• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office:not random [W:43:128]

Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I'll condemn that just as strongly as you'd condemn left wing motivated vandalism, your response being "well the right has done it too" so I guess that just makes us all even.

The only reason I linked to examples of right-wing vandalism was because it was explicitly stated that vandalism is purely a left-wing tactic.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

The only reason I linked to examples of right-wing vandalism was because it was explicitly stated that vandalism is purely a left-wing tactic.

I agree that that would be a clearly inaccurate statement to make but your response looks like you're justifying left wing vandalism.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I agree that that would be a clearly inaccurate statement to make but your response looks like you're justifying left wing vandalism.

Oh, please. Nobody's justifying vandalism of any kind.

I guess I made the erroneous assumption that went without saying.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Oh, please. Nobody's justifying vandalism of any kind.

Not seeing too many condemn it either. /shrug
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Clearly, the OP proves that all Liberals are horrible people. Just like the guy in the mass shooting proves that all gun owners are bad.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Liberals hate gays, minorities and women that dare to step off the plantation.

And conservatives just love anybody who disagrees with them....:roll:
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Μολὼν λαβέ;1063342533 said:
Its called denial.

Actually, it's just one of those rules of life we're all expected to follow: it's always fair to assume the right did something but it's never fair to assume the left did. ;)
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Actually, it's just one of those rules of life we're all expected to follow: it's always fair to assume the right did something but it's never fair to assume the left did. ;)

What on earth are you talking about.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

And conservatives just love anybody who disagrees with them....:roll:

There's a certain degree of hypocrisy, though, in the intolerance sometimes shown in the treatment by some liberals of women and minorities that don't display "proper" thinking by the same folks who claim a monopoly on compassion and tolerance. And no, hypocrisy is not exclusive to either side by any means. It's why liberals (probably quite fairly) make a point of highlighting a right wing, "family values" spouting conservative caught cheating on his wife or looking for love in a bathroom stall in the men's room.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

What on earth are you talking about.

Predictability, such as the reponses in this thread. The facts make no difference. The Family Research Council's office could have been the one vandalized and the immediate response would not be condemnation but an argument that it was probably a right winger who did it. Lol.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Does anyone wonder if his being gay had anything to do with this vandalism? It seems if it was someone with an axe grind against gays they would have spray painted at least one Fags go to Hell slogan.

It seems both sides of this coin have a hard dealing with gays and blacks. Can't say anything negative or will be considered prejudice and if one complains of being treated unfairly you will be considered using the gay or black card.

I really don't think this had anything to do with his being gay but then again I know diddly squat as most here.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

They clearly demonstrate a direct attack upon the sacredness of the vote of the people - and is that not what you object to?

No, as per the OP I'm against vandalism and violence as a political statement.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Predictability, such as the reponses in this thread. The facts make no difference. The Family Research Council's office could have been the one vandalized and the immediate response would not be condemnation but an argument that it was probably a right winger who did it. Lol.

I would hope it wouldn't be too much to ask that condemnation would go without saying, and that we could discuss things* without having to give the Vandalism Is Bad disclaimer before hand.

* -- I would like to note that there's two posters in this thread who have claimed that vandalism is a left-wing tactic. Why aren't you admonishing them?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I would hope it wouldn't be too much to ask that condemnation would go without saying, and that we could discuss things* without having to give the Vandalism Is Bad disclaimer before hand.

* -- I would like to note that there's two posters in this thread who have claimed that vandalism is a left-wing tactic. Why aren't you admonishing them?

If this were a story regarding someone on the left being targeted, I'm pretty sure you'd be clear in your condemnation. ;)

*are they saying it's an entirely left wing tactic because that would be clearly wrong. On the other hand, did you know that the number one reason for domestic terrorism, including vandalism and arson, is environmentalism? So for some of the left (not the majority of course) vandalism is indeed a tactic. To deny that would be dishonest.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

If this were a story regarding someone on the left being targeted, I'm pretty sure you'd be clear in your condemnation. ;)

*are they saying it's an entirely left wing tactic because that would be clearly wrong. On the other hand, did you know that the number one reason for domestic terrorism, including vandalism and arson, is environmentalism? So for some of the left (not the majority of course) vandalism is indeed a tactic. To deny that would be dishonest.

More specifically, animal rights weirdos, I would assume, unless you're referring to the jackholes who spike trees and ****.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

If this were a story regarding someone on the left being targeted, I'm pretty sure you'd be clear in your condemnation. ;)

*are they saying it's an entirely left wing tactic because that would be clearly wrong. On the other hand, did you know that the number one reason for domestic terrorism, including vandalism and arson, is environmentalism? So for some of the left (not the majority of course) vandalism is indeed a tactic. To deny that would be dishonest.

I think we all know the history of the left and why the Democrats press for a prisoners right to vote. Most Convicts Vote Democrat, Study Shows - PolicyMic
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I think we all know the history of the left

Oh boy, here we go again. Grant and his normal "left" garbage.

and why the Democrats press for a prisoners right to vote.

The reason most ex-cons are Democrats is because most ex-cons are poor and minorities, two demographics the Republicans have made their hay off crapping all over for decades.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I think we all know the history of the left and why the Democrats press for a prisoners right to vote. Most Convicts Vote Democrat, Study Shows - PolicyMic

I haven't seen too many left wingers press for the rights of felons to vote. Honestly, I see more libertarians make that argument (not saying that's good or bad, it just is).
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Liberals hate gays, minorities and women that dare to step off the plantation.

Again with the hogwash.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Oh boy, here we go again. Grant and his normal "left" garbage.



The reason most ex-cons are Democrats is because most ex-cons are poor and minorities, two demographics the Republicans have made their hay off crapping all over for decades.

Actually, we just tend to be much less sympathetic to criminal behavior.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I haven't seen too many left wingers press for the rights of felons to vote. Honestly, I see more libertarians make that argument (not saying that's good or bad, it just is).

Holder is certainly pressing for it.. Eric Holder seeks to change laws allowing ex-convicts to vote - WSJ

We can see also that the Democrats are also against voter ID, which certainly helps them with the Hispanic vote.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Oh boy, here we go again. Grant and his normal "left" garbage.
I didn't do the study. Did you seriously believe it was mostly Republicans in the slammer?
The reason most ex-cons are Democrats is because most ex-cons are poor and minorities, two demographics the Republicans have made their hay off crapping all over for decades.
Exactly. The Dems continue giving them handouts to keep them poor and dependent, while the Republicans want it only for the genuinely needy. There is a very good reason why Obama is called "The Food Stamp President" and they are encouraging more Americans to get on board as well.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I didn't do the study. Did you seriously believe it was mostly Republicans in the slammer?

I was referring more to your usual blanket use of "left" as a pejorative.

Exactly. The Dems continue giving them handouts to keep them poor and dependent, while the Republicans want it only for the genuinely needy.

Voting rights are a "handout"? Also, as stated earlier, giving convicts their voting rights back is generally not a mainstream Democratic Party position, Eric Holder's opinion notwithstanding. But please, continue spewing your usual GOP talking points.

There is a very good reason why Obama is called "The Food Stamp President"

Yes, because conservative spinmeisters have to find some way to pin it on him that the economy went tits up and people had to go on the SNAP program to survive.

and they are encouraging more Americans to get on board as well.

:citation needed:
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I was referring more to your usual blanket use of "left" as a pejorative.
Of course it's a pejorative, and for good reason.

Voting rights are a "handout"?
You ask this question and wonder why 'left' is used as a pejorative.
Also, as stated earlier, giving convicts their voting rights back is generally not a mainstream Democratic Party position, Eric Holder's opinion notwithstanding. But please, continue spewing your usual GOP talking points.
It's the Obama administrations desire as well, lefty, as you would have seen in the link.
Yes, because conservative spinmeisters have to find some way to pin it on him that the economy went tits up and people had to go on the SNAP program to survive.
Obama says the economy is fine. Which one of you is the liar? White House says economy has vastly improved since Obama took over - YouTube

:citation needed:
You didn't even know this???And you feel offended when the the left is accused of ongoing and rampant stupidity? Government runs ads to get more people on food stamps - Jun. 25, 2012
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Of course it's a pejorative, and for good reason.

Only ideologues attempt to use "left" and "right" as insults.

You ask this question and wonder why 'left' is used as a pejorative.

Oh, I know why you use it as a pejorative.

It's the Obama administrations desire as well, lefty, as you would have seen in the link.

Apparently there's also, quoted from the article "some conservative lawmakers in Congress" who are also for it.

Obama says the economy is fine. Which one of you is the liar?

"Vastly improved" from **** is still ****. Of course, since you are hellbent on whitewashing your "side's" role in the economy's collapse, it's little wonder that you're attacking Obama for it.

You didn't even know this???And you feel offended when the the left is accused of ongoing and rampant stupidity?

All I asked for was a citation. You're the one who took it down Personal Attack Boulevard.
 
Back
Top Bottom