Snopes didn't provide if it was part of the ENN plan prior to June 2013 when ENN dropped interest. So it's accurate to say it may have been, unless you have evidence it was not. Well.... do you?
You will be hard pressed to find ANYWHERE that I have defended Bundy or said they shouldnt act. All I have said is that they should act responsibly. Instead...they allowed a scofflaw cattle rancher to bend them over the corral. Pathetic.Any proof the 'government' wants THAT land for solar power, or just more CON crap to deflect from a long time thief, who as ignored the courts BTW, FINALLY, not suddenly getting the LAW enforced on his arrogant butt.
"Troops" have been on the border for decades, this admin has been rounding up MORE illegals than the BushII one. You are just slinging crap to avoid the facts about Bundy and his long time law breaking. He wasn't ignored, the court system took time to try and give the putz time to back down and remove his cattle. :doh
I doubt you have rounded up a single cow in your lifetime much less hundreds at a time... it takes a small 'army' on thousands of acres. Bundy and a few rather rabid self proclaimed militia types have ranted online about this and it would be disgraceful to send civilian wranglers into a hot mess without LE to safeguard them.
The government banned grazing in 1993, has been to court over it and the final straw was Bundy ignoring a court order to REMOVE his cattle.
I agree the BLM should have continued the round-up, Bundy is pushing for a violent confrontation. But I can imagine the CON bloggers firing up- but not flocking to the fire fight- calling any confrontation another 'Waco' :roll:
I can't find where an 'administration official' said anything about filling coffins.... where is that???
Nawww, if a bunch of city takers squatted in a National park, detroying the flora, crapping everywhere, and defied court orders to vacate are you saying you'd tell us you're ok with that..... time for you to be honest....
Look how cute and angry you are.Keep the CON alive!!!! It MAY have been.... ahhh the loving embrace of 'may have been'!!!!
Just to be honest, since it was back in 1993 that grazing was prohibited on that land- it should have sat idle for over a decade- shouldn't it be put to some sort of use that GAINS the TAXPAYER something???? I mean as it was one man was ILLEGALLY profiting from that land that belong to all of us. Why is this such a difficult concept for the CON mind to wrap around????
I see this the same way old abandoned building have squatters illegally camping in them, tearing them up, paying no rent or taxes. IF a company or business sees potential in these old buildings and wants to do something with them... do the ILLEGAL Squatters get to threaten armed violence??? Would the CON 'patriots' flock to the inner city ready to defend the squatters???
Be honest....
Are they?
I AGREE...he SHOULD pay up. Its rather telling that the BEST the fed could come up with was without any type of thought or reason send in what amounted to an assault team to handle a ****ing DEBT COLLECTION. And they couldnt even do THAT right.
And then drove away like a bunch of little bitches. So...they came up with a stupid game plan and then got drove.
Circular reasoning when it agrees with your predisposition, eh buddy?
Theres no doubt what Putin would have done...he would have eliminated the rancher. WHat he WOULDNT have done is send in a small army of armed government officials only to have them get bitch slapped and sent running.
The administration just spent well over a million dollars in a show of big tough badass force only to get punked by the guy. THATS why people see him as a hero (which he is not).
No...we generally see things pretty much clearly, not the way YOU like to see them for us. But speaking of uncomfortable...how about the liberals that were all up in arms about Bush's actions and are now active defenders of the core and cause?
