• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 358 ]

Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

there is no scandal
nothing was found to be scandalous

not even a smidgen of corruption has been identified
which reality must dismay the reich wing

By Lois Lerners own admission, back in 2012 there existed a "smidgen of corruption ".

She just lied and blamed it on " rogue agents " in Cinci.

Her extending her right to not INCRIMINATE herself contradicts your assertion of there not being a "smidgen of corruption ".

Oh but thats right. You guys see no problem with the strategy of stonewalling as a way to adress a "witch hunt ".

For the first time in Human history that excuse is supposed to make sense and count as a credible response to the charge of unprecedented Government abuse and corruption.

We're not supposed to read into her 24 Consecutive Fifth amendment pleas.

Lol...sorry, you people need to remember that not everyone is as gullible and so easily manipulated as the Common Obama supporter is.

The rest of us a free to use our brains.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

pleading the fifth is asserting her Constitutional right
but you are welcome to show us anything else which it proves
i'll wait for your 'proof'

It proves she committed a crime. The 5th Amendment says nothing about continuing investigations, only that a person can't be forced to inctiminate himself.

It's one of two thing, or both: perjury and/or obstruction of justice.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

there is no scandal
nothing was found to be scandalous
not even a smidgen of corruption has been identified
which reality must dismay the reich wing

If theres no scandal, Lerner has no reason to plead the 5th.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

If theres no scandal, Lerner has no reason to plead the 5th.

that is for her to decide

now, go off and find us proof of this non-existent 'scandal'
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

By Lois Lerners own admission, back in 2012 there existed a "smidgen of corruption ".

She just lied and blamed it on " rogue agents " in Cinci.

Her extending her right to not INCRIMINATE herself contradicts your assertion of there not being a "smidgen of corruption ".

Oh but thats right. You guys see no problem with the strategy of stonewalling as a way to adress a "witch hunt ".

For the first time in Human history that excuse is supposed to make sense and count as a credible response to the charge of unprecedented Government abuse and corruption.

We're not supposed to read into her 24 Consecutive Fifth amendment pleas.

Lol...sorry, you people need to remember that not everyone is as gullible and so easily manipulated as the Common Obama supporter is.

The rest of us a free to use our brains.

while abandoning the Constitution
which is what makes your side so scary to so many Americans
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

By Lois Lerners own admission, back in 2012 there existed a "smidgen of corruption ".

She just lied and blamed it on " rogue agents " in Cinci.

Her extending her right to not INCRIMINATE herself contradicts your assertion of there not being a "smidgen of corruption ".

Oh but thats right. You guys see no problem with the strategy of stonewalling as a way to adress a "witch hunt ".

For the first time in Human history that excuse is supposed to make sense and count as a credible response to the charge of unprecedented Government abuse and corruption.

We're not supposed to read into her 24 Consecutive Fifth amendment pleas.

Lol...sorry, you people need to remember that not everyone is as gullible and so easily manipulated as the Common Obama supporter is.

The rest of us a free to use our brains.
The people who think there is a scandal are wrong.

Have Some Sympathy For IRS Cincinnati Gang That Couldn't Sort Straight - Forbes
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

pleading the fifth is asserting her Constitutional right
but you are welcome to show us anything else which it proves
i'll wait for your 'proof'

Her constitutional right to what?

Answer: It's her constitutional right not to be compelled to give testimony that would incriminate her. aka, if a persons tesitmony would implicate them in criminal activity, they have the right to plead the 5th and refuse to answer questions.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

that is for her to decide

now, go off and find us proof of this non-existent 'scandal'

No, its not for her to decide...lol!
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

there is no scandal
nothing was found to be scandalous
not even a smidgen of corruption has been identified
which reality must dismay the reich wing

Why do you say that when you know it's not true? I can understand the President lying because of his political situation but you, as a free man, should be able to speak and think as a free man. If you do that then the evidence is inescapable.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Her constitutional right to what?

Answer: It's her constitutional right not to be compelled to give testimony that would incriminate her. aka, if a persons tesitmony would implicate them in criminal activity, they have the right to plead the 5th and refuse to answer questions.

In fact it has been argued that because she made a statement outlining her position prior to taking the fifth she could therefore not take the fifth. She would have to take the fifth immediately.

Of course we can pretend that taking the fifth means nothing but we also know that's codswallop.
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3


Hey Pete, you need to update your reading list, because that 10 month old article just doesn't cut it.... I realize that you only want reading material that conforms with your political beliefs, but if you're interested in the real truth, rather than the politically convenient truth, find something written within the last month or 2.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Why do you say that when you know it's not true? I can understand the President lying because of his political situation but you, as a free man, should be able to speak and think as a free man. If you do that then the evidence is inescapable.

The evidence is of a low level employee not doing his job correctly when dealing with an poorly written and ambiguous law. The crime is that political organizations received tax exempt status like a non-profit not that they didn't get approved fast enough.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

The evidence is of a low level employee not doing his job correctly when dealing with an poorly written and ambiguous law. The crime is that political organizations received tax exempt status like a non-profit not that they didn't get approved fast enough.

What evidence are you referring to?
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

Hey Pete, you need to update your reading list, because that 10 month old article just doesn't cut it.... I realize that you only want reading material that conforms with your political beliefs, but if you're interested in the real truth, rather than the politically convenient truth, find something written within the last month or 2.
The truth is that there is nothing scandalous here, it's a story of the Cincinatti office being overwelmed. The is nothing that implicates Obama.

L
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

The truth is that there is nothing scandalous here, it's a story of the Cincinatti office being overwelmed. The is nothing that implicates Obama.
How certain are you of that? Where did you get this "Truth"?
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

The truth is that there is nothing scandalous here, it's a story of the Cincinatti office being overwelmed. The is nothing that implicates Obama.

L

Whether Obama was in on it or not, it certainly ins't a case of some IRS office being overwhelmed... Your living in a fantasy world if you actually believe that.
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

How certain are you of that? Where did you get this "Truth"?

From a 10 month old op-ed... Once he read that, it became etched in stone for him,
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

this part; the fifth amendment, which you would violate for finding her in contempt for refusing to testify against herself:
[emphasis added by bubba for the reading impaired]

So you're stating that a contempt charge is unconstitutional...
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Anyone thinks that delaying the application of 20 or so TeaParty groups for a status they didn't have to apply for is an idiot, and doesn't have the political sense to get elected to dogcatcher. (in anywhere except New Jersey where they seem to like that sort of thing)

I've read through this sentence ten times and it still doesn't make sense.
 
Re: Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 3

Whether Obama was in on it or not, it certainly ins't a case of some IRS office being overwhelmed... Your living in a fantasy world if you actually believe that.

Nope, I am not, this not the first time I've presented this concept to you.


Bye, bye Grim. Do me a favor, if you're going to call the Obama corrupt on the issue of IRS targeting Of conservative organizations please come with some facts not your opinion. Its been 8 months since this started and no one has been able to link any of it to obama including Darrell issa's house committee. In that regard, the co-chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee , Elijah Cummings, was on Candy Crowley's CNN show State of the Union on June 9, 2013. Here is the transcript:

CROWLEY: Was the IRS' target of conservative -- targeting of conservative groups orchestrated by Washington? The chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Darrell Issa, thinks so. His ranking member, Elijah Cummings, has a different opinion, and he is next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. DARRELL ISSA, (R) CHMN., OVERSIGHT AND GOVT. REFORM COMMITTEE: This is a problem that was coordinated in all likelihood right out of Washington headquarters. And, we're getting to proving it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CROWLEY: That, of course, is the Republican chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee sharing his thoughts last week about the IRS scandal. I am joined now by the committee's top Democrat. He is Congressman Elijah Cummings of Maryland.

Congressman, I find myself in the same situation I was in last week with Congressman Issa and that is that you have provided me with excerpts from interviews that the committee has done and nobody will give me the whole transcript. What is the problem here with you giving me the whole transcript or Congressman Issa, because it does -- in the end it kind of becomes everybody's version of the truth.

CUMMINGS: Candy, I have asked Chairman Issa to release those transcripts to the public. I want every syllable of those transcripts to be released. He's the chairman. Now, I can tell you, I understand that he agreed to release them a week ago. And, I guess you still haven't gotten them based upon what you just said.

CROWLEY: I haven't, but don't you have them, too?

CUMMINGS: We have them, but again, let me be clear. I wrote Chairman Issa on Thursday and I wrote to him this morning, I want those transcripts to be released. But he's the chairman of the committee. We're not in power. Now, if he does not release them, I will. Period.

CROWLEY: OK.

CUMMINGS: But again, I have to --

CROWLEY: Can we have a deadline?

CUMMINGS: I'm sorry.

CROWLEY: Can we have some date by which we could get them do you think?

CUMMINGS: Well, I will talk to the chairman again. I've written him and begged him to release the transcripts. I want them released. The only thing I would say is I do want redactions of names of some people who are employees (ph), but other than that, I think every syllable should be released. And, I can tell you, I'm willing to come on your show next week with the chairman with the transcripts if he agrees to do that. But if he doesn't, I'll release them by the end of the week.

CROWLEY: All right. We will check-in with both of you then. Let me now put up for our audience with the caveat that these are parts of an interview that you all had released to us. And this is a Cincinnati IRS manager of the screening group. So, in other words, the folks that were picking out Tea Party applications for tax exempt status. This is their boss in Cincinnati and some of the Q&A with Congressional investigators.

Question, "in your opinion, was it decision to screen and centralized the review of Tea Party cases the targeting of the president's political enemies?" Answer, "I do not believe that the screening of these cases had anything to do other than consistency and identifying issues that needed to have further development."

Question, "Do you have any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to screen Tea Party cases?" Answer, "I have no reason to believe that." In some ways, this is reminiscent to me of some of the things that Chairman Issa gave me, which is there's really not a way that this manager could know whether there was White House involvement. So, this is their opinion.

But we still haven't kind of gotten to the -- the crux of the problem here, which is who wrote the BOLO, be on the look out for, that said look for Tea -- you know, names of Tea Party or Patriot? Who wrote that?

CUMMINGS: OK. Let's back up first, Candy. One of the things you did not say just now is that this man was the manager of the Cincinnati group that reviewed the exemption process.

CROWLEY: Right.

CUMMINGS: Listen up now. He was a 21-year veteran of the IRS. And he was -- he described himself in the interviews in response to a Republican attorney's question as a conservative Republican. Very significant. He is a conservative Republican working for the IRS. I think this interview and these statements go a long way to what's showing that the White House was not involved in this. We knew that -- and this is the guy by the way, this conservative 21-year veteran of IRS is the same one who sent the initial case, the Tea Party case, up to the Washington technical office.

CROWLEY: Right.

CUMMINGS: To have it reviewed. It had not been requested by the Washington technical office of IRS.

CROWLEY: Right.

CUMMINGS: Very significant.

CROWLEY: Well, but even a conservative Republican in Cincinnati wouldn't actually know what the White House had on its brain or what - or even probably what the IRS and Washington had. That's my only point. But there's not a definitiveness to this in the sense that I'm trying to figure out if anybody in the interview so far has said I wrote the BOLO. That said pull out Tea Party applications? Who is that person?

CUMMINGS: Nobody. Again, it started -- this thing started with this guy -- it was started with a screener in his unit. The screener has -- it started with a Tea Party case, one Tea Party case in 2010 --

CROWLEY: Do you know what case that was by the way? It was just described as high profile. What does that mean?

CUMMINGS: High profile. That means it's a case that is unique. They believe that it would set precedent -- whatever decision they made would set precedent. And they wanted to make sure that it was handled in a way whereby whenever cases came behind it that were similar that they would be treated in a consistent way. This is very significant. And so the screener - a screener looked at this first case and then he takes it to his boss, the Republican conservative.

CROWLEY: Right. CUMMINGS: And he says, boss, you know, this looks like a high profile case. Here's an organization that wants tax exempt status, but they want to be involved in political activity.

CROWLEY: Right.

 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

So you're stating that a contempt charge is unconstitutional...

a contempt charge because the woman refuses to testify against herself, while asserting her fifth amendment right
yep. unConstitutional
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

There is a claim he didn't pay some taxes in I think France. No big deal.

if that was Romney youd want him deported... i laugh... nothing is a big deal it help liberal destruction of the USA
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

a contempt charge because the woman refuses to testify against herself, while asserting her fifth amendment right
yep. unConstitutional

That's the rub, she testified then claimed the fifth. Not the same thing.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

a contempt charge because the woman refuses to testify against herself, while asserting her fifth amendment right
yep. unConstitutional

do you get your news from an etch-a-sketch?.. Its like your not even involved in the story, but are sure the Libs are innocent..
 
Back
Top Bottom