• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-White House Official On Benghazi: 'Dude, This Was Like Two Years Ago'

My inability to understand what situation? Benghazi? It's the conservative outrage vehicle of choice at the moment now that Obama care seems to be working. It will change to Susan Rice in a week or so after Republicans realize that their hypocrisy is so blatant on this that even the faithful start to notice. Then this board will fill up with rants about that.

This is what happens when a party can no longer govern.

So don't hold people accountable. Got it. Liberal talking points.
 
In summary: Obama and Progressives are liars, criminals, radicals, extremists, terrorists, tyrannical, arrogant, belligerent, psychopathic, snug, arrogant, narcissistic.

Sounds like you're more Bowerick Wowbagger than John Galt.

I don't believe that - I believe the elitists are without question all of the aforementioned. I believe that the typical US citizen that is a progressive actually believes they're moral and believes they're doing the right thing but their way of showing it is via hate, which is exactly what the elitists want you to do - hate the opposition and keep them in office so they can continue their nefarious plan which is an Orwellian society..

Summing my feelings up in one post would be difficult but to tell you the blunt truth - elitist progressives don't give a **** about the issues you care about - they only care about keeping themselves in office and in their elite status - they only legislate (weather it goes against the Bill of Rights or not) because they want your vote to keep them in office - not because they want to help you. The government doesn't give a **** about you.... It amazes me why progressives actually believe they do.

The only faction that actually does care are the Libertarians and the Tea Party because they're ultimately looking out for your best interests... Yeah they may not be looking out for your free Obamaphone tomorrow, however they're looking out for your livelihood 10-years from now. Sure the Tea Party, Libertarians may be opposed to what you may get tomorrow for free, but at the same time we also understand that nothing is free and your lovely government knows this as well and will be expecting something in return for all this bull**** they're throwing at you...... Now, this government isn't giving you free **** because they like you they're giving you free **** because you're willing to accept it and it suits your needs for right now..... Tomorrow is always going to be a new day and soon enough all that money is going to dry up and once it does you may be the next inline to have your energy, food or perks revoked so the government can reward a smaller base -- and only when that happens will you understand what I'm telling you.

Also, I know in progressiveland everything I just said is "fantasy" or "delusional" which is what the masterminds in the media would like you to believe however there is plenty of historical evidence to confirm what I'm saying when governments take this route against their citizens.

I suppose I would like to end this post with a quote from "Godfellas" which I don't remember verbatim - but I will do my best.

"your enemies don't come at you with contempt or a gun - they come to you with a smile"

That's the progressive way.
 
I do not protect my family by killing Able when Kane is the threat. You never got that. Nor to I lead men to die in the thousands based on lies. You, however, didn't mind at all.

On the other hand, if you show Obama lies lead to deaths, with at least as much evidence as there is against Bush, I'll call him the same. No one who makes excuses for Bush lies really cares about people dying.

No you won't. That's well established.
 
How many requests for help that went unanswered? How many cover ups of what happened?

Well, that would take a whole lot of research to prove that all those other attacks had similar circumstances...But if you wish to take it on then be my guest...;)

But to just throw it out there as insinuation is irrelevant, unless you think that just because we've been attacked before in the past 35 years it makes it ok for the Obama administration to obstruct congressional investigations...

Now Blue, I know you're a smart person, and have agreed with some things you have posted in the past, but to say that bad actions are, or should be excused because someone, anyone else "did it too" is a juvenile, and unacceptable justification for covering up to carry on a campaign without the negative news that this would have brought in truth....You know that....

If that is what you're saying of course.
 
Well, that would take a whole lot of research to prove that all those other attacks had similar circumstances...But if you wish to take it on then be my guest...;)

But to just throw it out there as insinuation is irrelevant, unless you think that just because we've been attacked before in the past 35 years it makes it ok for the Obama administration to obstruct congressional investigations...

Now Blue, I know you're a smart person, and have agreed with some things you have posted in the past, but to say that bad actions are, or should be excused because someone, anyone else "did it too" is a juvenile, and unacceptable justification for covering up to carry on a campaign without the negative news that this would have brought in truth....You know that....

If that is what you're saying of course.

Oh, sorry j-mac. I don't think my comment was perceived correctly. I was agreeing with you and saying that not only did that attack have an ambassador killed; which we haven't seen since the 70's. But prior to this attack the people on the ground were requesting aid. And furthermore, the events were swept under the carpet. That didn't happen in those other events. I was saying those previous attacks were not similar.

It was a fly by night comment. I saw your response and jumped on.
 
Oh, sorry j-mac. I don't think my comment was perceived correctly. I was agreeing with you and saying that not only did that attack have an ambassador killed; which we haven't seen since the 70's. But prior to this attack the people on the ground were requesting aid. And furthermore, the events were swept under the carpet. That didn't happen in those other events. I was saying those previous attacks were not similar.

It was a fly by night comment. I saw your response and jumped on.

I thought that might be the case...Sorry I took it wrong, but the defenders of the liar have been throwing out a similar arguments, or diversions if you will....

It is true that other attacks have happened, but under the circumstance of a presidential campaign in full heat, and the events surrounding said attacks being covered up for the purposes of protecting a campaign narrative I don't think any of the other attacks have had those details...

I am sure you would agree.
 
No you won't. That's well established.
What is well established is that he'll try to drag George W. Bush into virtually every thread no matter the topic. Oh wait, too late. He already delivered. It's literally (apparently) a requirement he imposes upon himself. No matter how obvious and pathetic it is to anyone with an IQ above room temperature. As another poster in this thread would gleefully say, it's retarded.:lamo
 
No you won't. That's well established.

Really, showed me when you've ever shown anything equivalent? As nothing of that nature has happened, aren't you just pretending that you know?
 
Really, showed me when you've ever shown anything equivalent? As nothing of that nature has happened, aren't you just pretending that you know?

Nope. I don't have to prove anything to you...I just let you show your own ignorance.
 
Nope. I don't have to prove anything to you...I just let you show your own ignorance.

Meaning you can't, and you're just blowing smoke to hide that you know I'm right. Got it. :coffeepap
 
Meaning you can't, and you're just blowing smoke to hide that you know I'm right. Got it. :coffeepap

LOL, not at all...I see you are shutting down and resorting to dishonesty.
 
LOL, not at all...I see you are shutting down and resorting to dishonesty.

Do you even know what you write? I can only respond to what you give me. You might want to look up dishonesty.
 
Back
Top Bottom