• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI investigating Bundy supporters in BLM dispute[W:338]

So let me try and wrap my head around this new bit of CON 'logic'... unless someone does injury to you personally you don't care... bank robbers are cool as long as they don't rob from your account. Murder ok if the victim isn't of your family? So illegal immigrants are cool by you as well???

Doesn't seem intellectually honest... :peace

Bank robbers get arrested as soon as they are identified. How come Bundy hasn't been arrested yet?

Not paying fees isn't the same thing as bank robbery and murder, but hey, whatever gets you through the day.

Let me know when you've had him arrested.
 
So, here it comes....Round 2.

And in true authoritarian style, a full propaganda effort will accompany the suppression of any possible uprising to ensure that the sheep soaking up the reports will know who "the bad guy" is supposed to be....

Remember Orwell.....​OBEY!
Yeah, because pointing guns at law enforcement is our god given right as 'Merickans.
 
So have him arrested.

I do believe that is coming.... the feds have been playing nice, but there will come a tipping point...

But you do the CON dodge- I asked you if other crimes are ok by you if they don't affect you directly.... yes or no... don't dodge...
 
Same one pic of the same guy from different angles....So you still haven't produced anything other than this one stooge...Probably a lib poser just like you.

I note the insult, and understand it for what it is. I do not see how believing people should refrain from threatening gun violence on federal officers would be an indicator of a liberal stance. Unless for some odd reason conservatism now entails the acceptance of domestic terrorism.
 
I do believe that is coming.... the feds have been playing nice, but there will come a tipping point...

But you do the CON dodge- I asked you if other crimes are ok by you if they don't affect you directly.... yes or no... don't dodge...

He didn't steal anything from me. And since he hasn't been charged with a crime, it looks like the US government doesn't believe he stole from them, either.

Let me know when he's been arrested.
 
No doubt...But surely you can see the broader picture of what I am talking about...If someone broke the law in this incident then by all means charge them, and take it to court, but what I am talking about it whether or not this guy is even part of it.

I find it funny that although there were supposedly lots of people with guns at that standoff, the only pic was of this guy from several angles. Then as soon as the ONE pic is displayed, all the usual people come in talking that 'militia this, militia that' BS, and we don't even know who this guy is. And even when it is pointed out, as you did for me, that this guy was interviewed and says himself that he is NOT part of a militia, they just ignore that and keep going with the lie.

I understand your point Jerry, but it is really secondary to the point I am making..
You were asking a question, not making a point. Please don't mistake me for someone who has been following this thread. All I saw was your question. All I did was answer it. There is no "secondary" point because there is no "primary" point. There is only your question, and my answer, within the scope of my awareness on this thread thus far.
 
Same one pic of the same guy from different angles....So you still haven't produced anything other than this one stooge...Probably a lib poser just like you.

You think any of them have pictures of all these many men who were pointing many guns at federal agents? Because all we've seen so far are a couple of pictures of the same man with no federal agent suspended on the other side of the bridge barrier from his gun.
 
What would make you think they don't have jobs?

By the way, Bundy has a job too. He's a cattle rancher. That pays his bills. You must be confusing him with people who take welfare checks & Medicaid from the gubbermint teet.

He's actually more like the tenant who refuses to pay rent, then continues to live in an apartment after the building is condemned.
 
You think any of them have pictures of all these many men who were pointing many guns at federal agents? Because all we've seen so far are a couple of pictures of the same man with no federal agent suspended on the other side of the bridge barrier from his gun.

I don't suppose you understand the purpose of a gun....do you?

It allows one to fire a projectile accurately and at distance...eliminating the need for close quarter combat. Why would someone bring such a weapon to a conflict unless for intimidation or death.

Would you feel safe if being confronted with guns by people vocally opposed to you?
 
He didn't steal anything from me. And since he hasn't been charged with a crime, it looks like the US government doesn't believe he stole from them, either. Let me know when he's been arrested.

More CON no sense... he is in violation of a court order to remove cattle, the Gubmint believes he is stealing. I see the Gubmint as very determined to not have blood shed over this. (unlike the militias who talk of putting women in front as a human shield) I do believe Bundy will be eventually charged with a crime- right now he is throwing his hands in the air claiming the militia, not him, stopped the round-up.

But again the question you refuse to answer is if the thief doesn't steal from you, are you ok with it no matter what...
 
More CON no sense... he is in violation of a court order to remove cattle, the Gubmint believes he is stealing. I see the Gubmint as very determined to not have blood shed over this. (unlike the militias who talk of putting women in front as a human shield) I do believe Bundy will be eventually charged with a crime- right now he is throwing his hands in the air claiming the militia, not him, stopped the round-up.

But again the question you refuse to answer is if the thief doesn't steal from you, are you ok with it no matter what...

So why hasn't he been arrested yet?
 
I don't suppose you understand the purpose of a gun....do you?

It allows one to fire a projectile accurately and at distance...eliminating the need for close quarter combat. Why would someone bring such a weapon to a conflict unless for intimidation or death.

Would you feel safe if being confronted with guns by people vocally opposed to you?

I owe quite a few guns.

Do you have more pictures, including one that shows the federal officer on the other side?
 
Why would someone bring such a weapon to a conflict unless for intimidation or death.
Indeed! What are SWAT teams and the FBI doing at a tax dispute? Is this the Hope and Change thingy?
 
I note the insult, and understand it for what it is. I do not see how believing people should refrain from threatening gun violence on federal officers would be an indicator of a liberal stance. Unless for some odd reason conservatism now entails the acceptance of domestic terrorism.

You're stretching...It is not domestic terrorism, nor was there a threat of gun violence, unless you are talking about the BLM doing the threatening...

If you really think that being labeled as a liberal is an insult, then why are you using the tactics of a liberal in arguing this? See, it is not how you frame it. Threatening gun violence is wrong no matter who's side uses it...People have a right to protect themselves, and that means a constitutionally protected right...You on the other hand see people with guns show up to a scene, and because they have badges, and some alphabet designation then you automatically jump to their defense why? Because it's Obama's BLM? Because they have been land grabbing for a long time under this guise or that....And you defend that?

I am not saying that the militia's are right or wrong, if they broke laws then by all means they get their day in court. Where's our justice? hmmm? Are we to never question the actions of our government? because that has never worked out so well in history.
 
Those are the same 2 pictures of the same man that have been posted repeatedly. He asked you to "Produce another pic of militia pointing a weapon at an agent."

Where's the federal agent on the other side of the barrier?
At and in the white SUVs his rifle is aimed at...
...and you know this...
 
At and in the white SUVs his rifle is aimed at...
...and you know this...

And what are your credentials to make this claim?

I see this as a totally staged event....I don't think he is pointing at anything....
 
So why hasn't he been arrested yet?

Because until the militia blocked the Feds from enforcing a court order it was a civil matter... not every lawbreaker gets arrested. They get a civil judgement against them... now I believe Bundy will be arrested once everyone cools off.

Now quit dodging the question- you claim if someone doesn't steal from you you don't care- so all thieves should go free unless they take directly from you???
 
We must have different history books... I don't recall Rosa threatening violence or being armed. Now because the LAW was as it was she WAS arrested. That arrest was contested in COURT and set in motion the changing of those LAWS.

Democracy rather than mobacracy in action... :peace

She broke the law. Isnt that your beef with these protestors?
 
Back
Top Bottom