• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter

I could be wrong, but I believe the first quarter results for the US were a GDP of 0.1%, not 1% - a significant difference, and basically flat. It was anticipated that the GDP would be in the 1.5% range for the quarter so the results are terrible.

That said, weather was indeed a major factor and drag on consumer activity and the shipment of goods. Canada had similar issues, yet our GDP was significantly better, in the 1.2% range.

I'm curious, although this may not be a factor at all, whether or not the onset of the ACA, the mandate of individual purchase of health insurance coverage and the loss of coverage for many as well as the increased cost in coverage due to mandated minimum coverages for others has had any impact on consumer confidence and/or activity due to a reduction in disposable income.

No, it is an actual contraction of 1 %. Here is the actual document: https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdphighlights.pdf
 
You're right - thanks.

Any thoughts on the "why", related to the ACA coming online?

From the document I linked to:

The decline in real GDP was more than account-
ed for by a significant decline in inventory in-
vestment, notably by motor vehicle dealerships.
In fact, GDP less inventory investment (real final
sales of domestic product) rose 0.6 percent in the
first quarter.
Declines in exports, in business investment, in

state and local government spending, and in
housing investment also contributed to the de-
crease in first-quarter real GDP.
 
and those on the right cheer when the nation's economy appears to have had a hiccup
meanwhile they ignore the consistent growth of the economy under a democratic president
cheering against the economy. betting against the country. today's GOP


"hiccup" ... you're funny.
"consistent growth" ... stop it, you're a scream.

Was this 5 year period a typical recovery?
(wait for it)
 
U.S. GDP Contracted at 1% Pace in First Quarter - WSJ.com

"he U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2014, the latest stumble for a recovery that has struggled to find its footing since the recession ended almost five years ago."

The "recovery" is over.

Whatever the reason, its quite possible we're in the middle of small recession, but wont know for a few months. I bet politicians are very scared right now, given the proximity to the election.
 
BTW, less then half of America receives significant snowfall.

When there are disruptive weather conditions in an area that includes Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, Cleveland, Philadelphia, New York City, and Washington, DC, that can have a large impact on overall economic activity. With the exception of Washington, DC, all of those cities registered top-ten seasonal snowfall figures. Detroit had its snowiest winter on record.

Indeed, if just the three airports in NYC shut down, the impact ripples across all of the nation’s airports. The same impact occurs when shipping is disrupted in one or major ports, etc.

From the February climate report:

The persistent cold during winter resulted in 91 percent of the Great Lakes being frozen by the beginning of March, according to NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory. This was second largest ice cover for the Great Lakes since records began in 1973, and only surpassed by the Great Lakes ice cover in 1979…

According to NOAA data analyzed by the Rutgers Global Snow Lab, the winter average snow cover extent for the contiguous U.S. was 1.42 million square miles, which was 170,000 square miles above the 1981-2010 average. This marked the 10[SUP]th[/SUP] largest seasonal snow cover extent in the 1966-present period of record. Above-average snow cover was observed across the northern and eastern U.S., while below-average snow cover was observed from the Southern Rockies westward.

The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCE)) during winter was above average and the 25[SUP]th[/SUP] highest value on record for the season. Elements that contributed to the above average USCEI included the spatial extent of cold maximum and minimum temperatures and days with precipitation. The USCEI is an index that tracks extremes (falling in the upper or lower ten percent of the record) in temperature, precipitation, and drought across the contiguous United States. The CEI for the West region was record high during winter.


National Overview - February 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

From the March climate report:

Nearly two-thirds of the Great Lakes remained frozen by early April, impacting commercial shipping…

A winter storm from March 12-13 dropped up to 26 inches (66 cm) of snow, 0.25 inches (0.6 cm) of ice, and nearly 2 inches (50.8 mm) of rain on the region. Wind gusts of up to 66 mph (29.5 m/s) caused tree and structural damage and triggered ground delays and stops at major Northeast airports. Buffalo, New York, reported blizzard conditions for the second time this winter. That is the first time the city has had blizzard conditions twice in a winter since recordkeeping began, according to NBC News. From March 25-26, a powerful nor'easter affected the region. The brunt of the storm was felt along coastal regions of Massachusetts and far eastern Maine. While snow totals were generally less than a foot, strong winds created problems. In Massachusetts on the 26th, wind gusts up to 83 mph (37.1 m/s) were reported on Nantucket Island, while gusts to 71 mph (31.7 m/s) were reported along Cape Cod. Blizzard conditions occurred for up to 7 hours in those areas. Coastal flooding, beach erosion, downed tree, and power outages also occurred. A storm at the end of the month brought up to 12 inches (30.5 cm) of snow and nearly 6 inches (152.4 mm) or rain to the region. Flooding occurred as waterways spilled their banks, while flash flooding made roads impassable and left cars stuck in up to 3 feet (0.9 m) of water in some areas. With multiple snowstorms during the month, Washington Dulles, DC had its snowiest March on record. The site accumulated 19.8 inches (50.3 cm) of snow during the month, beating the old record of 15.5 inches (39.4 cm) set in 1993.


National Overview - March 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

When ports are periodically closed and bad weather prevails, one would expect hits in exports (goods cannot be shipped from factories to ports and then out of the country) and reduced construction activity. If one takes a closer look at the GDP data, that’s where some of the biggest drag on economic activity occurred (annualized changes): Nonresidential structures: -7.5%; Residential investment: -5.0% (some housing-related dynamics; some weather-related issues); Exports of goods: -9.8%
 
I could be wrong, but I believe the first quarter results for the US were a GDP of 0.1%, not 1% - a significant difference, and basically flat. It was anticipated that the GDP would be in the 1.5% range for the quarter so the results are terrible.

The 0.1% figure was the first estimate. Today's -1.0% change is the revised figure.
 
Stock are a terrible measure of the health of the economy.
GDP isn't so hot either. ;)

I do agree that stocks aren't a good measure of the economy. However, it is very clear that the market has completely shrugged off this news, because they fully understand that it is not an indicator that we're headed for another recession, and that many other indicators are looking up.


I always have to shake my head at the cycle in Economic reporting....
Erm, okay.... You do realize that claiming "the recovery is over" because GDP fell 1% in Q1 is, basically, an extremely primitive form of economic reporting?

Now, I will agree that there are often issues with economic reporting, especially in the middle of a bubble. That doesn't affect the validity of the claims in reference to consumer confidence, home sales rates, inventory rates and so forth.


We haven't fixed anything that was wrong with the 2007 economy.
If you mean that Congress failed to institute sufficient regulation and to reinstate the separation between commercial banks and speculators, or that it has failed to regulate obscure financial products like derivatives and CDS's and CDO's, or that it hasn't forced banks to hold enough reserves, I'd agree. That also doesn't change the fact that the economy does seem to be on a gradual upward path, rather than heading for another recession.

There are also many challenges that are very hard to fix. For example, the population is aging, which is going to put a strain on the economy. The only viable bandage is to allow more (and younger) immigrants, who can in turn work in the US, buy stuff in the US and thus increase tax revenues and economic activity. Some politicians on both sides of the aisle are waking up to this, but I'm not currently optimistic that immigration will be tackled any time soon.

In fact, the only improvement over 2007 is that companies are now stockpiling more cash....
Actually, it is not great that companies are hoarding cash, because that means employees are getting their wages squeezed, and that capital is not being reinvested into the economy. While it is eminently rational for individual corporations to pursue those courses of actions, it is actually very bad for the economy as a whole, since that capital is locked up and not actually doing anything.

Similarly, many companies do everything they can to reduce their tax burdens. Good for the individual companies, bad for the country as a whole.


this administration is hell bent on taking that stockpile under the pretense of economic equality.
Unless they aren't.

The only thing the Obama administration has done is slightly increase the top marginal tax rate and some capital gains taxes, which has no effect whatsoever on corporate cash holdings. There are no plans to tax corporate cash holdings or similar assets.
 
When there are disruptive weather conditions in an area that includes Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, Cleveland, Philadelphia, New York City, and Washington, DC, that can have a large impact on overall economic activity. With the exception of Washington, DC, all of those cities registered top-ten seasonal snowfall figures. Detroit had its snowiest winter on record.

Indeed, if just the three airports in NYC shut down, the impact ripples across all of the nation’s airports. The same impact occurs when shipping is disrupted in one or major ports, etc.

From the February climate report:

The persistent cold during winter resulted in 91 percent of the Great Lakes being frozen by the beginning of March, according to NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory. This was second largest ice cover for the Great Lakes since records began in 1973, and only surpassed by the Great Lakes ice cover in 1979…

According to NOAA data analyzed by the Rutgers Global Snow Lab, the winter average snow cover extent for the contiguous U.S. was 1.42 million square miles, which was 170,000 square miles above the 1981-2010 average. This marked the 10[SUP]th[/SUP] largest seasonal snow cover extent in the 1966-present period of record. Above-average snow cover was observed across the northern and eastern U.S., while below-average snow cover was observed from the Southern Rockies westward.

The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCE)) during winter was above average and the 25[SUP]th[/SUP] highest value on record for the season. Elements that contributed to the above average USCEI included the spatial extent of cold maximum and minimum temperatures and days with precipitation. The USCEI is an index that tracks extremes (falling in the upper or lower ten percent of the record) in temperature, precipitation, and drought across the contiguous United States. The CEI for the West region was record high during winter.


National Overview - February 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

From the March climate report:

Nearly two-thirds of the Great Lakes remained frozen by early April, impacting commercial shipping…

A winter storm from March 12-13 dropped up to 26 inches (66 cm) of snow, 0.25 inches (0.6 cm) of ice, and nearly 2 inches (50.8 mm) of rain on the region. Wind gusts of up to 66 mph (29.5 m/s) caused tree and structural damage and triggered ground delays and stops at major Northeast airports. Buffalo, New York, reported blizzard conditions for the second time this winter. That is the first time the city has had blizzard conditions twice in a winter since recordkeeping began, according to NBC News. From March 25-26, a powerful nor'easter affected the region. The brunt of the storm was felt along coastal regions of Massachusetts and far eastern Maine. While snow totals were generally less than a foot, strong winds created problems. In Massachusetts on the 26th, wind gusts up to 83 mph (37.1 m/s) were reported on Nantucket Island, while gusts to 71 mph (31.7 m/s) were reported along Cape Cod. Blizzard conditions occurred for up to 7 hours in those areas. Coastal flooding, beach erosion, downed tree, and power outages also occurred. A storm at the end of the month brought up to 12 inches (30.5 cm) of snow and nearly 6 inches (152.4 mm) or rain to the region. Flooding occurred as waterways spilled their banks, while flash flooding made roads impassable and left cars stuck in up to 3 feet (0.9 m) of water in some areas. With multiple snowstorms during the month, Washington Dulles, DC had its snowiest March on record. The site accumulated 19.8 inches (50.3 cm) of snow during the month, beating the old record of 15.5 inches (39.4 cm) set in 1993.


National Overview - March 2014 | State of the Climate | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

When ports are periodically closed and bad weather prevails, one would expect hits in exports (goods cannot be shipped from factories to ports and then out of the country) and reduced construction activity. If one takes a closer look at the GDP data, that’s where some of the biggest drag on economic activity occurred (annualized changes): Nonresidential structures: -7.5%; Residential investment: -5.0% (some housing-related dynamics; some weather-related issues); Exports of goods: -9.8%

Weather is a desperate cop out and I'm not buying it


But lets just say its a legitimate excuse.

After 6 years our economy, the largest economy in the world is so weak that "bad weather" causes the GDP to shrink.

Uh huh.
 
Weather is a desperate cop out and I'm not buying it


But lets just say its a legitimate excuse.

After 6 years our economy, the largest economy in the world is so weak that "bad weather" causes the GDP to shrink.

Uh huh.

Weather is one factor and it was an important one as the worst of the weather-related impacts occurred during a two-month period that fell in the 1st quarter. That most of the economic data since Q1 has shown a pickup suggests that the factors were likely temporary. The first estimate of Q2 GDP (July 30) will confirm whether or not the dip was temporary. Most economists believe that it was. Furthermore, if there was pent-up demand related to temporary factors one should see annual real GDP growth in the 3%-4% range with some upside potential.

In any case, we'll know soon enough.
 
So what in the economy is growing? Show me. Everything I read says people are giving up looking for work in droves. CEO pay has never been higher, yet we are at a stagnant unemployment rate with millions no longer looking for work. How do you spin this as growth?

I'm not blaming Obama for the problem, as this all started years ago. but he isn't helping it any. We never seem to be proactive, but reactive. That is a huge problem because by the time we finally react, most of the damage is done.
[emphasis added by bubba]
graph economic recovery under Obama.jpg
graph employment change under Obama.jpg
grapgh chnage in employment by industry under Obama.jpg
the only shrinkage is in number of government jobs and rate of growth of the federal budget
areas where the GOP says one thing and does quite another
 
[emphasis added by bubba]
View attachment 67167232
View attachment 67167233
View attachment 67167234
the only shrinkage is in number of government jobs and rate of growth of the federal budget
areas where the GOP says one thing and does quite another

Doesn't seem like the American public agrees with you

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

Further what you and other liberals always fail to recognize is that when you have a budget as large as Obama's the percentage change is always going to be lower but the amount always much higher. Tell me how the 3.9 trillion dollar Obama budget shows someone interested in lowering the deficit and debt? Seems that the definition of transforming America was interpreted differently by the American people vs Obama's. We are getting exactly what Obama wanted, a European socialist economy with low economic growth, high unemployment, high debt, and an economy dependent on the Federal Govt. thus more people dependent on that govt.
 
Doesn't seem like the American public agrees with you

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

Further what you and other liberals always fail to recognize is that when you have a budget as large as Obama's the percentage change is always going to be lower but the amount always much higher. Tell me how the 3.9 trillion dollar Obama budget shows someone interested in lowering the deficit and debt? Seems that the definition of transforming America was interpreted differently by the American people vs Obama's. We are getting exactly what Obama wanted, a European socialist economy with low economic growth, high unemployment, high debt, and an economy dependent on the Federal Govt. thus more people dependent on that govt.

Polls are BS. 60 million people voted for him just a couple years ago.
 
Polls are BS. 60 million people voted for him just a couple years ago.

That was four million less than in 2008 and the more people see of him the more they realize the mistake they made. Why would anyone support the transformation of this economy into a European socialist one?
 
I'm just begging for some more shovel-ready jobs.
 
I'm just begging for some more shovel-ready jobs.

Ooh ME TOO !!

I remember when Obama was pushing that lie.

I had this mental image of laid off professional middle aged Americans on some Highway Construction crew, or doing steal work on some decrepit bridge somewhere.

Lol ! I knew then it was BS, but so many people bought that.
 
Ooh ME TOO !!

I remember when Obama was pushing that lie.

I had this mental image of laid off professional middle aged Americans on some Highway Construction crew, or doing steal work on some decrepit bridge somewhere.

Lol ! I knew then it was BS, but so many people bought that.

I think what he forgot to do was create jobs to make those shovels.
 
I think what he forgot to do was create jobs to make those shovels.

Brilliant !

Man if you had mentioned that back in 2008 at some Obama White House function, you know as a joke, they would of have introduced you to Christina Romer and offered you a job.

Under Secretary of Job Creation or Shovel Czar !
 
You do realize that GDP numbers come from a government agency too?

Exactly:

U.S. GDP Grew A Glacial 0.1% In The First Quarter 2014




Update May 29, 2014: U.S. GDP Dropped 1% In The First Quarter 2014, Down From First Estimate

Source: Forbes

That people buy this crap is what really makes for a laugh. Absent the Obamacare surge in healthcare spending this would have been a 2% contraction. It may still be revised lower as is wont to happen.

[emphasis added by bubba]
View attachment 67167232
View attachment 67167233
View attachment 67167234
the only shrinkage is in number of government jobs and rate of growth of the federal budget
areas where the GOP says one thing and does quite another

Whether you can call this job growth is an open question. The raw numbers are higher, but the working-age population has also grown. At the same time labor participation is at multi-decade lows. Even then, many of the jobs being "created" are lower income jobs or part-time jobs. Never mind that any "growth" in the economy is fueled entirely by various Fed and government injections that are unsustainable and distort the market. Stocks jumping higher on such horrible news is a pretty good indicator of how rigged the market has become. All meaningful indicators point to a recession starting this year and, unlike Clinton, Obama will not be able to bail out the system and paper over the losses so that it gets pushed into the next guy's term. The U.S. is still in bailout economy conditions and it would take the kind of money injection that usually precedes hyperinflationary sovereign default crises to prevent another serious downturn.
 
Exactly:



Source: Forbes

That people buy this crap is what really makes for a laugh. Absent the Obamacare surge in healthcare spending this would have been a 2% contraction. It may still be revised lower as is wont to happen.



Whether you can call this job growth is an open question. The raw numbers are higher, but the working-age population has also grown. At the same time labor participation is at multi-decade lows. Even then, many of the jobs being "created" are lower income jobs or part-time jobs. Never mind that any "growth" in the economy is fueled entirely by various Fed and government injections that are unsustainable and distort the market. Stocks jumping higher on such horrible news is a pretty good indicator of how rigged the market has become. All meaningful indicators point to a recession starting this year and, unlike Clinton, Obama will not be able to bail out the system and paper over the losses so that it gets pushed into the next guy's term. The U.S. is still in bailout economy conditions and it would take the kind of money injection that usually precedes hyperinflationary sovereign default crises to prevent another serious downturn.

So Stimulus ? No, we've had enough of that.

Nothing going to prevent the downturn because we have a ideologue who's loyal to his Progressive roots rather than a objective leader who's willing to consider alternate solutions to growing our economy.

The Political implications are more important than how to help Americans who are struggling with chronic joblessness and dependency.
 
Back
Top Bottom