• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Majority Leader Cantor loses GOP primary to tea-party challenger[W:243:247:349]

Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

And the Dems have to own up to a lot. Flowery headin clouds bull**** and no solid leadership or plan gets us this:

View attachment 67167904

The fruit of Obama's ill-conceived Dream act....


Obama owns it.. no more Cantor to blame.. Obama must be crying
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Do you think the Democrats will follow the Republicans example of cleaning house ?
Healthy to see you're coming to grips with your house-cleaning.
Truthfully, the only way to three parties would be for you guys to permanent split, Rand Paul, and try to grow from there--if I were you.
Dems are too scared of both of your right-wing tentacles to d-i-v-o-r-c-e .
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

well.. because what we have in unsustainable... Dems Libs are great until they run out of other people money..

Again, Cantor losing has nothing to do with the Democrats. Because establishment Republicans are getting primaried, that means the Democrats have to do the same thing?

we also see their policies get us killed..

Huh?
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Again, Cantor losing has nothing to do with the Democrats. Because establishment Republicans are getting primaried, that means the Democrats have to do the same thing?



Huh?


Lib policies get us kiiled.. from abortion to stopping stop and frisk.. to not prosecuting the first WTC attack as an act of war.. to Eric Holders existance..to Obamacare.. to depression and suicide by not being able to get a job.. and much much more.. to cap and trade and gving our freedom to the UN on gun laws..


You know.. reality we call it..the living word.. real life..real death..
I dont have days to go on and on..
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Democrats do not need to subject themselves to political purity tests.

Unitedwestand, haven't you been paying attention to California and how many Democrats holding public office have been indicted for corruption, gun running and taking bribes ? So far all convicted and many sitting in the pokey today.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Lib policies get us kiiled.. from abortion to stopping stop and frisk.. to not prosecuting the first WTC attack as an act of war.. to Eric Holders existance..to Obamacare.. to depression and suicide by not being able to get a job.. and much much more


You know.. reality we call it..the living word.. real life..real death..
I dont have days to go on and on..

Wait, stopping stop and frisk is a liberal policy? I read earlier on this very forum that stop and frisk itself was a liberal policy.

You're honestly blaming "depression and suicide by not being able to get a job" on "lib policy"? And you wonder why it's very difficult to take you seriously.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Unitedwestand, haven't you been paying attention to California and how many Democrats holding public office have been indicted for corruption, gun running and taking bribes ? So far all convicted and many sitting in the pokey today.

Because as we know, corruption is solely limited to Democrats. Nope, no Republican has ever been corrupt, no sir.

Your post is totally irrelevant, not only to the thread but to United's post that you were replying to.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

I think what many conservatives cheering this aren't really seeing the big picture.

At worst, the fact that Virginia has open primaries puts serious doubt as to just why he won the election. If Democrats actually fiddled with the voting and sent themselves out in droves to vote for Brat. Republicans are in for a horrible upset when the election actually takes place. In American politics, spending means winning. Cantor spent 5 million and Brat spent about 1/25th of that. How did he win? He had no exposure. He got verbal support from talking heads but even as the race drew nearer, Cantor was still the clear winner. What happened? Foul play from Democrats? It can't be proved, but it's more than likely. What strengthens my bias towards that idea is the fact that at the last minute, Democrats found a candidate to run against "whomever" won. Suspicious to say the least. Cantor actually knew well ahead of time that Democrats may try to change the outcome of the race. Interestingly enough: Cantor himself accused his opponent of enticing Democrats to do just that.
Both parties in Illinois have done this stuff for decades, though we're better at it.
We almost got now sure-winner GOP candidate Rauner in the primary--Union folks crossed over for Dillard--including me.
Dems will fiddle with Mississippi in two weeks also, helping McDaniel beat Sen. Cochran .
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

I think what many conservatives cheering this aren't really seeing the big picture.

At worst, the fact that Virginia has open primaries puts serious doubt as to just why he won the election. If Democrats actually fiddled with the voting and sent themselves out in droves to vote for Brat. Republicans are in for a horrible upset when the election actually takes place. In American politics, spending means winning. Cantor spent 5 million and Brat spent about 1/25th of that. How did he win? He had no exposure. He got verbal support from talking heads but even as the race drew nearer, Cantor was still the clear winner. What happened? Foul play from Democrats? It can't be proved, but it's more than likely. What strengthens my bias towards that idea is the fact that at the last minute, Democrats found a candidate to run against "whomever" won. Suspicious to say the least. Cantor actually knew well ahead of time that Democrats may try to change the outcome of the race. Interestingly enough: Cantor himself accused his opponent of enticing Democrats to do just that.

What's more damaging for Republicans at home is that now Eric Cantor, who may for the most part have been a solid right winger has been replaced by someone who is A) an unknown an B) further to the right. While hardline Republicans may be rejoicing at Brat's win, it'll simply mean that Republicans may now have another uncompromising figure who is not in line with the more center right values of the average American. Will he alienate Independents? Of course he will but he may make up for it by revitalizing some constituents who may have otherwise stayed home.

At best, if this guy won on his own merit (IMHO: plausible, but unlikely) this is a bad sign for Democrats and Republicans alike. It means we might be seeing the start of a shift in politics. Candidates with little exposure, shoe string budgets and zero experience in politics can now win landslide victories by piggybacking the opinions of well known commentators. As implausible as that sounds, it may have just happened and he may be the first in a long line of left wing and right wing candidates who win because of their opinions and not how they vote.

You have a ligitament argument and it's closer to legal voter fraud and we have the same thing now in California. It was the Democrats who have pushed for open primaries. I wonder why ?
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Wait, stopping stop and frisk is a liberal policy? I read earlier on this very forum that stop and frisk itself was a liberal policy.

You're honestly blaming "depression and suicide by not being able to get a job" on "lib policy"? And you wonder why it's very difficult to take you seriously.

that you dont understand and post nonsense is not for me to debate as you obviously do not get even what stop and frisk is and since its been stopped in NYC the murder rate has climbed..

what party just overturned Stop and Frisk?... take a guess
 
Last edited:
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

You have a ligitament argument and it's closer to legal voter fraud and we have the same thing now in California. It was the Democrats who have pushed for open primaries. I wonder why ?

*sigh*

Citation needed.

In 1999, the California Democratic Party filed suit in 1999 to stop the state's primary from going to an open primary, a suit they lost but was overturned by the SCOTUS.

California Democratic Party v. Jones | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Because as we know, corruption is solely limited to Democrats. Nope, no Republican has ever been corrupt, no sir.

Your post is totally irrelevant, not only to the thread but to United's post that you were replying to.

the difference is Libs are rewarded for corruption..,,

your post is totally irrelevent to the subject
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

I guess the party leaders are learning that you can't count on much any more; but it is strange that an almost solid Rep district would vote the way they did! No wonder they weren't paying that much attention to Cantor's race, even though VA is an open primary State, and hindsight has shown maybe they should have been! And remember, the Clintons worked hard to get their boy McCauliffe elected governor in 2013, too. That's one reason I'm glad Ohio is not an open primary State. If you're registered Repub, that's the ballot you get in the primary, and vice versa, and the people at the voting places have those records. Open voting is only allowed in Presidential elections, which I think is fair.

Greetings, Pero. :2wave:

Georgia is and I like it that way. I probably have no business in voting in either the Republican or Democratic Primaries as a Reform Party Member, but what the heck. We don't have party registration, you are just registered to vote, period. But once you vote in the primary, if there is a runoff, you can't switch from Democratic to Republican to vote in the runoff or vice versa. You must vote in the runoff of the party you originally voted in in the primary.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Unitedwestand, haven't you been paying attention to California and how many Democrats holding public office have been indicted for corruption, gun running and taking bribes ? So far all convicted and many sitting in the pokey today.

Do you notice why Indiana and Missouri's senate seats remained in democratic hands in 2012?

In Indiana, the republicans primaried senator Richard Luger, a muti term incumbent, as not conservative enough. The guy who intended to replace Luger, Richard mourdock, proved too far right for the general election and lost the seat to the democrat.

As for Missouri, the republican canidate, Todd akin, was simply too extreme for the voters and rejected him in favor of keeping the democrat.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

Georgia is and I like it that way. I probably have no business in voting in either the Republican or Democratic Primaries as a Reform Party Member, but what the heck. We don't have party registration, you are just registered to vote, period. But once you vote in the primary, if there is a runoff, you can't switch from Democratic to Republican to vote in the runoff or vice versa. You must vote in the runoff of the party you originally voted in in the primary.

Intersting.
 
Re: Eric Cantor is Gone

that you dont understand and post nonsense is not for me to debate as you obviously do not get even what stop and frisk is and since its been stopped in NYC the murder rate has climbed..

I know what stop and frisk is. And I'm saying that in an earlier thread, it was claimed that stop and frisk was a "liberal policy."

NYC's murder rate has NOT climbed. Shootings have, but the murder rate has not.

Even as shootings rise, murder rate falls in New York City

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The number of shootings in New York City has spiked by 13 percent so far this year, though the murder rate is on track to hit a 50-year low, a statistical paradox that experts said reflects quick medical response.

That said, there's little evidence to suggest the correlation between the correlative relationship between more shootings and less stop-and-frisk is a causative one, especially given that a. S&F still exists, and b. the increase in shootings has also been attributed to an increase in gang activity that predates de Blasio.

Stop-and-Frisk Data | New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) - American Civil Liberties Union of New York State
 
Back
Top Bottom