If an armed non-LEO civilian stops me under threat of lethal force, yes, that's exactly how it works.
These 'militia's are not militias no matter what they name themselves, since they don't have proper authority. They're just armed protesters, little better than street gangs.
I retain the right and authority to defend myself from illegitimate armed militia stopping me on the road. That is, in fact, the very reason why I carry in the first place. Road rage, gangs, riots...killing these people is why we have the 2nd Amendment; defending delinquent ranchers is not.I totally agree they aren't legit at all in any sense of the word and should be busted up, but you can't take that authority into your own hands. You would be charged with murder if you knowingly sought out someone with the purpose of engaging them in a lethal exchange, even if you provoke them into attacking first or provoked them into trying to illegally detain you. At best you'd be charged with vigilantism, which is a crime, at at worst you could be charged with first degree murder because here you are conspiring to kill someone
Concerns growing about militia members at Bundy ranch - 8 News NOW
So like I said in other topics about this developing story, its gone beyond the unpaid fees for gazing on Federal land and turned into a question of whether or not we are going to allow an active insurgency to operate within this country.
Also, is it more ironic or sad that these folks who claim to want freedom are acting in exactly the manner of an authoritarian?
Case in point. More ad hominem attacks.
I retain the right and authority to defend myself from illegitimate armed militia stopping me on the road. That is, in fact, the very reason why I carry in the first place. Road rage, gangs, riots...killing these people is why we have the 2nd Amendment; defending delinquent ranchers is not.
This country was created by an armed insurgency.
Which still fails to lend credibility to modern day dopes who fancy themselves to be revolutionaries. Stand on the merits of your position in the here and now.This country was created by an armed insurgency.
You don't have the right to seek out and attempt to create a situation where you are compelled to kill someone to save your own life, thats what you're not understanding.
Don't forget the other minor details like the Continental Congress and state legislators, it was more than just a bunch of guys protesting gazing fees.
Also the fact that Americans engaged in insurgent warfare during our war of independence in no way automatically justifies the use of such tactics by anyone else.
Which still fails to lend credibility to modern day dopes who fancy themselves to be revolutionaries. Stand on the merits of your position in the here and now.
This country was created by an armed insurgency.
And tax (or fee) evasion is not a moral reason to start a war.
Heard of the Boston Tea Party?
Ya, vandalism is wrong.
So, without a bunch of rich (racist) gentleman farmers to lend it some credibility....it's just a bunch of dopes with guns, eh?
You're being deliberately obtuse. I don't believe you can't see or don't understand any difference between the Revolutionary War and the situation around Bundy's ranch.
In other words youre just a troll right now
I cracked up when I read that. And you are right. :lol:Except it'll probably go down in history as Whacko and the Cow Huggers.
:rofl
Your concession by default is accepted.
:lamo
Bet you're a fan of Che Guevara.
You're being deliberately obtuse. I don't believe you can't see or don't understand any difference between the Revolutionary War and the situation around Bundy's ranch.
In other words youre just a troll right now
Bet you're a fan of Che Guevara.
Moderator's Warning: |
Knock it off you two. Stick to the topic, which incidentally is not about each other. |
I don't claim such a right. That's what you're not understanding. I don't do only those things I have a right to do. I can also choose to do things I think I can get away with, or am willing to accept the consequences for, rather I have a right to do it or no.You don't have the right to seek out and attempt to create a situation where you are compelled to kill someone to save your own life, thats what you're not understanding.