• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40, 145]

Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

DA60 said:
I think Karl Rove is a prick...a smart prick...but still a prick.

However, what he said has some merit.

I believe everyone that runs for the Presidency should have an extensive physical examination by an unbiased physician beforehand AND make any concerns public.
Especially senior citizens who have had life-threatening brain injuries...like Hilary Clinton (apparently).

That just seems like common sense to me.
Click to expand...
If what you say would be actual, I believe Ronald Reagan would have never made his second term as President, seeing that even the press was seeing signs of Alzheimer's disease.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Muhammed said:
WTF does the failed Secretary of State's head injury have to do with a birth certificate?

Are you suggesting that there was an illegal alien growing in her head and it was not an injury?

WTF dude?
Click to expand...
I'm sorry that you were unable to see the analogy to your statement about Clinton's medical records being made public and the Conservatives wishing to see Obama's birth certificate.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Jack Hays said:
They give more, much more, to charity.:peace
Click to expand...
How do you know this for sure?
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Bob N said:
If what you say would be actual, I believe Ronald Reagan would have never made his second term as President, seeing that even the press was seeing signs of Alzheimer's disease.
Click to expand...

You might be right.

I also think that every POTUS should go through a thorough physical from an unbiased doctor every year of their presidency and that the results (if there are any concerns) are provided to the public.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Bob N said:
I'm sorry that you were unable to see the analogy to your statement about Clinton's medical records being made public and the Conservatives wishing to see Obama's birth certificate.
Click to expand...
of course that couldn't have anything to do with it being a ridiculous attempt at making an analogy. :roll:
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

bubbabgone said:
Ah ... but Conservatives help with their own money.
Click to expand...

Conservatives are usually the ones accepting the charity and then complaining when other people get it, too.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Moot said:
Conservatives are usually the ones accepting the charity and then complaining when other people get it, too.
Click to expand...

Baseless falsehood.:peace
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Bob N said:
I'm sorry that you were unable to see the analogy to your statement about Clinton's medical records being made public and the Conservatives wishing to see Obama's birth certificate.
Click to expand...


2 things picked at random like you did shouldn't be expected to lend themselves to being properly analogized but if we look at it positively, your analogy can be analogized to many other bad analogies.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Moot said:
Conservatives are usually the ones accepting the charity and then complaining when other people get it, too.
Click to expand...


Where the hell did you get that?
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

bubbabgone said:
Where the hell did you get that?
Click to expand...


From conservatives on welfare, foodstamps, unemployment, social security, medicare and Medicaid, mostly.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Jack Hays said:
Hmmm. Why do you suppose it is that conservatives give so much more to charity than liberals?

[h=3]The Giving Gap - Reason.com[/h]

reason.com/archives/2006/12/19/the-giving-gapReason


by Katherine Mangu-Ward - in 1,187 Google+ circles
Dec 19, 2006 - So says Arthur C. Brooks in his new book Who Really Cares?: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism. Brooks, a public ...​
Click to expand...

Jack Hays said:
Please see #296.:peace
Click to expand...
Seriously, Jack? The Reason Foundation?

About Reason Foundation

Reason Foundation advances a free society by developing, applying, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law.

Reason Foundation produces respected public policy research on a variety of issues and publishes the critically-acclaimed Reason magazine. Together, our top-tier think tank and political and cultural magazine reach a diverse, influential audience, advancing the values of choice, individual freedom and limited government.
- See more at: Reason Foundation - About the Reason Foundation
Click to expand...

Yeah. I'm sure that a Libertarian magazine won't be biased toward President Obama, huh. :roll:

Lets try one from another less-biased source shall we? Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

AJiveMan said:
I agree. I really get into the black and white episodes, shown on MeToo every weekend, back when it was called Marshal Dillon.
WCIU, The U / Schedule / WMEU

On Me-TV every night @ 7 p.m., Gunsmoke.

I'm out of touch with the news. :lol:
Click to expand...

"I'm out of touch with the news." Do you ever have those moments when you suspect that you are probably happier that way? I do! :mrgreen:

Greetings, AJiveMan. :2wave:
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Moot said:
From conservatives on welfare, foodstamps, unemployment, social security, medicare and Medicaid, mostly.
Click to expand...


2 things come to mind ... and they should have been obvious to you:

1) those groups you mentioned are what keeps the Democrat Party afloat.
2) that's what I meant by Conservatives help the poor with their own money, Liberals use everyone else's.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

bubbabgone said:
2 things picked at random like you did shouldn't be expected to lend themselves to being properly analogized but if we look at it positively, your analogy can be analogized to many other bad analogies.
Click to expand...
In the light of what is being discussed (Making Hillary show her medical records and a another person--Obama--show his birth certificate.) I most definitely disagree. :2no4:
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Bob N said:
Seriously, Jack? The Reason Foundation?



Yeah. I'm sure that a Libertarian magazine won't be biased toward President Obama, huh. :roll:

Lets try one from another less-biased source shall we? Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities
Click to expand...

Here you go. It's not even close. Conservatives give more.

Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism: Arthur C. Brooks, James Q. Wilson: 9780465008230: Amazon.com: Books
 
Kobie said:
You know how someone becomes qualified to be a Senator? Winning a Senate election. Which she did.

In the conservative mind, there's no such thing as a qualified Democrat.
Click to expand...

So, you are admitting that getting elected was Hillary's one and only qualification. And ofcourse I believe there are and have been some qualified democrats. I though Zell Miller was an excellent Senator.....and John F Kennedy was a decent president. But they did have more going for them then I am the wifey of Slick Willy".
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

Moot said:
Would the email have prevented the attacks at Benghazi? If not, then what difference does it make?
Click to expand...

The difference is that the POTUS and his lemmings in the White House lied to us for two weeks.
 
Re: Karl Rove: Hillary may have brain damage [W:40]

ToastyOats said:
No it doesn't. Rove pushing the idea that she might have a brain injury, without any evidence, in spite of Clinton's doctors already debunking this BS, doesn't make it appear that Hillary has a secret. He's pulling the same childish political nonsense that he and the Bush team did back in 2000 when they released that push poll in SC, weaseling in the idea that John McCain had fathered an illegitmate black child.

Now the media will play with it, and low-info voters might eat it up, and that was the point. That's why Rove was out there, pushing this BS. Elections.
Click to expand...


Gasp! No evidence, what was he thinking? As I said, it's politics -
And the mission was accomplished because you're correct the low information voters will gladly suck it up.

You might remember when "Reid said Romney paid no taxes for 10 years. It was no slip of the tongue. He repeated the claim on at least two more occasions, at one point saying that "the word is out" when in fact it was only Reid who put that "word" out.

Reid has produced no evidence to back up his claim other than attribution to a shadowy anonymous source".
Harry Reid says anonymous source told him Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years | PolitiFact

I hope you were complaining back then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom