch. Their new pet peeve is the Export Import Bank, that actually earns the Treasury money and results in more manufacturing jobs.
 
Thrilla said:
yup, he's an earmark machine.... well schooled in diverting federal dollars to his state.

and somehow, liberals here are happy with that.... what a weird world.:roll:
Click to expand...
Mississippi is the poorest state in the Union. There is nothing wrong with bringing money into the state to help constituents.
 
Wiggen said:
Agreed. The Right wing loon would have been far easier for the Democrats to defeat. However, given that this is Mississippi, I don't think the Democrats have a hope in hell of winning that election regardless of who the Republican candidate was. Cochran is far less dangerous to the nation than the right wing loon.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. The far right, who think that Cochran is a traitor and is the same as a Democrat, may say home. Moreover, McD might run as a write-in and reduce Cochran by a few p%.
 
MTAtech said:
Yes, they are for limited government as long as their programs aren't touched. Try to cut Medicare or Social Security and you'll see how they fight for government. They also are a disjointed bunch. Their new pet peeve is the Export Import Bank, that actually earns the Treasury money and results in more manufacturing jobs.
Click to expand...

The group I'm with do like medicare and social security there's no doubt about that. They see these as beneficial for everyone and do want to preserve them. They do not however like wasteful spending, but also do not mind the government spending tax dollars wisely on things that may benefit others. I myself am probably more anti-government than most in the Tea Party as I can see 50% of government organizations going away without a problem. I doubt many in the Tea Party would agree with me.
 
MTAtech said:
Not necessarily. The far right, who think that Cochran is a traitor and is the same as a Democrat, may say home. Moreover, McD might run as a write-in and reduce Cochran by a few p%.
Click to expand...

I have been told Cochran is a big spending Republican - ie., liberal lite. He's not someone I would vote for if I had the choice.
 
The comedy just gets funnier.

McDaniel Voted as Democrat

McDaniel Voted as Democrat

RINO – Republican In Name Only – is a term used to describe people who are not truly Republican, they just run as a Republican on the ballot to get elected. Is Chris McDaniel a RINO?

He claims he is a lifelong Republican, but…

He voted in the Democratic Primary

“Records show conservative Republican U.S. Senate candidate Chris McDaniel voted as a Democrat in the 2003 state primary.” –Associated Press 11/13/2013

Chris McDaniel denied it. But, “McDaniel’s campaign spokesman Keith Plunkett said it is possible McDaniel voted in the 2003 Democratic primary.”

Mississippi’s Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann confirms it: “I looked at [the records], and they show he voted Democrat when Haley Barbour, Amy Tuck, Tate Reeves and Stacey Pickering were running in the Republican Primary. They also show he didn’t vote in the presidential election in 2004 — when Bush was running — and didn’t vote in the Republican Primary in 2008.”
Click to expand...
 
Thank goodness. Aside form Cantor this primary season has been a series of defeats for the Tea Party and I couldn't be more pleased for our party.
 
Wiggen said:
Indiana ain't Mississippi.
Click to expand...

Indiana is a northern state in name only.

Even Indiana folks on debate politics admit to the Confederate nature of IN,
which you'll remember was the leader of KKK Nation with over 300,000 members in the 1920's.

They were Dem during the civil war and flipped GOP as the rest of the South has.
Indiana's demographics are a mirror image of today's South .
 
Last edited:
NIMBY said:
Indiana is a northern state in name only. Even Indiana folks on debate politics admit to the Confederate nature of IN, which you'll remember was the leader of KKK Nation with over 300,000 members in the 1920's. They were Dem during the civil war and flipped GOP as the rest of the South has. Indiana's demographics are a mirror image of today's South .
Click to expand...

I acknowledge all of that is true. They still aren't Mississippi, however. If they were, they would never have sent Richard Lugar, a moderate Republican, to the Senate. Can you honestly imagine a moderate Republican ever being elected to anything in Mississippi? I can't.
 
Ockham said:
I have been told Cochran is a big spending Republican - ie., liberal lite. He's not someone I would vote for if I had the choice.
Click to expand...

Only in the bizarre world of Far Right politics would Thad Cochran be described as a liberal anything.
 
Wiggen said:
Only in the bizarre world of Far Right politics would Thad Cochran be described as a liberal anything.
Click to expand...

Big spending GOP members who never saw an ear mark they didn't like is what I call a Republican acting like a liberal.
 
Wiggen said:
I acknowledge all of that is true. They still aren't Mississippi, however. If they were, they would never have sent Richard Lugar, a moderate Republican, to the Senate. Can you honestly imagine a moderate Republican ever being elected to anything in Mississippi? I can't.
Click to expand...
Apparently a lot of people from all political persuasions think Sen. Cochran is a moderate Republican.
We've heard him called much worse by McDaniel's people, who could care less about the Gov't largesse Cochran brings home.

And let's not forget Sen. Trent Lott, who was certainly no TEA-partier.
South of the 40th parallel these days, you can't tell the difference between Mississippi, Illinois or Missouri--just to name a few .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom