• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’[W:254:298:850,989]

Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

His confession is better than a picture.

No, there were hundreds of photographers there. You can't find one who took a picture of these events?

Just one will do.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

One major difference. Martin Luther kings followers chose to march and protest and made the decision themselves. In bundys case there is nothing that indicates that the women and children would volunteer to serve as human shields for his movement.
There's no evidence to show they were forced either.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

No, there were hundreds of photographers there. You can't find one who took a picture of these events?

Just one will do.
I'll stick with the confession.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

:roll: What makes you think he is pointing the gun in the air?

Yeah Calamity, every time I go on I-94 and go past those spaces between those barricades, I get really, really nervous, I think of them as gutless wimps holding rifles in the air, which might be aimed at me or other passing motorists.

Well, you know what they say, don't drink when you drive. And, no drinking before 5. :monkey
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

There's no evidence to show they were forced either.

:roll:

We'd really have to ask the women what they thought of their men's plan to sacrifice women and children. I have to wonder too. How many of those guys are against abortion?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

No, there were hundreds of photographers there. You can't find one who took a picture of these events?

Just one will do.
images (28).jpg
Point a gun of any kind at a law enforcement officer and you will be shot.
The only pictures we have are of this asshole cowering behind cover from afar with his rifle pointed at the federal officers doing their jobs.
Had he been seen doing this by a law enforcement officer instead of a photographer he would now be dead... guaranteed.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

View attachment 67165308
Point a gun of any kind at a law enforcement officer and you will be shot.
The only pictures we have are of this asshole cowering behind cover from afar with his rifle pointed at the federal officers doing their jobs.
Had he been seen doing this by a law enforcement officer instead of a photographer he would now be dead... guaranteed.

I can't see the federal official on the other side of his gun. Where is this person? Let's see him.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

So do law abiding citizens per the 2nd amendment.
Irrelevant.

The tactics were the same. That you're denying facts - priceless.

You and your silly unrelated straw man argument are irrelevant.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

View attachment 67165308
Point a gun of any kind at a law enforcement officer and you will be shot.
The only pictures we have are of this asshole cowering behind cover from afar with his rifle pointed at the federal officers doing their jobs.
Had he been seen doing this by a law enforcement officer instead of a photographer he would now be dead... guaranteed.

You'll find that only stupid people stand out in the open with firearms during a conflict. Funny how our military teach our soldiers to do the same thing, as were the federal officers who are not pictured, yet you make the characterization that this guy is a coward. You're comment is nearly too stupid to even comment on but I made the attempt ...
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

I'll stick with the confession.

So let me get this straight. Not a single one of you can produce a single picture showing a man pointing a gun at law enforcement. Not a single one of you can produce a picture of a man tossing his child in front of an official pointing a gun at him. Not a single picture or video was captured of either one by the hundreds of people there with cameras and videotapes, but you all know it happened.

I'll remind you of this the next time one of you claims people repeat "right wing talking points". That's all you got.

Pictures, or it never happened.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

I can't see the federal official on the other side of his gun. Where is this person? Let's see him.

Who do you think is on the far side of the crowd in this other picture you posted?

The one laying on his stomach on the bridge pointing his gun at the air?

Bundy_Supporters_Guns1.jpg
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

You and your silly unrelated straw man argument are irrelevant.

You created the strawman right here as only you put MLK and weapons together .... remember?

Buck Ewer said:
Completely off topic but MLK did not bring weapons or put out a call to arms when he organized a peaceful march in Birmingham.

Still denying historical fact or did you move on now with your tail between your hypocrite legs? :rofl
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Who do you think is on the far side of the crowd in this other picture you posted?

Show me the picture. For all I know it's a broken down car.

What's over there. Let's see the picture. And let's see how far it is.

What about the guy who tossed his kids in front of the loaded gun. If this was happening, surely someone captured it on film?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

So let me get this straight. Not a single one of you can produce a single picture showing a man pointing a gun at law enforcement. Not a single one of you can produce a picture of a man tossing his child in front of an official pointing a gun at him. Not a single picture or video was captured of either one by the hundreds of people there with cameras and videotapes, but you all know it happened.

I'll remind you of this the next time one of you claims people repeat "right wing talking points". That's all you got.

Pictures, or it never happened.

The picture of the gun pointed at LEO is fait accompli. You however are doing your best to deny its existence. Not that this matters. It only goes to further discredit your spate of silliness.

...like the fact that you refuse to accept that a man confessed to the insurrectionists' strategy of sticking women in the front lines to take on the gun fire like human shields.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Who do you think is on the far side of the crowd in this other picture you posted?

Dirt. Grass. Tumbleweeds. Turtles (allegedly).
 
Last edited:
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Show me the picture. For all I know it's a broken down car.

What's over there. Let's see the picture. And let's see how far it is.

What about the guy who tossed his kids in front of the loaded gun. If this was happening, surely someone captured it on film?

spate of silliness = tiring
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Dirt. Grass. Tumbleweeds. Turtles.

Right. Nothing there but a bridge over troubled lack of water.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

The picture of the gun pointed at LEO is fait accompli. You however are doing your best to deny its existence. Not that this matters. It only goes to further discredit your spate of silliness.

...like the fact that you refuse to accept that a man confessed to the insurrectionists' strategy of sticking women in the front lines to take on the gun fire like human shields.

Wrong. There are no pictures of LEO on the other side of that gun, and you know it.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Right. Nothing there but a bridge over troubled lack of water.

Actually, in that picture he appears to be using the scope to look at the bridge across the way which is other protestors. Probably some hot daughter of a rancher..
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Who do you think is on the far side of the crowd in this other picture you posted?

On this side of that bridge, there's a barricade to keep people on this side of that bridge (Bundy's militia).

In the background, beyond the people lined up at the barricade are the feds (white vehicles)

But you're not going to convince the Bundy supporters that the man on the bridge was aiming his rifle downrange towards the federal officers, your fingers will get tired first.

Bundy_Supporters_Guns1.jpg
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

I can't see the federal official on the other side of his gun. Where is this person? Let's see him.

What the ****ing **** do you think it's pointed at. A goddamn deer?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Actually, in that picture he appears to be using the scope to look at the bridge across the way which is other protestors. Probably some hot daughter of a rancher..

my first thought for sure.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

What the ****ing **** do you think it's pointed at. A goddamn deer?

So you admit you can't see a law enforcement person, you just "think" there is one there.

But you can't produce another angle to verify it, I assume?

For all I know, Sean Connery is standing over there. Or more armed friends of Bundy. Or Bundy himself. Or a damn oil tanker. The fact is, you don't know what's over there either!
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Wrong. There are no pictures of LEO on the other side of that gun, and you know it.
I guess we'll have to wait until the man's trial to see who was right, you or me. I can clearly see LEO on the far side of that crowd.
 
Back
Top Bottom