• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi strike

Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

Here is why.

They attacked because they are terrorists. The video was the catalyst and the trigger.
The right wing must pretend to be too dense to grasp this simple concept.
The fear is that if this fact is more widely accepted then the narrative of "Obama lies" will be defused.
It already has been.
They are pissing into the wind.



No the Video wasn't the Catalyst or the Trigger.....which BO later talked about listening to the Chatter. Which they had been doing so Since the March Attack on the Same Consulate.

Clearly you have no clue as to what you are talking about. So thats just some more of that Wind you hear when you whiff. Just sayin!
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

bin Qumu? our old friend, the "AQ core" guy does get around, funny that Khatalla always gets the blame, but bin Qumu gets the Obama support, to overthrow Qadaffi.

Libyan "humanitarian war" ( going after Qaddafi and supporting the NTC AQ types)h was a very bad idea. I noticed Rand Paul at least mentioned today on Meet the Press

I'm becoming a bigger fan of Paul , he's the onlt one I know that calls out the Obama "regime change" on Qaddafi, when Qaddafi was anti-terrorist.

Another Obama screw up



Meet the Press Transcript - June 22, 2014 - NBC News
[/QUOTE]


Yeah, and I already brought out about the Photos released by the FBI the 3 accounted for. Then the Head of Ansar al Sharia for all of Libya. Plus our friend from Darnah.




The FBI believes other groups were also involved in the Benghazi attacks and is pursuing criminal charges against several individuals, including Abu Sufian bin Qumu, the leader of Ansar al-Sharia in the Libyan city of Darnah. Qumu has also been designated a terrorist by the State Department, as has his group.

In 2007, Qumu was released from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and sent to Libya, where he was detained. Gaddafi’s government released him in 2008....snip~
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

If we didn't make mean videos, there would be human rights and justice throughout the mideast. We're such jerks!

It's strange that those who claim Muslims will riot, destroy and murder over a video will also warn of the dangers of Islamophobia.
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

No the Video wasn't the Catalyst or the Trigger.....which BO later talked about listening to the Chatter. Which they had been doing so Since the March Attack on the Same Consulate.

Clearly you have no clue as to what you are talking about. So thats just some more of that Wind you hear when you whiff. Just sayin!
absolutely, it was a pre-planned attack
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

It's strange that those who claim Muslims will riot, destroy and murder over a video will also warn of the dangers of Islamophobia.



Yeah, and strange when The Libyans confirmed themselves there was no Protest. Plus then, We have the time when Stevens met the Turk Envoy. All before the Attack and no Protests.


Timeline:

The Obama administration immediately and persistently characterized what had occurred in Benghazi not as an act of terrorism, but as a spontaneous, unplanned uprising that happened, coincidentally, to take place on the anniversary of 9/11. Moreover, the administration portrayed the attack as an event that had evolved from what began as a low-level protest against an obscure YouTube video that disparaged Muslims and their faith. In reality, however, within a few hours following the attack, U.S. intelligence agencies had already gained more than enough evidence to conclude unequivocally that the attack on the mission in Benghazi was a planned terrorist incident, not a spontaneous act carried out in reaction to a video. Indeed, the video had nothing whatsoever to do with the attack.

Given these realities, it is likely that the Obama administration's post-September 11 actions were aimed at drawing public attention away from a number of highly important facts:

•the U.S. mission in Benghazi had never adopted adequate security measures;
the administration had ignored dozens of warning signs about growing Islamic extremism and jihadism in the region over a period of more than 6 months;
the administration, for political reasons, had ignored or denied repeated requests for extra security by American diplomats stationed in Benghazi;
the administration had failed to beef up security even for the anniversary of 9/11, a date of obvious significance to terrorists;
the administration, fully cognizant of what was happening on the ground during the September 11 attacks in Benghazi, nonetheless denied multiple calls for help by Americans who were stationed there;
the administration had been lying when, throughout the presidential election season, it relentlessly advanced the notion that "al Qaeda is on the run" and Islamic terrorism was in decline thanks to President Obama's policies;
the administration had hired members of the February 17th Martyrs' Brigade, a Libyan militia group with clear al Qaeda sympathies, to provide security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi; and
throughout 2011 and 2012 the administration had been lending its assistance to jihadists affiliated with al Qaeda, supposedly the organization that represented the prime focus of Obama's anti-terrorism efforts; moreover, some of those same jihadists had personally fought against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.....snip~
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

Here is why.

They attacked because they are terrorists. The video was the catalyst and the trigger.
The right wing must pretend to be too dense to grasp this simple concept.
The fear is that if this fact is more widely accepted then the narrative of "Obama lies" will be defused.
It already has been.
They are pissing into the wind.


No it wasn't. " The catalyst " was that it was September 11th and there was a poorly defended American embassy in the middle of a Terrorist infested Lybian City.

The Benghazi attack happened at 4pm Washington time, and by 10:30 Hillary Clinton released a press statement blaming the attack on a internet video.

That's Six and a Half hours to work up some BS about a Internet Video while our Embassy personal were being overrun.

4 days later , Clinton stood in front of the caskets of those four Americans and pushed the same BS narrative.

One day after that, Susan Rice lied her way through 5 Morning Talk shows.

If they knew it was a Terrorist attack all along, then why did they work so hard and fast to define the motivation for the attack ?

Why make such an assumption ?

Why work so hard to publicize what could only be a guess ?

I'll tell you why, they needed to politicized the deaths of those four Americans because a Terrorist attack that close to the Election was to much of a Political risk.
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

No it wasn't. " The catalyst " was that it was September 11th and there was a poorly defended American embassy in the middle of a Terrorist infested Lybian City.

The Benghazi attack happened at 4pm Washington time, and by 10:30 Hillary Clinton released a press statement blaming the attack on a internet video.

That's Six and a Half hours to work up some BS about a Internet Video while our Embassy personal were being overrun.

4 days later , Clinton stood in front of the caskets of those four Americans and pushed the same BS narrative.

One day after that, Susan Rice lied her way through 5 Morning Talk shows.

If they knew it was a Terrorist attack all along, then why did they work so hard and fast to define the motivation for the attack ?

Why make such an assumption ?

Why work so hard to publicize what could only be a guess ?

I'll tell you why, they needed to politicized the deaths of those four Americans because a Terrorist attack that close to the Election was to much of a Political risk.

Heya Fenton. :2wave: Another point from the get go.....when they moved from the Hotel to Consulate. They never adopted adequate security Measures in the first place. Even when Hilliary went to vist she had to order in more Security. But only for her visit. ;)
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

No the Video wasn't the Catalyst or the Trigger.....which BO later talked about listening to the Chatter. Which they had been doing so Since the March Attack on the Same Consulate.

Clearly you have no clue as to what you are talking about. So thats just some more of that Wind you hear when you whiff. Just sayin!

It was the anniversary of 911 as well...
I suppose you think THAT had absolutely nothing to do with it as well?:lamo

BTW that vacuous whooshing sound we keep hearing around here is the malodorous flatulence of Rush being regurgitated and echoed through the keyboards of the right wing desperados as they realize that their next President will wear just slightly more rouge and lipstick than their precious Reagan did.
If this is what you think you are going to defeat Hillary with, ... Proceed Governor ...
You are pissing into the wind.:2wave::lamo
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

It was the anniversary of 911 as well...
I suppose you think THAT had absolutely nothing to do with it as well?:lamo

BTW that vacuous whooshing sound we keep hearing around here is the malodorous flatulence of Rush being regurgitated and echoed through the keyboards of the right wing desperados as they realize that their next President will wear just slightly more rouge and lipstick than their precious Reagan did.
If this is what you think you are going to defeat Hillary with, ... Proceed Governor ...
You are pissing into the wind.:2wave::lamo

Really.....911 was part of it to. Heavens-to-mergatroid, now what ever gave you that thought. :roll:

Brilliant deduction as Sherlock Holmes would say. Now when you figure that part out about BO and him not setting the Nation at the highest Security Risk for that date. Than you actually might have a clue about Benghazi.

As for your deflection over Rush Limbaugh.....Nah no Rush for you.....not even Rush Limbaugh can save you when you start talking about that which.....you don't know about.

Here is a clue for you and your Left leaning Buddies. Its called overseas News Sources. Now you can get back to your regular scheduled program of Playing out Deep in left field.

Oh and after all that Bloviating.....its simple. Either come with the material that shows you have some sort of ground to stand on. Or.....Don't talk about Benghazi. Since you keep whiffing with that Whiffle ball bat. Maybe you can get the Old Clique Crew to help you out a lil.....just to even things up a bit. Even though the outcome will still be the same.
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

Really.....911 was part of it to. Heavens-to-mergatroid, now what ever gave you that thought. :roll:

Brilliant deduction as Sherlock Holmes would say. Now when you figure that part out about BO and him not setting the Nation at the highest Security Risk for that date. Than you actually might have a clue about Benghazi.

As for your deflection over Rush Limbaugh.....Nah no Rush for you.....not even Rush Limbaugh can save you when you start talking about that which.....you don't know about.

Here is a clue for you and your Left leaning Buddies. Its called overseas News Sources. Now you can get back to your regular scheduled program of Playing out Deep in left field.

Oh and after all that Bloviating.....its simple. Either come with the material that shows you have some sort of ground to stand on. Or.....Don't talk about Benghazi. Since you keep whiffing with that Whiffle ball bat. Maybe you can get the Old Clique Crew to help you out a lil.....just to even things up a bit. Even though the outcome will still be the same.
Proceed Governor ....
BTW your face is all wet...
 
Re: Hillary Clinton claims she had doubts about video explanation after Benghazi stri

Proceed Governor ....
BTW your face is all wet...

Well when you can actually stand up on the issue and back what you have, then you can talk.....until then. Don't!
 
Back
Top Bottom