- Joined
- Mar 14, 2012
- Messages
- 29,135
- Reaction score
- 1,520
- Location
- US, California - federalist
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
They should have tried.
at what cost?
They should have tried.
It is. The military only acts under orders from the executive branch. If there are no orders, the military doesn't act.
The State Department knew within hours on the day of the attack that it was not a protest, but was an attack by Islamist terrorists. It had absolutely nothing to do with a video.
at what cost?
You might be talking of whatever fantasy of the day, I was ridiculing the pointless question of "Where was he when it happened?"
were there any orders to hold that understaffed, non-firebase, at Any cost.
You might be talking of whatever fantasy of the day, I was ridiculing the pointless question of "Where was he when it happened?"
at what cost?
What's truly fascinating about the Rhodes email is who received the copies. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/int...use-advisor-to-spin-blaming-benghazi-on-film/
Why would Mehdi K. Alhassani receive a copy?
Breaking: Benghazi "Smoking Gun" Email Distributed to Muslim Brotherhood Agent |
Progressives have taken the route of: "so what if it was a cover-up."
Progressives are incapable of judging their own "leaders" or questioning their own political philosophy.
Don't be silly.
Why is the question pointless? It's very important to know what the Commander in Chief was doing. Was it to the press secretaries telling the President, The Secretary of State, and the Ambassador to the UN what to say? Is it Ben Rhodes who should be explaining to the American people what happened during a time of crisis?
Quote for Truth.I almost gave this a "like" but, for that, you must change Progressives to either party loyalists or politicians because this behavior is not limited to a single party or political lean.
I almost gave this a "like" but, for that, you must change Progressives to either party loyalists or politicians because this behavior is not limited to a single party or political lean.
Hardly pointless. If you understand that the president gives the military orders to act, and you apparently don't, then it's rather important whether or not he was in a position to know exactly what was going on and thereby in a position to issue an order. The best accounting we have now is that the president told "you guys can handle it", and ducked and ran to where ever. If you know more, a large portion of this country would like to know your inside wisdom. Otherwise, just sit in southern England and wish you had what you once did.
What do you mean at what cost?
Thank You for this fine post.. SPOT ON...
I pray people wake up to the fraud Obama is..this is a powerful part of the mosaic of this horrid cover up
I almost gave this a "like" but, for that, you must change Progressives to either party loyalists or politicians because this behavior is not limited to a single party or political lean.
Yes; you are implying that we should have helped out that understaffed, non firebase, at some cost, potentially; what cost would have been acceptable?
Yes; you are implying that we should have helped out that understaffed, non firebase, at some cost, potentially; what cost would have been acceptable?
If the conspiracy theorists here had any respect for law and order, then Oliver North would still be breaking rocks somewhere secure.
What is too costly for you?
no orders to hold an understaffed, non firebase, at Any cost.