Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38:145]

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

... Give it a try for a few years. Listen to Limbaugh and Levin, read sources that you find unpalatable at the moment. After a few years you'll be a more rounded individual... and... You might surprise yourself.

Click to expand...

I listened to right-wing radio for years. I told myself I had to get both sides of the issue. Eventually, I just couldn't take the distortion and hypocrisy. There's nothing but right-wing propaganda on right-wing radio. Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck aren't in the business of discussing issues. They're in the business selling low-effort thinkers what they want to hear.

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Joe Steel said:

I listened to right-wing radio for years. I told myself I had to get both sides of the issue. Eventually, I just couldn't take the distortion and hypocrisy. There's nothing but right-wing propaganda on right-wing radio. Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck aren't in the business of discussing issues. They're in the business selling low-effort thinkers what they want to hear.

Click to expand...

Can't argue with you about Beck, Hannity or Ingraham. But then based upon your previously stated inability to access the article in question as well as your hallucination this is a World Net Daily story? Looks like you could give those three a real run for their misinformation money!:shock:

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Filthy McNasty said:

The linked article is neither for subscribers only nor is it from WND. Good try though, dumb as hell, but good try. And we all know about the Times of London, pushing the "WND" angle since 1787.:lamo
[video]http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4091344.ece[/video]

One thing about some of the posters in this thread that is breathtaking? The level of stupidity and self imposed ignorance some here are really really proud of themselves for. Bloody morons.


EDIT: By the way you two geniuses of towering intellect. Just checked WND, as of 9:00 AM 5/16/14 WND is not even covering this story. Maybe later in the day one of you two geniuses can check back and see if they have added the story? Then you can alert the other deep thinker to the fact, so he can ape your banal stupidity?:failpail:

Click to expand...

Your link takes me to a page that requires a subscription. Very impressive fail!

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Redress said:

The problem with WND is not that people disagree with it, it is that they make **** up. Sorry Komrade, birther sources are not what you would kall reliable,.

Click to expand...

You mean they actually were propagandists for Saddam Hussein? Oh... no, that was CNN.
You mean they tried to swing an election in its dying days using forged documents? Whoops, sorry... that was CBS and the NYT.
You mean they quote people out of context to accuse them of being racists? Geez... that was the NYT too.
You mean they wrote Algore's pack of ecolies for him? Nope... seems not to be so.

I think you too are a prime candidate for a Swiss Army Knife with patented mind opener.

Read the article, then complain. You know... struggle to get the truth, even if it might pain you so to do so.

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

You mean they actually were propagandists for Saddam Hussein? Oh... no, that was CNN.
You mean they tried to swing an election in its dying days using forged documents? Whoops, sorry... that was CBS and the NYT.
You mean they quote people out of context to accuse them of being racists? Geez... that was the NYT too.
You mean they wrote Algore's pack of ecolies for him? Nope... seems not to be so.

I think you too are a prime candidate for a Swiss Army Knife with patented mind opener.

Read the article, then complain. You know... struggle to get the truth, even if it might pain you so to do so.

Click to expand...

Basic logic for you: even if all that where true, it would not make WND reliable. WND would still be the birther site.

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Joe Steel said:

I listened to right-wing radio for years. I told myself I had to get both sides of the issue. Eventually, I just couldn't take the distortion and hypocrisy. There's nothing but right-wing propaganda on right-wing radio. Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck aren't in the business of discussing issues. They're in the business selling low-effort thinkers what they want to hear.

Click to expand...

Liberals are notorious liars, and frankly, I don't believe you.

I cite your intellectual laziness to go beyond the 1st post, and the lack of motivation to check for additional sources on google, and your quick dismissal of WND.. just because you do not like the source.

You see, you've proven yourself to be lazy, and narrow minded. "Very Liberal" is a very accurate fit. That I believe.

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Redress said:

Basic logic for you: even if all that where true, it would not make WND reliable. WND would still be the birther site.

Click to expand...

Even if it were all true? It is all true, and these were no small happenings. But, knowing you as I do, I realize this is to be expected.

Added to the journalistic feces I mentioned before, you have the cabal known as journ-O-lists. Hey, I read them, as any open minded citizen who wants to be truly informed would do. But... you have shown all here that you and Joe Steel share a common trait. Your minds are beyond narrow.

But, hey... that is your problem... well, society pays for it too as the 2008 and 2012 elections have illustrated. There's a whole gaggle of ignoramuses out there.

I will compliment you though, as once again, you decend into a thread and offer NOTHING to add to the OP, or the subject at hand.
Congratulations!

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Why is this not surprising?

These Religion of Enviromaniacism's gatekeepers and so many of their ardent followers remaind me of the jackals in The Omen. Rabid in their defense of their faith and savior.

Click to expand...

Was unable to read the link. Could you please supply a link to the article that works?

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

danarhea said:

Was unable to read the link. Could you please supply a link to the article that works?

Click to expand...

Here are a few related stories.

[h=1]Climate change scientist claims he has been forced from new job in 'McCarthy'-style witch-hunt by academics across the world[/h]

• Professor Lennart Bengtsson received intense pressure 'all over the world'
  
• Stepped down from Global Warming Policy Foundation's advisory council
• Swedish academic had only been in the position for three weeks
  
• Think-tank was set up by former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson
• Group has been accused of being sceptic towards climate-change policies

A climate change researcher has claimed that scientists are confusing their role as impartial observers with green activism after his paper challenging predictions about the speed of global warming was rejected because it was seen as “less than helpful.”

Professor Lennart Bengtsson says recent McCarthy-style pressure from fellow academics forced him to resign from his post on a climate sceptic think-tank.

Climate change scientist claims he has been forced from new job in 'McCarthy'-style witch-hunt by academics across the world | Mail Online

Click to expand...

[h=1]Global warming research suppressed due to intolerance of scepticism, claims scientist[/h][h=2]A professor claims his paper questioning the speed of climate change was deliberately rejected for publication due to intolerance of views seen as "sceptical"[/h]
Scientists accused of suppressing research because of climate sceptic argument - Telegraph

Click to expand...

[h=1]NEW GLOBAL-WARMING SKEPTIC FEARS FOR 'SAFETY'[/h][h=2]'Enormous group pressure has become virtually unbearable to me'[/h]A leading climate scientist who has become skeptical of the impact of mankind on climate claims he fears for his safety amid a “witch hunt” by American global warming activists.
Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading in England, said the attacks from the international “climate science community” came after he joined the academic advisory council of a group that questions the theory of man-caused global warming, the Global Warming Policy Foundation.



“I have been put under such an enormous group pressure from all over the world that [it] has become virtually unbearable. It is a situation that reminds me [of] the time of McCarthy,” he wrote in his resignation letter.

Read more at New global-warming skeptic fears for ‘safety’

Click to expand...

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

"Very Liberal" indeed. Intellectual curiosity has never been a strong point of the Socialists.

You did note there was a second post below the OP. Non? It goes into a little more detail. Golly Geez, there is a link to the story too!!! One that fills in even more of the story. How bout them apples?

Looking forward to your deep insights about the Global Warming Faktion, their thug-like tactics, and attempts to deny science from being published.

Click to expand...

But is this surprising? I frequently post articles from Huffpo or Daily Kos or WaPo or the NY Times and other mostly left leaning publications when I think they have made a valid point or offered substantial food for thought. And even though I know all to be left leaning and biased in favor of leftist ideology, I don't dismiss what they have to offer without at least first reading and considering it.

But look at the blanket condemnation of anybody who is on the right side of the ideological spectrum. Conservatives are unwelcome to speak on most college campuses. Some of our members here accuse conservative talk radio of being nothing but conservative 'propaganda'. Some, even those from other countries, seems very well versed in the assigned talking points to condemn anybody with conservative/classical liberal/libertarian (small "L") values and accuse all the 'right' people that are not to be condoned in the liberal world they are trying to create. Those who don't embrace the liberal bandwagon are made unwelcome and uncomfortable in entertainment, in most of the media, in academia, and in the scientific community. Many are marginalized and, as one member posted, some are physically threatened.

There is no encouragement to get a complete education in anything any more; critical thinking is not allowed; and a free exchange of ideas, concepts, and theories is strongly discouraged in the brave new world of progressivism and political correctness.

So does it surprise anybody that a 'liberalized' scientific community would disallow or cover up inconvenient information that doesn't fit the concepts they promote?

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Liberals are notorious liars, and frankly, I don't believe you.

I cite your intellectual laziness to go beyond the 1st post, and the lack of motivation to check for additional sources on google, and your quick dismissal of WND.. just because you do not like the source.

You see, you've proven yourself to be lazy, and narrow minded. "Very Liberal" is a very accurate fit. That I believe.

Click to expand...

All on the basis of a few postings in an internet discussion forum? Without any further research on your part?

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Liberals are notorious liars, and frankly, I don't believe you.

I cite your intellectual laziness to go beyond the 1st post, and the lack of motivation to check for additional sources on google, and your quick dismissal of WND.. just because you do not like the source.

You see, you've proven yourself to be lazy, and narrow minded. "Very Liberal" is a very accurate fit. That I believe.

Click to expand...

Actually, any intelligent person would dismiss WND right off the bat because they're about as accurate as Weekly World News was. The fact that you think it's accurate isn't surprising.

re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Moderator's Warning:

Cut out the nonsense. Stick to the OP, and save the attacks for downstairs.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Redress said:

Your link takes me to a page that requires a subscription. Very impressive fail!

Click to expand...

I have no subscription, yet when I click on this link:Scientists in cover-up of I am magically taken to the story. Here let me help you some more, here is a screencap of the page you and others just can't get your browsers to open. You might notice that in the top right hand corner there is a "login" option which someone with a subscription could, I suppose, click on and use. Of course you don't need to. But then you did think this was also a WND story. You spent so much time babbling about them you keep failing to address, much less operate your internet browser proficiently enough to look at, the actual story. Just checked and this is one of the "hottest trending" links on the interwebz today. Seems the rest of the world is not having "browser issues" today. Just some DP members. Imagine that.:screwy
View attachment 67166617

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Joe Steel said:

All on the basis of a few postings in an internet discussion forum? Without any further research on your part?

Click to expand...

Yep. That is all it took. Your OP and your mindless drone-like condemnation of WND without even reading the article.

Libs are notorious liars, and with your previous posts it is difficult to believe you had a mond open enough to have listened to talk radio beyond a 2 second clip while channel surfing.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Joe Steel said:

All on the basis of a few postings in an internet discussion forum? Without any further research on your part?

Click to expand...

Yep. That is all it took. Your OP and your mindless drone-like condemnation of WND without even reading the article.

Libs are notorious liars, and with your previous posts it is difficult to believe you had a mind open enough to have listened to talk radio beyond a 2 second clip while channel surfing.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

rocket88 said:

Actually, any intelligent person would dismiss WND right off the bat because they're about as accurate as Weekly World News was. The fact that you think it's accurate isn't surprising.

Click to expand...

No intelligent person "would dismiss WND right off the bat". A narrow minded person would.


Below is a link to the WND story. Point out where they are factually wrong. A rocket of your intelligence, it should be no problem. Have at it... shoot it down... if you can.


If there is nothing you can find wrong... I expect you to be a big rocket, and say so. If you fail to reply I will assume you could find nothing and slinked away like a skunk in the dark of night.




New global-warming skeptic fears for ‘safety’

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Below is a link to the WND story. Point out where they are factually wrong. A rocket of your intelligence, it should be no problem. Have at it... shoot it down... if you can.

If there is nothing you can find wrong... I expect you to be a big rocket, and say so. If you fail to reply I will assume you could find nothing and slinked away like a skunk in the dark of night.


New global-warming skeptic fears for ‘safety’

Click to expand...

Prove this is innacurate.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Below is a link to the WND story. Point out where they are factually wrong. A rocket of your intelligence, it should be no problem. Have at it... shoot it down... if you can.

If there is nothing you can find wrong... I expect you to be a big rocket, and say so. If you fail to reply I will assume you could find nothing and slinked away like a skunk in the dark of night.


New global-warming skeptic fears for ‘safety’

Click to expand...

Fear is an emotion. You can't disprove an emotion. There are no facts put forth as to why he would feel that way, therefore it is his emotion and not provable nor disprovable.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

Yep. That is all it took. Your OP and your mindless drone-like condemnation of WND without even reading the article.

Libs are notorious liars, and with your previous posts it is difficult to believe you had a mind open enough to have listened to talk radio beyond a 2 second clip while channel surfing.

Click to expand...

Earlier in this thread I asked if you thought yourself a capable debater. I haven't seen an answer yet but don't bother. I've seen enough.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

Joe Steel said:

Earlier in this thread I asked if you thought yourself a capable debater. I haven't seen an answer yet but don't bother. I've seen enough.

Click to expand...

ROTFLOL... There was no need to answer, as I had taken down you shorts in front of the class and giving you a cyber spanking for all to see.

Have you read the WND article yet?

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

rocket88 said:

Prove this is innacurate.

Click to expand...

rocket88 said:

Fear is an emotion. You can't disprove an emotion. There are no facts put forth as to why he would feel that way, therefore it is his emotion and not provable nor disprovable.

Click to expand...

These posts are proof of what I've claimed about Libs. The beauty of free speech.

Thanks for posting.

PS. I am waiting for your list of errors in this WND story: http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/new-global-warming-skeptic-fears-for-safety/

Or are you going to try to slither away?

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

These posts are proof of what I've claimed about Libs. The beauty of free speech.

Thanks for posting.

PS. I am waiting for your list of errors in this WND story: New global-warming skeptic fears for ‘safety’

Or are you going to try to slither away?

Click to expand...

As I said, fear is an emotion which cannot be proved or disproved. Al Gore has nothing to do with this guy's feelings.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

rocket88 said:

As I said, fear is an emotion which cannot be proved or disproved. Al Gore has nothing to do with this guy's feelings.

Click to expand...

That was based on what the Swedish scientist claimed. It wasn't an invention by WND.

So... you are admitting the article from WND is not flawed? For I see no examples of their being wrong on the facts.

What's funny about this is the intellectual bankruptcy you illustrate, for the Left bases its policies on emotion and feeling... if it was based on results... we would have a hugely leaner government.

Re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

zimmer said:

That was based on what the Swedish scientist claimed. It wasn't an invention by WND.

So... you are admitting the article from WND is not flawed? For I see no examples of their being wrong on the facts.

What's funny about this is the intellectual bankruptcy you illustrate, for the Left bases its policies on emotion and feeling... if it was based on results... we would have a hugely leaner government.

Click to expand...

Which one of us is taking an emotion and equating it with fact?